A Convex Complementarity Approach for Simulating Large Granular Flows

Aiming at the simulation of dense granular flows, we propose and test a numerical method based on successive convex complementarity problems. This approach originates from a multibody description of the granular flow: all the particles are simulated as rigid bodies with arbitrary shapes and frictional contacts. Unlike the discrete element method (DEM), the proposed approach does not require small integration time steps typical of stiff particle interaction; this fact, together with the development of optimized algorithms that can run also on parallel computing architectures, allows an efficient application of the proposed methodology to granular fiows with a large number of particles. We present an application to the analysis of the refueling flow in pebble-bed nuclear reactors. Extensive validation of our method against both DEM and physical experiments results indicates that essential collective characteristics of dense granular flow are accurately predicted.

[1]  O. Mangasarian Solution of symmetric linear complementarity problems by iterative methods , 1977 .

[2]  P. Cundall,et al.  A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies , 1979 .

[3]  S. Savage,et al.  Gravity flow of cohesionless granular materials in chutes and channels , 1979, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[4]  J. Moreau,et al.  Unilateral Contact and Dry Friction in Finite Freedom Dynamics , 1988 .

[5]  Katta G. Murty,et al.  Linear complementarity, linear and nonlinear programming , 1988 .

[6]  S. Sathiya Keerthi,et al.  A fast procedure for computing the distance between complex objects in three-dimensional space , 1988, IEEE J. Robotics Autom..

[7]  Ahmed A. Shabana,et al.  Dynamics of Multibody Systems , 2020 .

[8]  Dimitri P. Bertsekas,et al.  Nonlinear Programming , 1997 .

[9]  John Rust,et al.  On the Optimal Lifetime of Nuclear Power Plants , 1996 .

[10]  Roux,et al.  Force Distributions in Dense Two-Dimensional Granular Systems. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[11]  D. Stewart,et al.  AN IMPLICIT TIME-STEPPING SCHEME FOR RIGID BODY DYNAMICS WITH INELASTIC COLLISIONS AND COULOMB FRICTION , 1996 .

[12]  M. Anitescu,et al.  Formulating Dynamic Multi-Rigid-Body Contact Problems with Friction as Solvable Linear Complementarity Problems , 1997 .

[13]  D. Stewart Existence of solutions to rigid body dynamics and the Painlevé paradoxes , 1997 .

[14]  D. Stewart Convergence of a Time‐Stepping Scheme for Rigid‐Body Dynamics and Resolution of Painlevé's Problem , 1998 .

[15]  F. Jourdan,et al.  A Gauss-Seidel like algorithm to solve frictional contact problems , 1998 .

[16]  David E. Stewart,et al.  Rigid-Body Dynamics with Friction and Impact , 2000, SIAM Rev..

[17]  D. C. Rapaport,et al.  Granular flow from a silo: Discrete-particle simulations in three dimensions , 2001 .

[18]  Mihai Anitescu,et al.  A fixed-point iteration approach for multibody dynamics with contact and small friction , 2004, Math. Program..

[19]  Mihai Anitescu,et al.  A constraint‐stabilized time‐stepping approach for rigid multibody dynamics with joints, contact and friction , 2004 .

[20]  W. K. Terry,et al.  Advanced Core Design And Fuel Management For Pebble-Bed Reactors , 2004 .

[21]  Andrew C. Kadak,et al.  Pebble Flow Experiments For Pebble Bed Reactors , 2004 .

[22]  M. Bazant,et al.  Velocity profile of granular flows inside silos and hoppers , 2005, cond-mat/0501568.

[23]  David Baraff,et al.  Issues in computing contact forces for non-penetrating rigid bodies , 1993, Algorithmica.

[24]  C. Rycroft,et al.  Analysis of granular flow in a pebble-bed nuclear reactor. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[25]  Mihai Anitescu,et al.  Optimization-based simulation of nonsmooth rigid multibody dynamics , 2006, Math. Program..

[26]  E. Hairer,et al.  Geometric Numerical Integration , 2022, Oberwolfach Reports.

[27]  Ken Kamrin,et al.  Stochastic flow rule for granular materials. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[28]  Martin Z. Bazant,et al.  The stochastic flow rule: a multi-scale model for granular plasticity , 2006, cond-mat/0611391.

[29]  Mihai Anitescu,et al.  A fast contraction mapping for solving multibody systems , 2007 .

[30]  Marek Molenda,et al.  DEM simulation of the packing structure and wall load in a 2-dimensional silo , 2008 .

[31]  Jong-Shi Pang,et al.  Differential variational inequalities , 2008, Math. Program..

[32]  M. Anitescu,et al.  Large-scale parallel multi-body dynamics with frictional contact on the graphical processing unit , 2008 .

[33]  Javier Ortensi,et al.  Analysis of an Earthquake-Initiated-Transient in a PBR , 2009 .

[34]  Richard W. Cottle,et al.  Linear Complementarity Problem , 2009, Encyclopedia of Optimization.

[35]  R. Schmitt,et al.  Powders and Bulk Solids , 2010 .

[36]  W. Y. Yoon,et al.  Next Generation Nuclear Plant Methods Technical Program Plan , 2010 .

[37]  Mihai Anitescu,et al.  An iterative approach for cone complementarity problems for nonsmooth dynamics , 2010, Comput. Optim. Appl..