The Impact of Motivation and Personality on Academic Performance in Online and Blended Learning Environments

This study investigates the impact of students’ motivation and personality traits on their academic performance in online and blended learning environments. It was conducted with students attending a mandatory introductory information technology course given in a university in Turkey. The Big Five Inventory and Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire were completed by a total of 316 students. A learning management system (LMS) was used for online collaboration and accessing course materials. At the end of the course, information on the accessibility of LMS and students’ academic performance including their exam results was obtained. The Bayesian Structural Equation Modeling was used to examine academic performance in terms of its relationship with motivation and personality. In the online learning environment, the results showed that the conscientiousness trait was significantly related to LMS use whereas in blended learning, there were no significant relations between personality traits and LMS use. Self-efficacy was found to be the predictor of LMS use in the online environment while task value and test anxiety were the predictors in the blended learning environment. Conscientiousness and LMS use were significantly related to course grades in both learning environments. Finally, self-efficacy for learning performance was also associated with course grades in the online learning environment.

[1]  Michael J. Hannafin,et al.  Guidelines for using locus of instructional control in the design of computer-assisted instruction , 1984 .

[2]  O. John,et al.  Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. , 2008 .

[3]  Lázaro Rodríguez Ariza,et al.  Blended learning in higher education: Students' perceptions and their relation to outcomes , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[4]  Sik-Yum Lee,et al.  Bayesian Analysis of Structural Equation Models With Nonlinear Covariates and Latent Variables , 2006, Multivariate behavioral research.

[5]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Self-Motivation for Academic Attainment: The Role of Self-Efficacy Beliefs and Personal Goal Setting , 1992, American Educational Research Journal.

[6]  P. Pintrich.  A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). , 1991 .

[7]  Elizabeth Boyle,et al.  The relationship between personality, approach to learning and academic performance , 2004 .

[8]  S. Paunonen,et al.  Big Five personality predictors of post-secondary academic performance , 2007 .

[9]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  A power primer. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  A. Poropat.  A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. , 2009, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  Doo Hun Lim,et al.  ONLINE VS. BLENDED LEARNING: DIFFERENCES IN INSTRUCTIONAL OUTCOMES AND LEARNER SATISFACTION , 2019, Online Learning.

[12]  Snigdhansu Chatterjee,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling, A Bayesian Approach , 2008, Technometrics.

[13]  Mitsutoshi Okazaki,et al.  Revised NEO Personality Inventory（NEO-PI-R）を用いたてんかん患者におけるパーソナリティ傾向に関する検討 , 2018 .

[14]  Dan,et al.  Student Hits in an Internet-Supported Course: How Can Instructors Use Them and What Do They Mean?. , 2003 .

[15]  A. Furnham,et al.  Personality predicts academic performance: Evidence from two longitudinal university samples , 2003 .

[16]  D. Watson,et al.  General and specific traits of personality and their relation to sleep and academic performance. , 2002, Journal of personality.

[17]  Karen Swan,et al.  Building Learning Communities in Online Courses: the importance of interaction , 2002 .

[18]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. , 1990 .

[19]  Pia Rosander,et al.  Personality traits and general intelligence as predictors of academic performance: A structural equation modelling approach , 2011 .

[20]  Kenneth J. Klassen,et al.  Relationship Between Use of Online Support Materials and Student Performance in an Introductory Finance Course , 2005 .

[21]  H. Coates,et al.  A Critical Examination Of The Effects Of Learning Management Systems On University Teaching And Learning , 2005 .

[22]  S. Jeanne Horst,et al.  Evaluating existing and new validity evidence for the Academic Motivation Scale , 2005 .

[23]  Sarah Depaoli,et al.  Bayesian Statistical Methods , 2013 .

[24]  David M. Moore,et al.  Interaction of Cognitive Style and Learner Control in a Hypermedia Environment , 2000 .

[25]  Stuart A. Karabenick,et al.  Psychopathology and academic performance: The role of motivation and learning strategies. , 1995 .

[26]  S. Gosling,et al.  A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains , 2003 .

[27]  Buket Akkoyunlu,et al.  A Study of Student's Perceptions in a Blended Learning Environment Based on Different Learning Styles , 2008, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[28]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs , 2005 .

[29]  John R. Grandzol,et al.  Interaction in Online Courses: More is NOT Always Better , 2010 .

[30]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian Structural Equation Modeling , 2007 .

[31]  Wilbert J. McKeachie,et al.  College student intrinsic and/or extrinsic motivation and learning , 2003 .

[32]  M. Ashton,et al.  Big Five Predictors of Academic Achievement , 2001 .

[33]  Elizabeth A. Linnenbrink,et al.  Motivation as an Enabler for Academic Success , 2002 .

[34]  Kathleen Holt,et al.  A pattern analysis of students' achievement goals. , 1993 .

[35]  M. Dembo,et al.  The Relationship Between Self-Regulation and Online Learning in a Blended Learning Context , 2004 .

[36]  Kuan-Chung Chen,et al.  Motivation in online learning: Testing a model of self-determination theory , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[37]  A. P. Rovai,et al.  Blended Learning and Sense of Community: A Comparative Analysis with Traditional and Fully Online Graduate Courses , 2004 .

[38]  Eugenia Y. Huang,et al.  What type of learning style leads to online participation in the mixed-mode e-learning environment? A study of software usage instruction , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[39]  Eric Sundstrom,et al.  Intelligence, “Big Five” personality traits, and work drive as predictors of course grade , 2003 .

[40]  Charles R. Graham.  BLENDED LEARNING SYSTEMS: DEFINITION, CURRENT TRENDS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 2005 .

[41]  S. Srivastava,et al.  The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. , 1999 .

[42]  R. Robins,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES Personality Predictors of Academic Outcomes: Big Five Correlates of GPA and SAT Scores , 2007 .

[43]  Bengt Muthén,et al.  Bayesian SEM : A more flexible representation of substantive theory , 2010 .

[44]  Anthony R. Artino,et al.  Review of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. , 2005 .

[45]  R. Vallerand,et al.  Academic Motivation and School Performance: Toward a Structural Model , 1995 .

[46]  K. Fraccastoro,et al.  Personality Predicts Academic Performance: Exploring the moderating role of gender , 2005 .

[47]  Robert R. McCrae,et al.  Bibliography for the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R ™ ) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI ™ ) , 2003 .

[48]  M. Credé,et al.  A meta-analytic review of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire , 2011 .

[49]  R. Ellis,et al.  Quality in blended learning: Exploring the relationships between on-line and face-to-face teaching and learning , 2007, Internet High. Educ..

[50]  P. Costa,et al.  Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[51]  T. J. Berndt,et al.  Expectancies, values, and achievement in junior high school. , 1990 .

[52]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[53]  Rick H. Hoyle,et al.  Handbook of structural equation modeling , 2012 .

[54]  Jin-young Kim.  Effects of Personality Traits and Kolb Learning Styles on Learning Outcomes in a Blended Learning Environment , 2013 .