A novel framework for optimizing motor (Re)-learning with a robotic exoskeleton

A critical question to be answered to improve robotic rehabilitation is what is the optimal rehabilitation environment for a subject that will facilitate maximum recovery during therapy? Studies suggest that task variability, nature and degree of assistance or error-augmentation and type of feedback play a critical role in motor (re)-learning. In this work, we present a framework for robot-assisted motor (re)-learning that provides subject-specific training by allowing for simultaneous adaptation of task, assistance and feedback based on the performance of the subject on the task. We model a continuous and coordinated multi-joint task using a learning-from-demonstration approach, which allows the task to be modeled in a generative manner such that the challenge-level of the task could be modulated in an online manner. To train the subjects for dexterous manipulation, we present a torque-based task that requires the subject to dynamically regulate their joint torques. Finally, we carry out a pilot study with healthy human subjects using our previously developed hand exoskeleton to test a hypothesis and the results suggest that training under simultaneous adaptation of task, assistance and feedback positively affects motor learning.

[1]  C. A. Dairaghi,et al.  Concurrent neuromechanical and functional gains following upper-extremity power training post-stroke , 2013, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[2]  David J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Comparison of error-amplification and haptic-guidance training techniques for learning of a timing-based motor task by healthy individuals , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  Hao Yu,et al.  An Incremental Design of Radial Basis Function Networks , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems.

[4]  Masaya Hirashima,et al.  Intermittent Visual Feedback Can Boost Motor Learning of Rhythmic Movements: Evidence for Error Feedback Beyond Cycles , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Konrad P. Körding,et al.  Uncertainty of Feedback and State Estimation Determines the Speed of Motor Adaptation , 2009, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[6]  Tadej Bajd,et al.  Multi-Fingered Grasping and Manipulation in Virtual Environments Using an Isometric Finger Device , 2007, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[7]  S. Micera,et al.  Robotic techniques for upper limb evaluation and rehabilitation of stroke patients , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[8]  F. Valero-Cuevas Predictive modulation of muscle coordination pattern magnitude scales fingertip force magnitude over the voluntary range. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  José Angelo Barela,et al.  Grip and load force coordination in cyclical isometric manipulation task is not affected by the feedback type , 2013, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[10]  Timothy D. Lee,et al.  Schema Theory: Critical Review and Implications for the Role of Cognition in a New Theory of Motor Learning , 2003, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[11]  Robert C. Wagenaar,et al.  Therapy Impact on Functional Recovery in Stroke Rehabilitation , 1999 .

[12]  Tariq Rahman,et al.  A review of design issues in rehabilitation robotics with reference to North American research , 1995 .

[13]  R. Schmidt A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. , 1975 .

[14]  C. Winstein,et al.  Effects of physical guidance and knowledge of results on motor learning: support for the guidance hypothesis. , 1994, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[15]  Won Hyuk Chang,et al.  Robot-assisted Therapy in Stroke Rehabilitation , 2013, Journal of stroke.

[16]  Ali Utku Pehlivan,et al.  A Subject-Adaptive Controller for Wrist Robotic Rehabilitation , 2015, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[17]  C H Shea,et al.  Composition of practice: influence on the retention of motor skills. , 1991, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[18]  D. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[19]  J. Patton,et al.  Evaluation of robotic training forces that either enhance or reduce error in chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  M. Mon-Williams,et al.  Motor Control and Learning , 2006 .

[21]  Andrea N. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Retraining and assessing hand movement after stroke using the MusicGlove: comparison with conventional hand therapy and isometric grip training , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[22]  R. Teasell,et al.  The Role of Task-Specific Training in Rehabilitation Therapies , 2005, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[23]  Marcia Kilchenman O'Malley,et al.  An index finger exoskeleton with series elastic actuation for rehabilitation: Design, control and performance characterization , 2015, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[24]  M. Quiñones,et al.  Practice variability and transfer of training: the role of self-efficacy generality. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[25]  D.J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Optimizing Compliant, Model-Based Robotic Assistance to Promote Neurorehabilitation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[26]  L. Carey,et al.  Task-specific training: evidence for and translation to clinical practice. , 2009, Occupational therapy international.

[27]  F. Zajac,et al.  Large index-fingertip forces are produced by subject-independent patterns of muscle excitation. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  Robert E. Stadulis,et al.  Effects of Variability of Practice on the Transfer and Performance of Open and Closed Motor Skills , 1991 .

[29]  Masaya Hirashima,et al.  Prospective errors determine motor learning , 2015, Nature Communications.

[30]  A. Mirelman,et al.  Effects of Training With a Robot-Virtual Reality System Compared With a Robot Alone on the Gait of Individuals After Stroke , 2009, Stroke.

[31]  Joanna J McAdam,et al.  Does repetitive task training improve functional activity after stroke? A Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2010, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[32]  R. Johansson,et al.  Control of grasp stability in humans under different frictional conditions during multidigit manipulation. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  J. V. Rossum SCHMIDT'S SCHEMA THEORY: THE EMPIRICAL BASE OF THE VARIABILITY OF PRACTICE HYPOTHESIS , 1990 .

[34]  M. Guadagnoli,et al.  Challenge Point: A Framework for Conceptualizing the Effects of Various Practice Conditions in Motor Learning , 2004, Journal of motor behavior.

[35]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Error correction, sensory prediction, and adaptation in motor control. , 2010, Annual review of neuroscience.

[36]  A. U. Pehlivan,et al.  Current Trends in Robot-Assisted Upper-Limb Stroke Rehabilitation: Promoting Patient Engagement in Therapy , 2014, Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports.

[37]  Sunil K Agrawal,et al.  Effect of robotic performance-based error-augmentation versus error-reduction training on the gait of healthy individuals. , 2013, Gait & posture.

[38]  Konrad P. Körding,et al.  Bayesian Integration and Non-Linear Feedback Control in a Full-Body Motor Task , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[39]  Ashish D. Deshpande,et al.  Assist-as-Needed Controllers for Index Finger Module of a Hand Exoskeleton for Rehabilitation , 2015 .

[40]  R. Riener,et al.  Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review , 2012, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[41]  H. Hermens,et al.  Nature, timing, frequency and type of augmented feedback; does it influence motor relearning of the hemiparetic arm after stroke? A systematic review , 2010, Disability and rehabilitation.

[42]  J. Burdick,et al.  Implications of Assist-As-Needed Robotic Step Training after a Complete Spinal Cord Injury on Intrinsic Strategies of Motor Learning , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[43]  Vassiliki Derri,et al.  The effect of variable and stable practice on performance and learning the header skill of young athletes in soccer , 2014 .

[44]  Mark D. Huffman,et al.  AHA Statistical Update Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics — 2012 Update A Report From the American Heart Association WRITING GROUP MEMBERS , 2010 .

[45]  Jun Nakanishi,et al.  Dynamical Movement Primitives: Learning Attractor Models for Motor Behaviors , 2013, Neural Computation.

[46]  J. Krakauer Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. , 2006, Current opinion in neurology.