Understanding the Role of Numeracy in Health: Proposed Theoretical Framework and Practical Insights

Numeracy—that is, how facile people are with mathematical concepts and their applications—is gaining importance in medical decision making and risk communication. This article proposes six critical functions of health numeracy. These functions are integrated into a theoretical framework on health numeracy that has implications for risk communication and medical decision-making processes. The authors examine practical underpinnings for targeted interventions aimed at improving such processes as a function of health numeracy. They hope that the proposed functions and theoretical framework will spur more research to determine how an understanding of health numeracy can lead to more effective communication and decision outcomes.

[1]  Carmen L. Lewis,et al.  A randomized comparison of patients’ understanding of number needed to treat and other common risk reduction formats , 2003, Journal of general internal medicine.

[2]  E. Peters,et al.  THE FUNCTIONS OF AFFECT IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF PREFERENCES ( 2006 , 2008 .

[3]  P. Slovic,et al.  Risk Perception and Affect , 2006 .

[4]  D. Nutbeam.  Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century , 2000 .

[5]  Irwin S. Kirsch,et al.  THE INTERNATIONAL ADULT LITERACY SURVEY (IALS): UNDERSTANDING WHAT WAS MEASURED , 2001 .

[6]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  11. The role of metacognition in social judgment , 2007 .

[7]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Numeracy Skill And The Communication, And Use Of Risk-Benefit Information , 2007 .

[8]  E. J. Carter,et al.  Functional Imaging of Numerical Processing in Adults and 4-y-Old Children , 2006, PLoS biology.

[9]  P. Ubel,et al.  Validation of the Subjective Numeracy Scale: Effects of Low Numeracy on Comprehension of Risk Communications and Utility Elicitations , 2007, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[10]  Arie W. Kruglanski,et al.  Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[11]  Paul K J Han,et al.  Communicating the Uncertainty of Harms and Benefits of Medical Interventions , 2007, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[12]  S. Dehaene,et al.  An open trial assessment of "The Number Race", an adaptive computer game for remediation of dyscalculia , 2006, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[13]  C. K. Mertz,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Numeracy and Decision Making , 2022 .

[14]  Michael Pignone,et al.  Numeracy and the medical student's ability to interpret data. , 2002, Effective clinical practice : ECP.

[15]  V. Reyna,et al.  Fuzzy-trace theory: An interim synthesis , 1995 .

[16]  D. Baker.  The meaning and the measure of health literacy , 2006, Journal of general internal medicine.

[17]  S. Sloman.  The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. , 1996 .

[18]  G. Colditz,et al.  Colon Cancer: Risk Perceptions and Risk Communication , 2004, Journal of health communication.

[19]  G. Fricchione.  Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain , 1995 .

[20]  Jonathan Baron,et al.  The Effect of Numerical Statements of Risk on Trust and Comfort with Hypothetical Physician Risk Communication , 2004, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[21]  Bevan Yueh,et al.  Numeracy and the shortcomings of utility assessment in head and neck cancer patients , 2004, Head & neck.

[22]  Amanda L Golbeck,et al.  A definition and operational framework for health numeracy. , 2005, American journal of preventive medicine.

[23]  Judith H Hibbard,et al.  Consumer Competencies and the Use of Comparative Quality Information , 2007, Medical care research and review : MCRR.

[24]  Ellen Peters,et al.  Numeracy and the Perception and Communication of Risk , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[25]  R. Hamm,et al.  Contingent or Universal Approaches to Patient Deficiencies in Health Numeracy , 2007, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[26]  P. Slovic,et al.  The Use of Narrative Evidence and Explicit Likelihood by Decisionmakers Varying in Numeracy , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[27]  Dianne Davis,et al.  Association of Numeracy and Diabetes Control , 2008, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[28]  C. K. Mertz,et al.  Less Is More in Presenting Quality Information to Consumers , 2007, Medical care research and review : MCRR.

[29]  Cara L Cuite,et al.  A Test of Numeric Formats for Communicating Risk Probabilities , 2008, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[30]  Charles J. Brainerd,et al.  The origins of probability judgment: A review of data and theories. , 1994 .

[31]  E. Marcus.  The silent epidemic--the health effects of illiteracy. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  R. Petty,et al.  The Role of MetaCognition in Social Judgment , 2006 .

[33]  Paul Slovic,et al.  The affect heuristic , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[34]  R F Nease,et al.  Perceptions of breast cancer risk and screening effectiveness in women younger than 50 years of age. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[35]  David A. Kindig,et al.  Health literacy : a prescription to end confusion , 2004 .

[36]  Paul Slovic,et al.  The Construction of Preference: The Construction of Preference: An Overview , 2006 .

[37]  Angela Fagerlin,et al.  Clinical Implications of Numeracy: Theory and Practice , 2008, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[38]  Daniel Västfjäll,et al.  Intuitive Numbers Guide Decisions , 2008, Judgment and Decision Making.

[39]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  The Affect Heuristic and the Attractiveness of Simple Gambles , 2007 .

[40]  D. Nutbeam.  The evolving concept of health literacy. , 2008, Social science & medicine.

[41]  Lisa M. Schwartz,et al.  Assessing Values for Health: Numeracy Matters , 2001, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[42]  Natalie A. Obrecht,et al.  An encounter frequency account of how experience affects likelihood estimation , 2009, Memory & cognition.

[43]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement , 2008, Nature.

[44]  E. Peters,et al.  Dissecting the risky-choice framing effect: Numeracy as an individual-difference factor in weighting risky and riskless options , 2008, Judgment and Decision Making.

[45]  M. Cartwright.  Numeracy needs of the beginning registered nurse. , 1996, Nurse education today.

[46]  Judith H Hibbard,et al.  Supporting informed consumer health care decisions: data presentation approaches that facilitate the use of information in choice. , 2003, Annual review of public health.

[47]  Franziska Marquart,et al.  Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude change , 1988 .

[48]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Heuristics and Biases: Individual Differences in Reasoning: Implications for the Rationality Debate? , 2002 .

[49]  Carlos A Estrada,et al.  Literacy and Numeracy Skills and Anticoagulation Control , 2004, The American journal of the medical sciences.

[50]  Fischhoff,et al.  Verbal and Numerical Expressions of Probability: "It's a Fifty-Fifty Chance" , 2000, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[51]  Charles J. Brainerd,et al.  The importance of mathematics in health and human judgment: Numeracy, risk communication, and medical decision making , 2007 .

[52]  Jessica S Ancker,et al.  Rethinking health numeracy: a multidisciplinary literature review. , 2007, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[53]  B. Rimer,et al.  General Performance on a Numeracy Scale among Highly Educated Samples , 2001, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[54]  V. Reyna,et al.  Chapter 3 Fuzzy Memory and Mathematics in The Classroom , 1993 .

[55]  S. Dehaene,et al.  THREE PARIETAL CIRCUITS FOR NUMBER PROCESSING , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[56]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment , 2002 .

[57]  V. Reyna,et al.  Numeracy, Ratio Bias, and Denominator Neglect in Judgments of Risk and Probability. , 2008 .

[58]  W. T. Tucker,et al.  Strategies for Risk Communication , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[59]  Ellen Peters,et al.  The Construction of Preference: The Functions of Affect in the Construction of Preferences , 2006 .

[60]  C. K. Mertz,et al.  Bringing meaning to numbers: the impact of evaluative categories on decisions. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[61]  V. Reyna,et al.  Fuzzy-trace theory and children's acquisition of mathematical and scientific concepts , 1991 .

[62]  I. Lipkus.  Numeric, Verbal, and Visual Formats of Conveying Health Risks: Suggested Best Practices and Future Recommendations , 2007, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[63]  Lisa M. Schwartz,et al.  The Role of Numeracy in Understanding the Benefit of Screening Mammography , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[64]  M. Schapira,et al.  Agreement Between Scales in the Measurement of Breast Cancer Risk Perceptions , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[65]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics. , 1998 .