Sustainability assessment framework for low rise commercial buildings: life cycle impact index-based approach

The building industry has regularly been criticized for resource exploitation, energy use, waste production, greenhouse gas emissions, and impacts on the landscape. The growing population demands more built environment to accommodate the socioeconomic wellbeing. Adopting conventional construction practices would continue the aforementioned issues. Therefore, it is important to integrate life cycle thinking into building construction to minimize its social, environmental, and economic impacts. The objective of this study is to assess the life cycle impact of commonly used wall–roof systems for low rise commercial building construction in Canada. A framework is developed to assess different building alternatives using the triple bottom line of sustainability. Identified environmental and socioeconomic impact indicators are eventually aggregated to develop a life cycle impact index. Material quantities of six wall–roof combinations for a single-storey commercial building were obtained from industrial partners. State-of-the-art life cycle assessment software is used to assess the life cycle impacts of different wall–roof systems. To accommodate decision makers’ preferences of sustainability, wall–roof combinations are assessed for three potential scenarios namely, eco-centric, neutral, and economy-centric using multi-criteria decision analysis. The framework has also been implemented on a case study of low rise building in Calgary (Alberta, Canada) to evaluate its practicality. The study results revealed that the concrete–steel building is the most sustainable alternative in neutral and economy-centric scenario while steel–wood building is the most sustainable building in eco-centric scenario.

[1]  Borong Lin,et al.  Integrated assessment method for building life cycle environmental and economic performance , 2008 .

[2]  Rehan Sadiq,et al.  Sustainability assessment of flooring systems in the city of Tehran: An AHP-based life cycle analysis , 2011 .

[3]  Luisa F. Cabeza,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review , 2014 .

[4]  Solomon Tesfamariam,et al.  Inter-Utility Performance Benchmarking Model for Small-to-Medium-Sized Water Utilities: Aggregated Performance Indices , 2016 .

[5]  Ke Li,et al.  Environmental Impacts over the Life Cycle of Residential Buildings Using Different Exterior Wall Systems , 2009 .

[6]  Marzia Traverso,et al.  Towards a life cycle sustainability assessment: making informed choices on products , 2011 .

[7]  Walter Kloepffer,et al.  Life cycle sustainability assessment of products , 2008 .

[8]  Chimay J. Anumba,et al.  Achieving sustainability in construction projects through concurrent engineering , 2003 .

[9]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Sustainable construction taking into account the building impact on the environment , 2010 .

[10]  Robin Spence,et al.  Sustainable development and the construction industry , 1995 .

[11]  Gregory A. Keoleian,et al.  Life cycle energy and environmental performance of a new university building: modeling challenges and design implications , 2003 .

[12]  Jamie Goggins,et al.  The assessment of embodied energy in typical reinforced concrete building structures in Ireland , 2010 .

[13]  Lawrence C. Bank,et al.  Decision-making tools for evaluating the impact of materials selection on the carbon footprint of buildings , 2011 .

[14]  Rajeev Ruparathna,et al.  Emergy based procurement framework to improve sustainability performance in construction. , 2013 .

[15]  Rehan Sadiq,et al.  AHP based life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) framework: a case study of six storey wood frame and concrete frame buildings in Vancouver , 2015 .

[16]  John W. Bull,et al.  Life Cycle Costing for Construction , 2003 .

[17]  Andrew D.F. Price,et al.  Assessing the recycling potential of glass fibre reinforced plastic waste in concrete and cement composites , 2009 .

[18]  David R. Riley,et al.  Sustainable performance criteria for construction method selection in concrete buildings , 2010 .

[19]  David Hillier,et al.  Corporate social responsibility and the UK construction industry , 2006 .

[20]  K. Wübbenhorst,et al.  Life cycle costing for construction projects , 1986 .

[21]  B. Weidema,et al.  Monetary valuation in Life Cycle Assessment: a review , 2015 .

[22]  Jamie Meil,et al.  A life cycle environmental and economic assessment of optimum value engineering in houses , 2006 .

[23]  Paul Olomolaiye,et al.  Development of sustainable assessment criteria for building materials selection , 2012 .

[24]  Taehoon Hong,et al.  Comparative analysis of methods for integrating various environmental impacts as a single index in life cycle assessment , 2016 .

[25]  M Osmani,et al.  Architects' perspectives on construction waste reduction by design. , 2008, Waste management.

[26]  Eva Risch,et al.  How environmentally significant is water consumption during wastewater treatment? Application of recent developments in LCA to WWT technologies used at 3 contrasted geographical locations. , 2014, Water research.

[27]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  Critical Review of the Current Research Needs and Limitations Related to ISO-LCA Practice , 2008 .

[28]  Heng Li,et al.  Application of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in multi-criteria analysis of the selection of intelligent building systems , 2008 .

[29]  Abimbola Windapo,et al.  Construction sector views of sustainable building materials , 2014 .

[30]  Catarina Thormark,et al.  The effect of material choice on the total energy need and recycling potential of a building , 2006 .

[31]  Dominique Derome,et al.  Using life cycle assessment to derive an environmental index for light-frame wood wall assemblies , 2010 .

[32]  Ravi Prakash,et al.  Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: An overview , 2010 .

[33]  Andrew D.F. Price,et al.  Sustainability and the UK construction industry—a review , 2003 .

[34]  Lars-Gunnar Lindfors,et al.  On the nordic guidelines for life cycle assessment , 1996 .

[35]  Varun,et al.  Life cycle assessment of buildings: A review , 2011 .

[36]  Robert H. Crawford,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment in the Built Environment , 2011 .

[37]  Robert Ries,et al.  Comparison of energy-based indicators used in life cycle assessment tools for buildings , 2014 .

[38]  Rehan Sadiq,et al.  Emergy-based life cycle assessment (Em-LCA) for sustainability appraisal of infrastructure systems: a case study on paved roads , 2014, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[39]  P. Koele MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE DECISION MAKING: AN INTRODUCTION, Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-104, K. Paul Yoon and Ching-Lai Hwang, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1995, 73 pp., ISBN 0-8039-5486-7. , 1997 .

[40]  Yacine Rezgui,et al.  Promoting Sustainability Awareness through Energy Engaged Virtual Communities of Construction Stakeholders , 2010, PRO-VE.

[41]  Lukumon O. Oyedele,et al.  Lifecycle Environmental Performance of Materials Specifications: A BIM Enhanced Comparative Assessment , 2021 .

[42]  Haradhan Kumar Mohajan,et al.  Sustainable Development Policy of Global Economy , 2015 .

[43]  Walter Klöpffer,et al.  Life cycle assessment , 1997, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[44]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple attribute decision making : an introduction , 1995 .

[45]  A. Sev How can the construction industry contribute to sustainable development? A conceptual framework , 2009 .

[46]  Arjen Ysbert Hoekstra,et al.  The Water Footprint Assessment Manual , 2011 .

[47]  Navid Hossaini Fard Emergy-based sustainability rating system for buildings : case study of Canada , 2012 .

[48]  Lena Vogler,et al.  Sustainable Construction Green Building Design And Delivery , 2016 .

[49]  R. Fellows,et al.  Impact of participants' values on construction sustainability , 2008 .

[50]  Kari Alanne,et al.  The effect of material selection on life cycle energy balance: A case study on a hypothetical building model in Finland , 2015 .

[51]  Mark Hughes,et al.  A multidisciplinary approach to sustainable building material selection: A case study in a Finnish context , 2014 .

[52]  David E. Shiers,et al.  The Green Guide to Specification: An Environmental Profiling System for Building Materials and Components , 2002 .

[53]  M. Goedkoop,et al.  The Eco-indicator 99, A damage oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment , 1999 .

[54]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[55]  Angela Smyth,et al.  The green guide , 1990 .

[56]  Kasun Hewage,et al.  Sustainable procurement in the Canadian construction industry: challenges and benefits , 2015 .

[57]  Chen Yao Integrated assessment methods for forest resource assets. , 2009 .

[58]  John S. Monahan,et al.  An embodied carbon and energy analysis of modern methods of construction in housing: A case study us , 2011 .

[59]  Chris Fortune,et al.  Sustainable development policy perceptions and practice in the UK social housing sector , 2007 .

[60]  Lei Xu,et al.  The life-cycle assessment of a single-storey retail building in Canada , 2012 .

[61]  P. Quintas,et al.  Knowledge across cultures in the construction industry: sustainability, innovation and design , 2006 .