Intracellular Kinetics of Non-Viral Gene Delivery Using Polyethylenimine Carriers

Purpose Polymeric nucleic acid carriers are designed to overcome one or more barriers to delivery. High molecular weight polyethylenimine (PEI) shows high transfection efficiency but exhibits high cytotoxicity (Fischer et al. Biomaterials, 24:1121–1131 (2003); Peterson et al. Bioconjug. Chem., 13:845–854 (2002)). Nontoxic water-soluble lipopolymer (WSLP) was previously developed using branched poly(ethylenimine) (PEI, mw 1,800) and cholesteryl chloroformate (Han, Mahato, and Kim. Bioconjug. Chem., 12:337–345 (2001)) and is an effective non-viral gene carrier with transfection levels equal or above high molecular weight PEI with a lower cytotoxicity profile. To understand how differences in these polymeric carriers influence transfection, we studied the pharmacokinetics of polymer gene carriers at the cellular level.Materials and MethodsCells were exposed in vitro to different polymeric carriers and the transport of the carriers into different cellular compartments was determined using cellular fractionation and real-time quantitative PCR. A multi-compartment mathematical model was applied to time series measurements of the trafficking of plasmids across each cellular barrier.Results Our result indicates that the chemical modification of WSLP increased the rate parameter for endosomal escape significantly compared to conventional PEI carriers thereby increasing the overall transfection efficiency.ConclusionsThese results are consistent with the goal of endosomal destabilization of the carrier design. This method provides a quantitative means for assessing different polymer construct designs for gene delivery.

[1]  H. O'brodovich,et al.  Metabolic instability of plasmid DNA in the cytosol: a potential barrier to gene transfer , 1999, Gene Therapy.

[2]  R. Mahato,et al.  Intratumoral delivery of p2CMVmIL-12 using water-soluble lipopolymers. , 2001, Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy.

[3]  Stefaan C. De Smedt,et al.  Cationic Polymer Based Gene Delivery Systems , 2000, Pharmaceutical Research.

[4]  D. Scherman,et al.  A versatile vector for gene and oligonucleotide transfer into cells in culture and in vivo: polyethylenimine. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  G. Lukács,et al.  Intracellular routing of plasmid DNA during non-viral gene transfer. , 2005, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[6]  S. W. Kim,et al.  Modified linear polyethylenimine-cholesterol conjugates for DNA complexation. , 2003, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[7]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[8]  D. Taylor,et al.  Hindered diffusion of inert tracer particles in the cytoplasm of mouse 3T3 cells. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  K. Luby-Phelps,et al.  Cytoarchitecture and physical properties of cytoplasm: volume, viscosity, diffusion, intracellular surface area. , 2000, International review of cytology.

[10]  F D Ledley,et al.  Multicompartment, numerical model of cellular events in the pharmacokinetics of gene therapies. , 1994, Human gene therapy.

[11]  A S Verkman,et al.  Size-dependent DNA Mobility in Cytoplasm and Nucleus* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[12]  Thomas Kissel,et al.  In vitro cytotoxicity testing of polycations: influence of polymer structure on cell viability and hemolysis. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[13]  D. Escande,et al.  Polyethylenimine but Not Cationic Lipids Promotes Transgene Delivery to the Nucleus in Mammalian Cells* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[14]  A. Zetterberg,et al.  Existence of a commitment program for mitosis in early G1 in tumour cells , 1995, Cell proliferation.

[15]  Clive J Roberts,et al.  Polyethylenimine-graft-poly(ethylene glycol) copolymers: influence of copolymer block structure on DNA complexation and biological activities as gene delivery system. , 2002, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[16]  Mario R. Capecchi,et al.  High efficiency transformation by direct microinjection of DNA into cultured mammalian cells , 1980, Cell.

[17]  C Russell Middaugh,et al.  Barriers to nonviral gene delivery. , 2003, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[18]  A T Hoogeveen,et al.  Efficacy of a peptide-based gene delivery system depends on mitotic activity. , 1996, Gene therapy.

[19]  S. W. Kim,et al.  Water-soluble lipopolymer for gene delivery. , 2001, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[20]  R J Roselli,et al.  A model for the analysis of nonviral gene therapy , 2003, Gene Therapy.

[21]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Receptor‐mediated targeting of gene delivery vectors: Insights from molecular mechanisms for improved vehicle design , 2000, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[22]  A. Verkman,et al.  Translational Diffusion of Macromolecule-sized Solutes in Cytoplasm and Nucleus , 1997, The Journal of cell biology.

[23]  Virginia Torczon,et al.  On the Convergence of Pattern Search Algorithms , 1997, SIAM J. Optim..

[24]  L G Griffith,et al.  Quantitative comparison of polyethylenimine formulations and adenoviral vectors in terms of intracellular gene delivery processes , 2005, Gene Therapy.