AEB effectiveness evaluation based on car-to-cyclist accident reconstructions using video of drive recorder

Abstract Objective: Though autonomous emergency braking (AEB) systems for car-to-cyclist collisions have been under development, an estimate of the benefit of AEB systems based on an analysis of accident data is needed for further enhancing their development. Compared to the data available from in-depth accident data files, data provided by drive recorders can be used to reconstruct car-to-cyclist collisions with greater accuracy because the position of cyclists can be observed from the videos. In this study, using data from drive recorders, the performance and limitations of AEB systems were investigated. Method: Data of drive recorders involving taxi-to-cyclist collisions were collected. Using the images collected from the drive recorders of those taxis, 40 cases of 90° car-to-cyclist intersection collisions were reconstructed using PC-Crash. Then, the collisions were reconstructed again utilizing car models with AEB systems installed while changing the sensor’s field of view (FOV) and the delay time of initiating vehicle deceleration. Results: The angle of FOV has a significant influence on avoiding car-to-cyclist collisions. Using a 50° FOV with a braking delay time of 0.5 s resulted in avoiding 6 collisions, and using a 90° FOV resulted in avoiding an additional 14 collisions. Even when installing an ideal AEB system providing 360° FOV and no delay time for braking, 8 collisions were not avoided, though the impact velocities were reduced for all of these remaining collisions. These collisions were caused by the cyclists’ sudden appearance in front of cars, and the time-to-collision (TTC) when the cyclists appeared was less than 0.9 s. Conclusion: The AEB systems were effective for mitigating collisions that occurred due to driver perception delay. Because cyclists have a traveling velocity, a wide-angle FOV is effective for reduction of car-to-cyclist intersection collisions. The reduction of delay time in braking can reduce the number of collisions that are close to the braking performance limit. The collisions that remained even with an ideal AEB system in the PC-Crash simulation indicate that such collisions could still occur for autonomous cars if the traffic environment does not change.

[1]  Andreas Eidehall,et al.  Benefit estimation model for pedestrian auto brake functionality , 2010 .

[2]  Helena Stigson,et al.  Literature review of pedestrian fatality risk as a function of car impact speed. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  Koji Mizuno,et al.  Analysis of Vulnerable Road User Kinematics Before/During/After Vehicle Collisions Based on Video Records , 2017 .

[4]  Kip Smith,et al.  Pedestrian injury mitigation by autonomous braking. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  Erik Rosen,et al.  Autonomous Emergency Braking for Vulnerable Road Users , 2013 .

[6]  Koji Mizuno,et al.  Difference between car-to-cyclist crash and near crash in a perpendicular crash configuration based on driving recorder analysis. , 2018, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  Arturo Furones,et al.  Benefits Assessment of Autonomous Emergency Braking Pedestrian Systems Based on Real World Accidents Reconstruction , 2015 .

[8]  Brian C Tefft,et al.  Impact speed and a pedestrian's risk of severe injury or death. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  Near Crashes as Crash Surrogate for Naturalistic Driving Studies , 2010 .

[10]  Mervyn Edwards,et al.  Assessment of Integrated Pedestrian Protection Systems with Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) and Passive Safety Components , 2015, Traffic injury prevention.

[11]  Oliver Bartels,et al.  An Open Simulation Approach to Identify Chances and Limitations for Vulnerable Road User (VRU) Active Safety , 2013, Traffic injury prevention.

[12]  Masahito Hitosugi,et al.  Analysis of car-to-bicycle approach patterns for developing active safety devices , 2016, Traffic injury prevention.

[13]  Zhiyong Yin,et al.  Pedestrian Injury Patterns and Risk in Minibus Collisions in China , 2015, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[14]  Rikard Fredriksson,et al.  Integrated Bicyclist Protection Systems - Potential of Head Injury Reduction Combining Passive and Active Protection Systems , 2015 .

[15]  Anders Kullgren,et al.  Assessment of Integrated Pedestrian Protection Systems with Forward Collision Warning and Automated Emergency Braking , 2015 .

[16]  Jeroen Uittenbogaard,et al.  Cyclist target and test setup for evaluation of cyclist-autonomous emergency braking , 2017 .

[17]  Ruth Welsh,et al.  Time-to-collision analysis of pedestrian and pedal-cycle accidents for the development of autonomous emergency braking systems. , 2018, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[18]  Mervyn Edwards,et al.  Estimate of Potential Benefit for Europe of Fitting Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) Systems for Pedestrian Protection to Passenger Cars , 2014, Traffic injury prevention.

[19]  Nobuyuki Uchida,et al.  Driver behavior in car-to-pedestrian incidents: An application of the Driving Reliability and Error Analysis Method (DREAM). , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.