Criteria for acceptable levels of the Shinkansen Super Express train noise and vibration in residential areas

A survey of 1187 housewives living in 18 areas along the Shinkansen Super Express (bullet train) railway was conducted by means of a self-administered health questionnaire (modified Cornell Medical Index). In addition, geographically corresponding measurements of noise level and vibration intensity were taken. The relationship of noise and vibration to positive responses (health complaints) related to bodily symptoms, illness and emotional disturbances was analyzed. The factors which correlated with an increase in the average number of positive responses included noise, vibration, age and health status. Such factors as marital status, educational level, part time work, duration of inhabitancy and occupation of the head of the houshold correlated poorly with the number of positive responses. Unhealthy respondents compared to healthy respondents are more frequently affected by noise and vibration. The rate of positive responses in the visual, respiratory, cardiovascular, digestive and nervous systems, sleep disturbances and emotional disturbances increased accordingly as noise and vibration increased. Combined effects of noise and vibration stimuli on the total number of positive responses (an indicator of general health) were found. This study has produced results indicating that the maximum permissible noise level should not exceed 70 dB(A) in the residential areas along the Shinkansen railway.

[1]  I. D. Griffiths,et al.  Subjective response to road traffic noise , 1968 .

[2]  K. Brodman,et al.  The Cornell Medical Index-Health Questionnaire VII: the prediction of psychosomatic and psychiatric disabilities in Army training. , 1954, The American journal of psychiatry.

[3]  W. Tempest,et al.  Are our noise laws adequate , 1973 .

[4]  Tadamoto Nimura,et al.  Noise Problems with High-Speed Railways in Japan , 1975 .

[5]  F. J. Langdon.  Noise nuisance caused by road traffic in residential areas: Part III , 1976 .

[6]  Chikio Hayashi.  On the prediction of phenomena from qualitative data and the quantification of qualitative data from the mathematico-statistical point of view , 1951 .

[7]  H. Wolff,et al.  The Cornell medical index; a adjunct to medical interview. , 1949, Journal of the American Medical Association.

[8]  H. Tyroler,et al.  Cornell Medical Index response as a predictor of mortality. , 1972, British journal of preventive & social medicine.

[9]  THE EFFECT OF WHOLE-BODY VIBRATION ON HUMAN PERFORMANCE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS , 1977 .

[10]  J. Abramson.  The cornell medical index as an epidemiological tool. , 1966, American journal of public health and the nation's health.

[11]  Yoshiharu Yonekawa.  EVALUATION OF BULLET TRAIN VIBRATION FOR RESIDENTS NEAR RAILWAYS , 1977 .

[12]  J. Abramson,et al.  Cornell Medical Index as a health measure in epidemiological studies. A test of the validity of a health questionnaire. , 1965, British journal of preventive & social medicine.

[13]  K. Brodman,et al.  The Cornell Medical Index-Health Questionnaire. II. As a diagnostic instrument. , 1951, Journal of the American Medical Association.