Fast accurate binomial pricing

Abstract. We discuss here an alternative interpretation of the familiar binomial lattice approach to option pricing, illustrating it with reference to pricing of barrier options, one- and two-sided, with fixed, moving or partial barriers, and also the pricing of American put options. It has often been observed that if one tries to price a barrier option using a binomial lattice, then one can find slow convergence to the true price unless care is taken over the placing of the grid points in the lattice; see, for example, the work of Boyle & Lau [2]. The placing of grid points is critical whether one uses a dynamic programming approach, or a Monte Carlo approach, and this can make it difficult to compute hedge ratios, for example. The problems arise from translating a crossing of the barrier for the continuous diffusion process into an event for the binomial approximation. In this article, we show that it is not necessary to make clever choices of the grid positioning, and by interpreting the nature of the binomial approximation appropriately, we are able to derive very quick and accurate pricings of barrier options. The interpretation we give here is applicable much more widely, and helps to smooth out the ‘odd-even’ ripples in the option price as a function of time-to-go which are a common feature of binomial lattice pricing.

[1]  T. Vorst,et al.  Complex Barrier Options , 1996 .

[2]  Mark Broadie,et al.  Connecting discrete and continuous path-dependent options , 1999, Finance Stochastics.

[3]  P. Ritchken On Pricing Barrier Options , 1995 .

[4]  Don M. Chance,et al.  THE PRICING AND HEDGING OF LIMITED EXERCISE CAPS AND SPREADS , 1994 .

[5]  M. Subrahmanyam,et al.  The Valuation of American Barrier Options Using the Decomposition Technique , 1998 .

[6]  P. Carr Two Extensions to Barrier Option Valuation , 1995 .

[7]  F. AitSahlia,et al.  Numerical Methods in Finance: American Options: A Comparison of Numerical Methods , 1997 .

[8]  S. Taylor DIFFUSION PROCESSES AND THEIR SAMPLE PATHS , 1967 .

[9]  Ronald W. Butler,et al.  Saddlepoint Approximations to the CDF of Some Statistics with Nonnormal Limit Distributions , 1993 .

[10]  Don R. Rich The Valuation of Black-Scholes Options Subject to Intertemporal Default Risk , 1999 .

[11]  P. Mandl Analytical treatment of one-dimensional Markov processes , 1968 .

[12]  M. Yor,et al.  PRICING AND HEDGING DOUBLE-BARRIER OPTIONS: A PROBABILISTIC APPROACH , 1996 .

[13]  N. Kunitomo,et al.  Pricing Options With Curved Boundaries , 1992 .

[14]  H. E. Daniels,et al.  Tail Probability Approximations , 1987 .

[15]  S. Ross,et al.  Option pricing: A simplified approach☆ , 1979 .

[16]  Thomas J. Coates,et al.  Crossing the Barriers , 1982 .

[17]  P. Glasserman,et al.  A Continuity Correction for Discrete Barrier Options , 1997 .

[18]  V. V. Petrov Limit Theorems of Probability Theory: Sequences of Independent Random Variables , 1995 .

[19]  Phelim P. Boyle,et al.  Bumping Up Against the Barrier with the Binomial Method , 1994 .

[20]  Dietmar P. J. Leisen The Random-Time Binomial Model , 1999 .

[21]  O. Zane,et al.  Valuing moving barrier options , 1997 .