Interference Energy Spectrum of the Infinite Square Well

Certain superposition states of the 1-D infinite square well have transient zeros at locations other than the nodes of the eigenstates that comprise them. It is shown that if an infinite potential barrier is suddenly raised at some or all of these zeros, the well can be split into multiple adjacent infinite square wells without affecting the wavefunction. This effects a change of the energy eigenbasis of the state to a basis that does not commute with the original, and a subsequent measurement of the energy now reveals a completely different spectrum, which we call the interference energy spectrum of the state. This name is appropriate because the same splitting procedure applied at the stationary nodes of any eigenstate does not change the measurable energy of the state. Of particular interest, this procedure can result in measurable energies that are greater than the energy of the highest mode in the original superposition, raising questions about the conservation of energy akin to those that have been raised in the study of superoscillations. An analytic derivation is given for the interference spectrum of a given wavefunction Ψ ( x , t ) with N known zeros located at points s i = ( x i , t i ) . Numerical simulations were used to verify that a barrier can be rapidly raised at a zero of the wavefunction without significantly affecting it. The interpretation of this result with respect to the conservation of energy and the energy-time uncertainty relation is discussed, and the idea of alternate energy eigenbases is fleshed out. The question of whether or not a preferred discrete energy spectrum is an inherent feature of a particle’s quantum state is examined.

[1]  M. Hall,et al.  Prior information: How to circumvent the standard joint-measurement uncertainty relation , 2003, quant-ph/0309091.

[2]  D. Struppa,et al.  Superoscillating Sequences in Several Variables , 2016 .

[3]  D. C. Struppa,et al.  The mathematics of superoscillations , 2015, 1511.01938.

[4]  Harris,et al.  Efficient Nonlinear Frequency Conversion with Maximal Atomic Coherence. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[5]  Dae Gwan Lee,et al.  Direct Construction of Superoscillations , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[6]  Daniele C. Struppa,et al.  Some mathematical properties of superoscillations , 2011 .

[7]  Sandu Popescu,et al.  Evolution of quantum superoscillations, and optical superresolution without evanescent waves , 2006 .

[8]  Kumar,et al.  Observation of quantum frequency conversion. , 1992, Physical review letters.

[9]  R. Stolen,et al.  Parametric amplification and frequency conversion in optical fibers , 1982 .

[10]  Metiu,et al.  Laser-induced localization of an electron in a double-well quantum structure. , 1992, Physical review letters.

[11]  Achim Kempf,et al.  Construction of Aharonov–Berry's superoscillations , 2007 .

[12]  Helena Jelínková,et al.  Solid state lasers with Raman frequency conversion , 2004 .

[13]  G. Rowlands,et al.  Method for obtaining exact solutions of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation for a double-square-well potential , 2006 .

[14]  Spatial fragmentation of a Bose-Einstein condensate in a double-well potential , 1998, quant-ph/9810094.

[15]  M. Oberthaler,et al.  Single-particle tunneling in strongly driven double-well potentials. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[16]  Sebastian Deffner,et al.  Energy–time uncertainty relation for driven quantum systems , 2011, 1104.5104.

[17]  Statics and dynamics of Bose-Einstein condensates in double square well potentials. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[18]  D. Pritchard,et al.  Atom interferometry with Bose-Einstein condensates in a double-well potential. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[19]  Y. Aharonov,et al.  Superoscillations and tunneling times , 2001, quant-ph/0110104.

[20]  What is the value of an observable between pre- and postselection? [rapid communication] , 2003, quant-ph/0308137.

[21]  J. Jeffers,et al.  Quantum Hilbert Hotel. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[22]  W. Schleich,et al.  Multimode interference: Highly regular pattern formation in quantum wave-packet evolution , 2000 .

[23]  P. Meystre,et al.  Dynamics of Bose-Einstein condensates in double-well potentials , 2005 .

[24]  Experimental realization of spectral shaping using nonlinear optical holograms. , 2014, Optics letters.

[25]  D. Bohm,et al.  Time in the Quantum Theory and the Uncertainty Relation for Time and Energy , 1961 .

[26]  F. S. Guzmán,et al.  Solving the time-dependent Schrödinger equation using finite difference methods , 2008 .

[27]  Paulo Jorge S. G. Ferreira,et al.  The energy expense of superoscillations , 2002, 2002 11th European Signal Processing Conference.

[28]  T. Schumm,et al.  Matter-wave interferometry in a double well on an atom chip , 2005 .

[29]  M. Moshinsky Diffraction in time and the time–energy uncertainty relation , 1976 .

[30]  Irene Marzoli,et al.  Quantum carpets woven by Wigner functions , 2000 .

[31]  R. Spekkens Contextuality for preparations, transformations, and unsharp measurements , 2004, quant-ph/0406166.

[32]  A. Arie,et al.  Adiabatic processes in frequency conversion , 2014 .

[33]  D. Struppa,et al.  On Some Operators Associated to Superoscillations , 2013 .

[34]  Kobe,et al.  Derivation of the energy-time uncertainty relation. , 1994, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[35]  J. Dressel Weak Values as Interference Phenomena , 2014, 1410.0943.

[36]  D. Struppa,et al.  Superoscillation phenomena in SO(3) , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[37]  Robert W Spekkens,et al.  Negativity and contextuality are equivalent notions of nonclassicality. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[38]  Exact uncertainty relations , 2001, quant-ph/0107149.

[39]  Matthew F Pusey Anomalous weak values are proofs of contextuality. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[40]  D. Struppa,et al.  Quantum harmonic oscillator with superoscillating initial datum , 2014, 1411.4112.

[41]  A. Arie,et al.  Super-narrow frequency conversion , 2015 .

[42]  Jeff Tollaksen,et al.  Novel relationships between superoscillations, weak values, and modular variables , 2007 .

[43]  D. Struppa,et al.  On the Cauchy problem for the Schrödinger equation with superoscillatory initial data , 2013 .

[44]  I. Tamm,et al.  The Uncertainty Relation Between Energy and Time in Non-relativistic Quantum Mechanics , 1991 .

[45]  E. Specker,et al.  The Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics , 1967 .

[46]  Bose-Einstein condensates in a one-dimensional double square well: Analytical solutions of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation , 2002, cond-mat/0206532.

[47]  Perturbation Theory for Singular Potentials in Quantum Mechanics , 1998, cond-mat/9803271.

[48]  M. Berry,et al.  Pointer supershifts and superoscillations in weak measurements , 2012 .

[49]  Irene Marzoli,et al.  Quantum carpets, carpets of light , 2001 .

[50]  Mark R. Dennis,et al.  Natural superoscillations in monochromatic waves in D dimensions , 2009 .

[51]  T. Clark,et al.  High order frequency conversion in the plasma waveguide , 1995, Summaries of papers presented at the Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics.

[52]  P.J.S.G. Ferreira,et al.  Superoscillations: Faster Than the Nyquist Rate , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[53]  D. Struppa,et al.  Superoscillating sequences as solutions of generalized Schrödinger equations , 2015 .