Application of a Sustainability Model for Assessing Water Main Replacement Options

Sustainable development, conceived as a new and multidisciplinary paradigm, is receiving much attention throughout the global community. The purpose of this paper is to apply the sustainability assessment model (SAM), an assessment and decision making methodology, to a water main replacement project in an urban environment to determine the most sustainable project alternative among three possible options. This case study presents the use of SAM in considering various multicriteria sustainability indicators while working towards achieving sustainability enhancement. Objectives of sustainability enhancement include: (1) minimizing environmental impact; (2) maximizing economical benefit and output; (3) social and cultural conservation and promotion; and (4) satisfying basic requirements such as structural soundness and capacity. Six assessment methods including the analytic hierarchy process, cost, pollution, energy, time estimation, and natural resource depletion analysis are used for both qualitative and quantitative sustainability indicators. The weighted sum model is then utilized to integrate the six independent assessment results to elicit the final decision.

[1]  Neil S. Grigg,et al.  Assessment and Renewal of Water Distribution Systems , 2005 .

[2]  Mark Knight,et al.  Excavation of surface installed pipeline , 2001 .

[3]  Kwang-Ho Park,et al.  QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ON LIFE CYCLE OF HIGHWAYS , 2003 .

[4]  Sai On Cheung,et al.  An analytical hierarchy process based procurement selection method , 2001 .

[5]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our common future , 1987 .

[6]  Gerald M. Knapp,et al.  Determining the most important criteria in maintenance decision making , 1997 .

[7]  Judith Gurney.  BP Statistical Review of World Energy , 1985 .

[8]  Barry J. Adams,et al.  Developing sustainability criteria for urban infrastructure systems , 2005 .

[9]  Saeed Mirza,et al.  Durability and sustainability of infrastructure : a state-of-the-art report , 2006 .

[10]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[11]  John Mann,et al.  Stae of the Industry Report 2005: A Guide for Good Health , 2005 .

[12]  Annie R. Pearce,et al.  Sustainable technologies for the building construction industry , 1995 .

[13]  S Tighe,et al.  Trenchless Installations Preserve Pavement Integrity , 2004 .

[14]  Brennan Schumacher Leed Ap,et al.  Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design , 2007 .

[15]  Erez N. Allouche,et al.  Methods for Estimating Pipe Pullback Loads for Horizontal Directional Drilling (HDD) Crossings , 2002 .

[16]  Aviad Shapira,et al.  AHP-Based Equipment Selection Model for Construction Projects , 2005 .

[17]  Jason S. Lueke,et al.  Rehabilitation of underground infrastructure utilizing trenchless pipe replacement , 2001 .

[18]  Edwin K. L. Tam,et al.  Indicators and framework for assessing sustainable infrastructure , 2005 .

[19]  Mohan M. Kumaraswamy,et al.  Sustainability appraisal in infrastructure projects (SUSAIP) , 2005, Automation in Construction.

[20]  Samuel T. Ariaratnam,et al.  Suggested Practices for Installations Using Horizontal Directional Drilling , 2000 .

[21]  Usaid,et al.  Annual statistical bulletin , 1950 .

[22]  Bilal M. Ayyub,et al.  Strategic Implementation of Infrastructure Priority Projects: Case Study in Palestine , 2002 .

[23]  Bruce Tonn,et al.  Integrated 1000-year planning , 2004 .