Estimates of stress drop and crustal tectonic stress from the 27 February 2010 Maule, Chile, earthquake: Implications for fault strength

[1] The great 27 February 2010 Mw 8.8 earthquake off the coast of southern Chile ruptured a ∼600 km length of subduction zone. In this paper, we make two independent estimates of shear stress in the crust in the region of the Chile earthquake. First, we use a coseismic slip model constrained by geodetic observations from interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) and GPS to derive a spatially variable estimate of the change in static shear stress along the ruptured fault. Second, we use a static force balance model to constrain the crustal shear stress required to simultaneously support observed fore-arc topography and the stress orientation indicated by the earthquake focal mechanism. This includes the derivation of a semianalytic solution for the stress field exerted by surface and Moho topography loading the crust. We find that the deviatoric stress exerted by topography is minimized in the limit when the crust is considered an incompressible elastic solid, with a Poisson ratio of 0.5, and is independent of Young's modulus. This places a strict lower bound on the critical stress state maintained by the crust supporting plastically deformed accretionary wedge topography. We estimate the coseismic shear stress change from the Maule event ranged from −6 MPa (stress increase) to 17 MPa (stress drop), with a maximum depth-averaged crustal shear-stress drop of 4 MPa. We separately estimate that the plate-driving forces acting in the region, regardless of their exact mechanism, must contribute at least 27 MPa trench-perpendicular compression and 15 MPa trench-parallel compression. This corresponds to a depth-averaged shear stress of at least 7 MPa. The comparable magnitude of these two independent shear stress estimates is consistent with the interpretation that the section of the megathrust fault ruptured in the Maule earthquake is weak, with the seismic cycle relieving much of the total sustained shear stress in the crust.

[1]  R. Madariaga,et al.  The 2010 Mw 8.8 Maule Megathrust Earthquake of Central Chile, Monitored by GPS , 2011, Science.

[2]  James Foster,et al.  Coseismic slip distribution of the February 27, 2010 Mw 8.8 Maule, Chile earthquake , 2011 .

[3]  John McCloskey,et al.  Limited overlap between the seismic gap and coseismic slip of the great 2010 Chile earthquake , 2011 .

[4]  Masanobu Shimada,et al.  The 2010 Maule, Chile earthquake: Downdip rupture limit revealed by space geodesy , 2010 .

[5]  A. Tassara.  Control of forearc density structure on megathrust shear strength along the Chilean subduction zone , 2010 .

[6]  S. Lee,et al.  Moho map of South America from receiver functions and surface waves , 2010 .

[7]  M. Moreno,et al.  2010 Maule earthquake slip correlates with pre-seismic locking of Andean subduction zone , 2010, Nature.

[8]  J. Nocquet,et al.  Slip distribution of the February 27, 2010 Mw = 8.8 Maule Earthquake, central Chile, from static and high‐rate GPS, InSAR, and broadband teleseismic data , 2010 .

[9]  D. Sandwell,et al.  Ocean loading effects on stress at near shore plate boundary fault systems , 2010 .

[10]  Hiroo Kanamori,et al.  Teleseismic inversion for rupture process of the 27 February 2010 Chile (Mw 8.8) earthquake , 2010 .

[11]  Masanobu Shimada,et al.  Advanced Land Observing Satellite (ALOS) and Monitoring Global Environmental Change , 2010, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[12]  R. Madariaga,et al.  Central Chile Finally Breaks , 2010, Science.

[13]  David T. Sandwell,et al.  Coseismic slip model of the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake derived from joint inversion of interferometric synthetic aperture radar, GPS, and field data , 2010 .

[14]  Central Chile finally breaks , 2010 .

[15]  D. Fabre,et al.  Global Bathymetry and Elevation Data at 30 Arc Seconds Resolution: SRTM30_PLUS , 2009 .

[16]  F. Leyton,et al.  Intraplate and interplate earthquakes in chilean subduction zone: a theoretical and observational comparison , 2009 .

[17]  T. Seno.  Determination of the pore fluid pressure ratio at seismogenic megathrusts in subduction zones: Implications for strength of asperities and Andean‐type mountain building , 2009 .

[18]  Peter M. Shearer,et al.  Global variations of stress drop for moderate to large earthquakes , 2009 .

[19]  Walter H. F. Smith,et al.  Global marine gravity from retracked Geosat and ERS‐1 altimetry: Ridge segmentation versus spreading rate , 2009 .

[20]  J. Hardebeck,et al.  Earthquake Stress Drops and Inferred Fault Strength on the Hayward Fault , 2008 .

[21]  Masanobu Shimada,et al.  Accuracy and Resolution of ALOS Interferometry: Vector Deformation Maps of the Father's Day Intrusion at Kilauea , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[22]  K. Priestley,et al.  New views on the structure and rheology of the lithosphere , 2008, Journal of the Geological Society.

[23]  N. K. Pavlis,et al.  Earth Gravitational Model 2008 , 2008 .

[24]  Howard A. Zebker,et al.  ScanSAR-to-Stripmap Mode Interferometry Processing Using ENVISAT/ASAR Data , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[25]  E. Cowgill,et al.  Determination of fault friction from reactivation of abyssal-hill faults in subduction zones , 2006 .

[26]  Y. Bock,et al.  Modulation of the earthquake cycle at the southern San Andreas fault by lake loading , 2006 .

[27]  S. Lamb.  Shear stresses on megathrusts: Implications for mountain building behind subduction zones , 2006 .

[28]  S. Shapiro,et al.  Seismic Images of Accretive and Erosive Subduction Zones from the Chilean Margin , 2006 .

[29]  D. Sandwell,et al.  A three-dimensional semianalytic viscoelastic model for time-dependent analyses of the earthquake cycle , 2004 .

[30]  A. Michael,et al.  Stress orientations at intermediate angles to the San Andreas Fault, California , 2004 .

[31]  P. Mai,et al.  Fast computation of static stress changes on 2D faults from final slip distributions , 2004 .

[32]  Y. Fialko.  Probing the mechanical properties of seismically active crust with space geodesy: Study of the coseismic deformation due to the 1992 Mw7.3 Landers (southern California) earthquake , 2004 .

[33]  Paul Davis,et al.  Cenozoic climate change as a possible cause for the rise of the Andes , 2003, Nature.

[34]  M. Bevis,et al.  Crustal motion in the Southern Andes (26°–36°S): Do the Andes behave like a microplate? , 2003 .

[35]  M. Bevis,et al.  The Nazca -South America Euler vector and its rate of change , 2003 .

[36]  S. Sobolev,et al.  Moho topography in the central Andes and its geodynamic implications , 2002 .

[37]  M. Zoback.  Earth science: Strength of the San Andreas , 2000, Nature.

[38]  Christopher H. Scholz,et al.  Evidence for a strong San Andreas fault , 2000 .

[39]  J. Chéry,et al.  Quantification of interplate coupling in subduction zones and forearc topography , 1997 .

[40]  Michael Eineder,et al.  ScanSAR processing using standard high precision SAR algorithms , 1996, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[41]  Shijie Zhong,et al.  Controls on trench topography from dynamic models of subducted slabs , 1994 .

[42]  M. Zoback.  First‐ and second‐order patterns of stress in the lithosphere: The World Stress Map Project , 1992 .

[43]  Y. Okada.  Internal deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space , 1992, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[44]  F. A. Dahlen,et al.  CRITICAL TAPER MODEL OF FOLD-AND-THRUST BELTS AND ACCRETIONARY WEDGES , 1990 .

[45]  Ian Parsons,et al.  Surface deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space , 1986 .

[46]  F. Dahlen.  Isostasy and the ambient state of stress in the oceanic lithosphere , 1981 .

[47]  D. J. Andrews,et al.  A stochastic fault model: 1. Static case , 1980 .

[48]  J. Byerlee.  Friction of rocks , 1978 .

[49]  J. Steketee.  ON VOLTERRA'S DISLOCATIONS IN A SEMI-INFINITE ELASTIC MEDIUM , 1958 .

[50]  A. Love.  The Stress Produced in a Semi-Infinite Solid by Pressure on Part of the Boundary , 1929 .