Cloud characterization and clear-sky correction from Landsat-7

Abstract Landsat, with its wide swath and high resolution, fills an important mesoscale gap between atmospheric variations seen on a few kilometer scale by local surface instrumentation and the global view of coarser resolution satellites such as MODIS. In this important scale range, Landsat reveals radiative effects on the few hundred-meter scale of common photon mean-free-paths, typical of scattering in clouds at conservative (visible) wavelengths, and even shorter mean-free-paths of absorptive (near-infrared) wavelengths. Landsat also reveals shadowing effects caused by both cloud and vegetation that impact both cloudy and clear-sky radiances. As a result, Landsat has been useful in development of new cloud retrieval methods and new aerosol and surface retrievals that account for photon diffusion and shadowing effects. This paper discusses two new cloud retrieval methods: the nonlocal independent pixel approximation (NIPA) and the normalized difference nadir radiance method (NDNR). We illustrate the improvements in cloud property retrieval enabled by the new low gain settings of Landsat-7 and difficulties found at high gains. Then, we review the recently developed “path radiance” method of aerosol retrieval and clear-sky correction using data from the Department of Energy Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) site in Oklahoma. Nearby clouds change the solar radiation incident on the surface and atmosphere due to indirect illumination from cloud sides. As a result, if clouds are nearby, this extra side-illumination causes clear pixels to appear brighter, which can be mistaken for extra aerosol or higher surface albedo. Thus, cloud properties must be known in order to derive accurate aerosol and surface properties. A three-dimensional (3D) Monte Carlo (MC) radiative transfer simulation illustrates this point and suggests a method to subtract the cloud effect from aerosol and surface retrievals. The main conclusion is that cloud, aerosol, and surface retrievals are linked and must be treated as a combined system. Landsat provides the range of scales necessary to observe the 3D cloud radiative effects that influence joint surface-atmospheric retrievals.

[1]  Anthony B. Davis,et al.  Radiative smoothing in fractal clouds , 1995 .

[2]  Robert F. Cahalan,et al.  Independent Pixel and Monte Carlo Estimates of Stratocumulus Albedo , 1994 .

[3]  Robert F. Cahalan,et al.  Liquid water path and plane-parallel albedo bias during ASTEX , 1995 .

[4]  Eric P. Shettle,et al.  Atmospheric Aerosols: Global Climatology and Radiative Characteristics , 1991 .

[5]  Robert F. Cahalan,et al.  Cloud three‐dimensional effects evidenced in Landsat spatial power spectra and autocorrelation functions , 2000 .

[6]  E. Shettle,et al.  Models for the aerosols of the lower atmosphere and the effects of humidity variations on their optical properties , 1979 .

[7]  Robert F. Cahalan.  Bounded cascade clouds: albedo and effective thickness , 1994 .

[8]  H. Barker,et al.  A Parameterization for Computing Grid-Averaged Solar Fluxes for Inhomogeneous Marine Boundary Layer Clouds. Part II: Validation Using Satellite Data , 1996 .

[9]  Boris A. Kargin,et al.  The Monte Carlo Methods in Atmospheric Optics , 1980 .

[10]  G. Batchelor,et al.  An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics , 1968 .

[11]  Robert F. Cahalan,et al.  On the Removal of the Effect of Horizontal Fluxes In Two‐Aircraft Measurements of Cloud Absorption , 1999 .

[12]  C. Bohren,et al.  An introduction to atmospheric radiation , 1981 .

[13]  Robert F. Cahalan,et al.  A New Normalized Difference Cloud Retrieval Technique Applied to Landsat Radiances over the Oklahoma ARM Site , 2000 .

[14]  J. Townshend,et al.  An operational atmospheric correction algorithm for Landsat Thematic Mapper imagery over the land , 1997 .

[15]  Y. Kaufman,et al.  Passive remote sensing of tropospheric aerosol and atmospheric , 1997 .

[16]  J. Hansen,et al.  Light scattering in planetary atmospheres , 1974 .

[17]  Knut Stamnes,et al.  Radiative transfer in stratified atmospheres: Development and verification of a unified model , 1990 .

[18]  Robert F. Cahalan,et al.  The albedo of fractal stratocumulus clouds , 1994 .

[19]  M. King,et al.  Determination of the Optical Thickness and Effective Particle Radius of Clouds from Reflected Solar Radiation Measurements. Part II: Marine Stratocumulus Observations , 1991 .

[20]  K. Stamnes,et al.  Numerically stable algorithm for discrete-ordinate-method radiative transfer in multiple scattering and emitting layered media. , 1988, Applied optics.

[21]  Anthony B. Davis,et al.  Nonlocal independent pixel approximation: direct and inverse problems , 1998, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[22]  Robert F. Cahalan,et al.  Marine stratocumulus structure , 1989 .

[23]  Robert F. Cahalan,et al.  The Landsat Scale Break in Stratocumulus as a Three-Dimensional Radiative Transfer Effect: Implications for Cloud Remote Sensing , 1997 .

[24]  D. Deirmendjian.  Electromagnetic scattering on spherical polydispersions , 1969 .

[25]  Robert F. Cahalan,et al.  Landsat-7 reveals more than just surface features in remote areas of the globe , 2000 .

[26]  Darrel L. Williams,et al.  Enhanced Landsat capturing all the Earth's land areas , 1999 .

[27]  Lorraine Remer,et al.  The MODIS 2.1-μm channel-correlation with visible reflectance for use in remote sensing of aerosol , 1997, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[28]  Robert F. Cahalan,et al.  Path radiance technique for retrieving aerosol optical thickness over land , 1999 .

[29]  Bruce A. Wielicki,et al.  The interpretation of remotely sensed cloud properties from a model paramterization perspective , 1994 .