Directional connectivity in hydrology and ecology.

Quantifying hydrologic and ecological connectivity has contributed to understanding transport and dispersal processes and assessing ecosystem degradation or restoration potential. However, there has been little synthesis across disciplines. The growing field of ecohydrology and recent recognition that loss of hydrologic connectivity is leading to a global decline in biodiversity underscore the need for a unified connectivity concept. One outstanding need is a way to quantify directional connectivity that is consistent, robust to variations in sampling, and transferable across scales or environmental settings. Understanding connectivity in a particular direction (e.g., streamwise, along or across gradient, between sources and sinks, along cardinal directions) provides critical information for predicting contaminant transport, planning conservation corridor design, and understanding how landscapes or hydroscapes respond to directional forces like wind or water flow. Here we synthesize progress on quantifying connectivity and develop a new strategy for evaluating directional connectivity that benefits from use of graph theory in ecology and percolation theory in hydrology. The directional connectivity index (DCI) is a graph-theory based, multiscale metric that is generalizable to a range of different structural and functional connectivity applications. It exhibits minimal sensitivity to image rotation or resolution within a given range and responds intuitively to progressive, unidirectional change. Further, it is linearly related to the integral connectivity scale length--a metric common in hydrology that correlates well with actual fluxes--but is less computationally challenging and more readily comparable across different landscapes. Connectivity-orientation curves (i.e., directional connectivity computed over a range of headings) provide a quantitative, information-dense representation of environmental structure that can be used for comparison or detection of subtle differences in the physical-biological feedbacks driving pattern formation. Case-study application of the DCI to the Everglades in south Florida revealed that loss of directional hydrologic connectivity occurs more rapidly and is a more sensitive indicator of declining ecosystem function than other metrics (e.g., habitat area) used previously. Here and elsewhere, directional connectivity can provide insight into landscape drivers and processes, act as an early-warning indicator of environmental degradation, and serve as a planning tool or performance measure for conservation and restoration efforts.

[1]  J. Reynolds,et al.  A Simulation Experiment to Quantify Spatial Heterogeneity in Categorical Maps , 1994 .

[2]  Phaedon C. Kyriakidis,et al.  Forward and Inverse Transformations between Cartesian and Channel-fitted Coordinate Systems for Meandering Rivers , 2007 .

[3]  Louise J. Bracken,et al.  The concept of hydrological connectivity and its contribution to understanding runoff‐dominated geomorphic systems , 2007 .

[4]  L. Larsen,et al.  Modeling of hydroecological feedbacks predicts distinct classes of landscape pattern, process, and restoration potential in shallow aquatic ecosystems , 2011 .

[5]  Ken Rutchey,et al.  An analysis of spatial complexity of ridge and slough patterns in the Everglades ecosystem , 2006 .

[6]  Carlo Ricotta,et al.  Quantifying the network connectivity of landscape mosaics: a graph-theoretical approach , 2000 .

[7]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  How well do indicator variograms capture the spatial connectivity of soil moisture , 1998 .

[8]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  On the use of connectivity measures in spatial ecology , 2001 .

[9]  Lynn W. Gelhar,et al.  Stochastic subsurface hydrology from theory to applications , 1986 .

[10]  Timothy H. Keitt,et al.  LANDSCAPE CONNECTIVITY: A GRAPH‐THEORETIC PERSPECTIVE , 2001 .

[11]  L. Larsen,et al.  How Vegetation and Sediment Transport Feedbacks Drive Landscape Change in the Everglades and Wetlands Worldwide , 2010, The American Naturalist.

[12]  L. Fahrig,et al.  On the usage and measurement of landscape connectivity , 2000 .

[13]  Brett J. Goodwin,et al.  Is landscape connectivity a dependent or independent variable? , 2003, Landscape Ecology.

[14]  C. Pringle HYDROLOGIC CONNECTIVITY AND THE MANAGEMENT OF BIOLOGICAL RESERVES: A GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE , 2001 .

[15]  Jay M. Ver Hoef,et al.  Geostatistical modelling on stream networks: developing valid covariance matrices based on hydrologic distance and stream flow , 2007 .

[16]  J. Wiens The Emerging Role of Patchiness in Conservation Biology , 1997 .

[17]  J. Wainwright,et al.  Linking environmental régimes, space and time: Interpretations of structural and functional connectivity , 2008 .

[18]  Jianguo Wu Effects of changing scale on landscape pattern analysis: scaling relations , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[19]  Donald E. Weller,et al.  Improved methods for quantifying potential nutrient interception by riparian buffers , 2006, Landscape Ecology.

[20]  Fu‐Chun Wu,et al.  Variation of Roughness Coefficients for Unsubmerged and Submerged Vegetation , 1999 .

[21]  Efi Foufoula-Georgiou,et al.  Study of self-similar and self-affine objects using logarithmic correlation integral , 1995 .

[22]  David R. Miller,et al.  Some effects of surrounding forest canopy architecture on the wind field in small clearings , 1991 .

[23]  Richard T. T. Forman,et al.  Landscape graphs: Ecological modeling with graph theory to detect configurations common to diverse landscapes , 1993, Landscape Ecology.

[24]  E. Addink,et al.  Linking Flow Regime, Floodplain Lake Connectivity and Fish Catch in a Large River-Floodplain System, the Volga–Akhtuba Floodplain (Russian Federation) , 2011, Ecosystems.

[25]  A. Brad Murray,et al.  A new quantitative test of geomorphic models, applied to a model of braided streams , 1996 .

[26]  J. Reynolds,et al.  A new contagion index to quantify spatial patterns of landscapes , 1993, Landscape Ecology.

[27]  André G. Roy,et al.  Revisiting Hydrologic Sampling Strategies for an Accurate Assessment of Hydrologic Connectivity in Humid Temperate Systems , 2009 .

[28]  B. Bond,et al.  Understanding ecohydrological connectivity in savannas: a system dynamics modelling approach , 2012 .

[29]  L. Levin,et al.  Connectivity Conservation: Connectivity in marine ecosystems: the importance of larval and spore dispersal , 2006 .

[30]  David A. Kinner,et al.  Linking runoff response to burn severity after a wildfire , 2008 .

[31]  L. Fahrig,et al.  How should we measure landscape connectivity? , 2000, Landscape Ecology.

[32]  Kelly K. Caylor,et al.  Characterizing ecohydrological and biogeochemical connectivity across multiple scales: a new conceptual framework , 2012 .

[33]  B. O’Connor,et al.  Hydroecological factors governing surface water flow on a low‐gradient floodplain , 2009 .

[34]  Danielle L. Watts,et al.  Hydrologic Modification and the Loss of Self-organized Patterning in the Ridge–Slough Mosaic of the Everglades , 2010, Ecosystems.

[35]  Kevin J. Gutzwiller,et al.  Interception of moving organisms: influences of patch shape, size, and orientation on community structure , 1992, Landscape Ecology.

[36]  K. Tockner,et al.  Riverine landscape diversity , 2002 .

[37]  W. Kunin,et al.  Extrapolating species abundance across spatial scales , 1998, Science.

[38]  M. Nungesser,et al.  Reading the landscape: temporal and spatial changes in a patterned peatland , 2011, Wetlands Ecology and Management.

[39]  J. Berge,et al.  Tucker's congruence coefficient as a meaningful index of factor similarity. , 2006 .

[40]  André G. Roy,et al.  Shopping for hydrologically representative connectivity metrics in a humid temperate forested catchment , 2010 .

[41]  Jesús Carrera,et al.  On the relationship between indicators of geostatistical, flow and transport connectivity , 2005 .

[42]  J. Crimaldi,et al.  Predicting bed shear stress and its role in sediment dynamics and restoration potential of the Everglades and other vegetated flow systems. , 2009 .

[43]  J. Ogden Everglades ridge and slough conceptual ecological model , 2005, Wetlands.

[44]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Habitat Patch Connectivity and Population Survival , 1985 .

[45]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure , 1993 .

[46]  Graham E. Fogg,et al.  Role of Molecular Diffusion in Contaminant Migration and Recovery in an Alluvial Aquifer System , 2001 .

[47]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  SIMPLE CONNECTIVITY MEASURES IN SPATIAL ECOLOGY , 2002 .

[48]  Steven M Gorelick,et al.  Effective permeability of porous media containing branching channel networks. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[49]  Kurt H. Riitters,et al.  Sensitivity of landscape metrics to pixel size , 1995 .

[50]  Hong S. He,et al.  An aggregation index (AI) to quantify spatial patterns of landscapes , 2000, Landscape Ecology.

[51]  R. O'Neill,et al.  Scale problems in reporting landscape pattern at the regional scale , 1996, Landscape Ecology.

[52]  John W. Pomeroy,et al.  Connectivity and runoff dynamics in heterogeneous basins , 2011 .

[53]  John Wainwright,et al.  Hydrological connectivity: Linking concepts with practical implications , 2009 .

[54]  Nathan H. Schumaker,et al.  Using Landscape Indices to Predict Habitat Connectivity , 1996 .

[55]  R. Grayson,et al.  Toward capturing hydrologically significant connectivity in spatial patterns , 2001 .

[56]  Donald B. Johnson,et al.  Efficient Algorithms for Shortest Paths in Sparse Networks , 1977, J. ACM.

[57]  Jean-Raynald de Dreuzy,et al.  Use of power averaging for quantifying the influence of structure organization on permeability upscaling in on‐lattice networks under mean parallel flow , 2010 .

[58]  K. Takara,et al.  Input data resolution analysis for distributed hydrological modeling , 2006 .

[59]  Susana Bautista,et al.  Measurement of the connectivity of runoff source areas as determined by vegetation pattern and topography: A tool for assessing potential water and soil losses in drylands , 2008 .

[60]  Robert C. Frohn,et al.  Remote Sensing for Landscape Ecology: New Metric Indicators for Monitoring, Modeling, and Assessment of Ecosystems , 1998 .

[61]  Santiago Saura,et al.  Measuring connectivity in habitat mosaics: the equivalence of two existing network indices and progress beyond them , 2010 .

[62]  J. Nassauer,et al.  Limitations of using landscape pattern indices to evaluate the ecological consequences of alternative plans and designs , 2005 .

[63]  Brian Berkowitz,et al.  PERCOLATION THEORY AND ITS APPLICATION TO GROUNDWATER HYDROLOGY , 1993 .

[64]  Justin M. Calabrese,et al.  A comparison-shopper's guide to connectivity metrics , 2004 .