Comparison of light- and SST-based geolocation with satellite telemetry in free-ranging albatrosses

Light-based archival tags are increasingly being used on free-ranging marine vertebrates to study their movements using geolocation estimates. These methods use algorithms that incorporate threshold light techniques to determine longitude and latitude. More recently, researchers have begun using sea surface temperature (SST) to determine latitude in temperate regions. The accuracy and application of these algorithms have not been validated on free-ranging birds. Errors in both geolocation methods were quantified by double-tagging Laysan (Phoebastria immutabilis Rothschild) and black-footed (P. nigripes Audubon) albatrosses with both leg-mounted archival tags that measured SST and ambient light, and satellite transmitters. Laysan albatrosses were captured and released from breeding colonies on Tern Island, northwestern Hawaiian Islands (23°52′N, 166°17′W) and Guadalupe Island, Mexico (28°31′N, 118°10′W) and black-footed albatrosses from Tern Island. Studies were carried out between December 2002 and March 2003. For all birds combined, the mean ± SD great circle (GC) distance between light-based locations and satellite-derived locations was 400±298 km (n=131). Errors in geolocation positions were reduced to 202±171 km (n=154) when light-based longitude and SST-based latitude (i.e. SST/light) were used to establish locations. The SST/light method produced comparable results for two Laysan albatross populations that traveled within distinctly different oceanic regions (open ocean vs more coastal) whereas light-based methods produced greater errors in the coastal population. Archival tags deployed on black-footed albatrosses returned a significantly higher proportion of lower-quality locations, which was attributed to interference of the light sensor on the tag. Overall, the results demonstrate that combining measures of light-based longitude and SST-based latitude significantly reduces the error in location estimates for albatrosses and can provide valid latitude estimates during the equinoxes, when light-based latitude measurements are indeterminate.

[1]  David W. Welch,et al.  Ability of Archival Tags to Provide Estimates of Geographical Position Based on Light Intensity , 2001 .

[2]  C. Patrick Doncaster,et al.  Pelagic seabirds and the marine environment: foraging patterns of wandering albatrosses in relation to prey availability and distribution , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  Scarla J. Weeks,et al.  Offshore diplomacy, or how seabirds mitigate intra-specific competition: a case study based on GPS tracking of Cape gannets from neighbouring colonies , 2004 .

[4]  C. Hull.  The foraging zones of breeding royal (Eudyptes schlegeli) and rockhopper (E. chrysocome) penguins: an assessment of techniques and species comparison , 1999 .

[5]  W. D. Bowen,et al.  An algorithm to improve geolocation positions using sea surface temperature and diving depth , 2002 .

[6]  Stephanie Wray,et al.  Wildlife telemetry - remote monitoring and tracking of animals , 1992 .

[7]  Henri Weimerskirch,et al.  Use of seabirds to monitor sea-surface temperatures and to validate satellite remote-sensing measurements in the Southern Ocean , 1995 .

[8]  Henri Weimerskirch,et al.  Activity pattern of foraging in the wandering albatross: a marine predator with two modes of prey searching , 1997 .

[9]  Rory P. Wilson,et al.  A device for measuring seabird activity at sea , 1995 .

[10]  H. Weimerskirch,et al.  Oceanic respite for wandering albatrosses , 2000, Nature.

[11]  H. Fritz,et al.  Scale–dependent hierarchical adjustments of movement patterns in a long–range foraging seabird , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  John P. Croxall,et al.  Satellite tracking of wandering albatrosses (Diomedea exulans) in the South Atlantic , 1992, Antarctic Science.

[13]  George L. Pickard,et al.  Descriptive Physical Oceanography: An Introduction , 1963 .

[14]  Scot D. Anderson,et al.  Expanded niche for white sharks , 2002 .

[15]  C. Pennycuick.  The Flight of Petrels and Albatrosses (Procellariiformes), Observed in South Georgia and its Vicinity , 1982 .

[16]  S. B. Blackwell,et al.  Migratory Movements, Depth Preferences, and Thermal Biology of Atlantic Bluefin Tuna , 2001, Science.

[17]  David W. Welch,et al.  An assessment of light-based geoposition estimates from archival tags , 1999 .

[18]  David C. Schneider,et al.  Quantitative Ecology: Spatial and Temporal Scaling , 1994 .

[19]  M. P. M. Reddy,et al.  Descriptive Physical Oceanography , 1990 .

[20]  Thomas Alerstam,et al.  Flight Tracks and Speeds of Antarctic and Atlantic Seabirds: Radar and Optical Measurements , 1993 .

[21]  Rory P. Wilson,et al.  Remote-sensing systems and seabirds: their use, abuse and potential for measuring marine environmental variables , 2002 .

[22]  Kevin C. Weng,et al.  Validation of geolocation estimates based on light level and sea surface temperature from electronic tags , 2004 .

[23]  D. Costa,et al.  Behavioural factors affecting foraging effort of breeding wandering albatrosses , 2001 .

[24]  Brent S. Stewart,et al.  DOCUMENTING MIGRATIONS OF NORTHERN ELEPHANT SEALS USING DAY LENGTH , 1992 .

[25]  Philip A. Ekstrom,et al.  An advance in geolocation by light , 2004 .

[26]  Dnn,et al.  The Behaviour, Population Biology and Physiology of the Petrels , 1996 .

[27]  Daniel P. Costa,et al.  THE SECRET LIFE OF MARINE MAMMALS NOVEL TOOLS FOR STUDYING THEIR BEHAVIOR AND BIOLOGY AT SEA , 1993 .

[28]  Rory P. Wilson,et al.  Black-browed albatrosses, international fisheries and the Patagonian Shelf , 2000 .

[29]  Vsevolod Afanasyev,et al.  Accuracy of geolocation estimates for flying seabirds , 2004 .

[30]  D. Kobayashi,et al.  Turtles on the edge: movement of loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta) along oceanic fronts, spanning longline fishing grounds in the central North Pacific, 1997–1998 , 2000 .

[31]  H. Weimerskirch,et al.  Exploitation of distant Antarctic waters and close shelf-break waters by white-chinned petrels rearing chicks , 2000 .

[32]  David C. Douglas,et al.  Satellite Telemetry: A New Tool for Wildlife Research and Management, , 1988 .

[33]  Daniel P. Costa,et al.  FORAGING ECOLOGY OF NORTHERN ELEPHANT SEALS , 2000 .

[34]  H. Weimerskirch,et al.  Comparative activity pattern during foraging of four albatross species , 2002 .

[35]  Corey J. A. Bradshaw,et al.  The optimal spatial scale for the analysis of elephant seal foraging as determined by geo-location in relation to sea surface temperatures , 2002 .

[36]  C. Bost,et al.  Foraging behaviour of satellite-tracked king penguins in relation to sea-surface temperatures obtained by satellite telemetry at Crozet Archipelago, a study during three austral summers , 1997 .

[37]  J. Warham.  CHAPTER 12 – Petrels and Man , 1996 .

[38]  D. J. Anderson,et al.  NOCTURNAL AND DIURNAL FORAGING ACTIVITY OF HAWAIIAN ALBATROSSES DETECTED WITH A NEW IMMERSION MONITOR , 2000 .

[39]  H. Weimerskirch,et al.  Satellite tracking of Wandering albatrosses , 1990, Nature.

[40]  D. Costa,et al.  Fast and fuel efficient? Optimal use of wind by flying albatrosses , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[41]  R. M. Laws,et al.  Elephant seals : population ecology, behavior, and physiology , 1994 .

[42]  C. Hull.  Comparative diving behaviour and segregation of the marine habitat by breeding Royal Penguins , 2000 .

[43]  L. S. Davis,et al.  Satellite tracking of Adélie penguins , 1992, Polar Biology.

[44]  Henri Weimerskirch,et al.  GPS Tracking of Foraging Albatrosses , 2002, Science.

[45]  C. Pennycuick,et al.  Foraging flights of the White-tailed Tropicbird Phaethon lepturus : radiotracking and doubly-labelled water , 1990 .

[46]  K. Pütz.  SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL VARIABILITY IN THE FORAGING AREAS OF BREEDING KING PENGUINS , 2002 .