Combination of traffic-responsive and gating control in urban networks: Effective interactions

Recent findings regarding macroscopic relationships of urban traffic measures such as the Macroscopic or Network Fundamental Diagram (MFD or NFD) have led to the development of novel traffic control strategies that can be applied at a network-wide level. One pertinent example is perimeter flow control (also known as gating or metering), which limits the rate at which vehicles are allowed to enter an urban region. In general, these gating strategies seek to prevent a network from becoming congested and maximize network efficiency/productivity by maintaining an optimal accumulation of vehicles within the network. Several studies have found that NFDs are more well-defined (i.e., have less scatter and show better overall network performance) when adaptive traffic signals are installed that dynamically respond to local traffic conditions. A combined gating and adaptive traffic control scheme can leverage the more reproducible macroscopic traffic patterns achieved with adaptive signals to provide more robust and efficient gating control. The purpose of this paper is to explore the benefits of combining perimeter gating with locally adaptive traffic signals through micro-simulation of the Chania, Greece traffic network. Two adaptive traffic signal strategies are considered with the feedback-based gating strategy: (1) a simple volume-based strategy and (2) a modified version of the SCATS algorithm. The results of the combined gating/adaptive signal control scheme are compared to gating under fixed traffic signals and the implementation of adaptive signals only. Overall, the study finds that travel delays and congestion can be considerably reduced with the combined strategy. This is because the adaptive traffic signals allow the network to achieve higher network productivity while the gating control allows the network to maintain this higher efficiency for a longer period of time than if left uncontrolled. The results are promising for the implementation of perimeter gating strategies in practice

[1]  Nikolaos Geroliminis,et al.  Perimeter and boundary flow control in multi-reservoir heterogeneous networks , 2013 .

[2]  Christine Buisson,et al.  Exploring the Impact of Homogeneity of Traffic Measurements on the Existence of Macroscopic Fundamental Diagrams , 2009 .

[3]  Peter Koonce,et al.  Statistical Study of the Impact of Adaptive Traffic Signal Control on Traffic and Transit Performance , 2013 .

[4]  Nathan H. Gartner,et al.  OPAC: A DEMAND-RESPONSIVE STRATEGY FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROL , 1983 .

[5]  Vikash V. Gayah,et al.  On the impacts of locally adaptive signal control on urban network stability and the Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram , 2014 .

[6]  Markos Papageorgiou,et al.  Exploiting the fundamental diagram of urban networks for feedback-based gating , 2012 .

[7]  S. P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Routing Strategies Based on Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram , 2012 .

[8]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  Urban Gridlock: Macroscopic Modeling and Mitigation Approaches , 2007 .

[9]  Nikolaos Geroliminis,et al.  Properties of a well-defined Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram for urban traffic , 2011 .

[10]  Nikolas Geroliminis,et al.  Multiple Concentric Gating Traffic Control in Large-Scale Urban Networks , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[11]  Nikolas Geroliminis,et al.  Corrigendum to “Estimating MFDs in Simple Networks with Route Choice”☆ , 2013 .

[12]  Jean-Loup Farges,et al.  THE PRODYN REAL TIME TRAFFIC ALGORITHM , 1983 .

[13]  C. Daganzo,et al.  Macroscopic relations of urban traffic variables: Bifurcations, multivaluedness and instability , 2011 .

[14]  Markos Papageorgiou,et al.  Controller Design for Gating Traffic Control in Presence of Time-delay in Urban Road Networks , 2015 .

[15]  Nikolas Geroliminis,et al.  Dynamics of heterogeneity in urban networks: aggregated traffic modeling and hierarchical control , 2015 .

[16]  Vikash V. Gayah,et al.  Clockwise Hysteresis Loops in the Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram , 2010 .

[17]  Lele Zhang,et al.  A comparative study of Macroscopic Fundamental Diagrams of arterial road networks governed by adaptive traffic signal systems , 2011, 1112.3761.

[18]  P R Lowrie,et al.  The Sydney coordinated adaptive traffic system - principles, methodology, algorithms , 1982 .

[19]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Traffic dynamics: Its impact on the Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram , 2015 .

[20]  Nikolas Geroliminis,et al.  Optimal Perimeter Control for Two Urban Regions With Macroscopic Fundamental Diagrams: A Model Predictive Approach , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[21]  Ludovic Leclercq,et al.  Macroscopic Traffic Dynamics with Heterogeneous Route Patterns , 2015 .

[22]  Jack Haddad,et al.  Robust perimeter control design for an urban region , 2014 .

[23]  Nikolas Geroliminis,et al.  Optimal Hybrid Perimeter and Switching Plans Control for Urban Traffic Networks , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[24]  Markos Papageorgiou,et al.  A Multivariable Regulator Approach to Traffic-Responsive Network-Wide Signal Control , 2000 .

[25]  Meead Saberi,et al.  Urban Network Gridlock: Theory, Characteristics, and Dynamics , 2013 .

[26]  R D Bretherton,et al.  THE SCOOT ON-LINE TRAFFIC SIGNAL OPTIMISATION TECHNIQUE , 1982 .

[27]  Wuping Xin,et al.  New Signal Control Optimization Policy for Oversaturated Arterial Systems , 2010 .

[28]  Markos Papageorgiou,et al.  A Simplified Estimation Scheme for the Number of Vehicles in Signalized Links , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[29]  N. Geroliminis,et al.  Existence of urban-scale macroscopic fundamental diagrams: Some experimental findings - eScholarship , 2007 .

[30]  Nikolas Geroliminis,et al.  Equilibrium analysis and route guidance in large-scale networks with MFD dynamics , 2015 .