How flexible is constituent order in the midfield of German subordinate clauses?: A corpus study revealing unexpected rigidity

It is almost a commonplace that word order in the midfield of German clauses is flexible. Although statements to this effect do not claim that “anything goes”, they suggest that word order variability in German clauses is considerably greater than, for example, in Dutch and English clauses. Few systematic empirical studies of the actual amount of variation that go beyond the intuition of the individual linguist have been published as yet. In the present paper, we adduce empirical data drawn from a corpus study on the linear order of Subject (SB), Indirect Object (IO) and Direct Object (DO) in German subordinate clauses.

[1]  G. Kempen,et al.  A corpus study into word order variation in German subordinate clauses: Animacy affects linearization independently of grammatical function assignment , 2003 .

[2]  Thomas Wasov,et al.  Postverbal behavior , 2002, CSLI lecture notes series.

[3]  Karin Harbusch,et al.  A Quantitative Model of Word Order and Movement in English, Dutch and German Complement Constructions , 2002, COLING.

[4]  Karin Harbusch,et al.  Performance Grammar: a Declarative Definition , 2001, CLIN.

[5]  Frank Keller,et al.  Gradience in Grammar: Experimental and Computational Aspects of Degrees of Grammaticality , 2001 .

[6]  G. Müller Optimality, markedness, and word order in German , 1999 .

[7]  Karin Harbusch,et al.  A corpus study into word order variation in German subordinate clauses: Animacy affects linearization independently of function assignment , 2003 .

[8]  Johannes Engelkamp,et al.  Wortstellung im deutschen Mittelfeld , 1996 .

[9]  A. Sorace,et al.  MAGNITUDE ESTIMATION OF LINGUISTIC ACCEPTABILITY , 1996 .

[10]  Hans Uszkoreit,et al.  Word Order and Constituent Structure in German , 1987, CSLI Lecture Notes.

[11]  Saarland UniversityPostfa A Statistical Account on Word Order Variation in German , 2000 .

[12]  Wojciech Skut,et al.  An Annotation Scheme for Free Word Order Languages , 1997, ANLP.

[13]  Wolfgang Lezius,et al.  A Description Language for Syntactically Annotated Corpora , 2000, COLING.

[14]  John A. Hawkins,et al.  A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency , 1995 .