The neural correlates of beauty comparison.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. How attractive someone is perceived to be depends on the individual or cultural standards to which this person is compared. But although comparisons play a central role in the way people judge the appearance of others, the brain processes underlying attractiveness comparisons remain unknown. In the present experiment, we tested the hypothesis that attractiveness comparisons rely on the same cognitive and neural mechanisms as comparisons of simple nonsocial magnitudes such as size. We recorded brain activity with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while participants compared the beauty or height of two women or two dogs. Our data support the hypothesis of a common process underlying these different types of comparisons. First, we demonstrate that the distance effect characteristic of nonsocial comparisons also holds for attractiveness comparisons. Behavioral results indicated, for all our comparisons, longer response times for near than far distances. Second, the neural correlates of these distance effects overlapped in a frontoparietal network known for its involvement in processing simple nonsocial quantities. These results provide evidence for overlapping processes in the comparison of physical attractiveness and nonsocial magnitudes.

[1]  Klaus Wunderlich,et al.  Neural computations underlying action-based decision making in the human brain , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Robert M. Kaplan,et al.  Is beauty talent? Sex interaction in the attractiveness halo effect , 1978 .

[3]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Neural coding of reward-prediction error signals during classical conditioning with attractive faces. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Transformation of stimulus value signals into motor commands during simple choice , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Stephen M. Rao,et al.  The evolution of brain activation during temporal processing , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  E. Berscheid,et al.  What is beautiful is good. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  G. Orban,et al.  Parietal Representation of Symbolic and Nonsymbolic Magnitude , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics. , 1998 .

[9]  Roi Cohen Kadosh,et al.  Are numbers special? An overview of chronometric, neuroimaging, developmental and comparative studies of magnitude representation , 2008, Progress in Neurobiology.

[10]  K. Dion Cultural perspectives on facial attractiveness. , 2002 .

[11]  M. G. Efran,et al.  The effect of physical appearance on the judgment of guilt, interpersonal attraction, and severity of recommended punishment in a simulated jury task. , 1974 .

[12]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Temporal isolation of neural processes underlying face preference decisions , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Paul J. Whalen,et al.  Are Attractive People Rewarding? Sex Differences in the Neural Substrates of Facial Attractiveness , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  J. Richards,et al.  When Gulliver travels : social context, psychological closeness, and self-appraisals , 1992 .

[15]  J. Donovan,et al.  The effects of sex and sexual orientation on attractiveness judgments: An evolutionary interpretation , 1992 .

[16]  K. Priftis,et al.  Brain damage: Neglect disrupts the mental number line , 2002, Nature.

[17]  D. Singh,et al.  Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: role of waist-to-hip ratio. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  Joan Y. Chiao,et al.  Neural representations of social status hierarchy in human inferior parietal cortex , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The fusiform face area subserves face perception, not generic within-category identification , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  Joseph A Maldjian,et al.  Precentral gyrus discrepancy in electronic versions of the Talairach atlas , 2004, NeuroImage.

[21]  A. Nieder Counting on neurons: the neurobiology of numerical competence , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[22]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Representation of number in the brain. , 2009, Annual review of neuroscience.

[23]  J. Rodin,et al.  Costs, diffusion, and the stigmatized victim. , 1975 .

[24]  C. Senior,et al.  Beauty in the Brain of the Beholder , 2003, Neuron.

[25]  Patrik Vuilleumier,et al.  Emotional modulation of body-selective visual areas. , 2007, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[26]  Christopher J. Fox,et al.  The contribution of the fusiform gyrus and superior temporal sulcus in processing facial attractiveness: Neuropsychological and neuroimaging evidence , 2008, Neuroscience.

[27]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[28]  Hideaki Kawabata,et al.  The Neural Correlates of Desire , 2008, PloS one.

[29]  J. Langlois,et al.  Attractive Faces Are Only Average , 1990 .

[30]  Lori A. Roggman,et al.  What makes a face attractive and why: The role of averageness in defining facial beauty. , 2002 .

[31]  Nicolas Costes,et al.  Task-independent semantic activation for numbers and animals. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[32]  R. Page,et al.  Reinforcement and Helping Behavior1 , 1972 .

[33]  S. Dehaene,et al.  THREE PARIETAL CIRCUITS FOR NUMBER PROCESSING , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[34]  D. LeBihan,et al.  Modulation of Parietal Activation by Semantic Distance in a Number Comparison Task , 2001, NeuroImage.

[35]  Philippe Pinel,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Cerebral Representations of Number, Size, and Luminance during Comparative Judgments , 2004, Neuron.

[36]  James M. Kilner,et al.  Brain systems for assessing facial attractiveness , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[37]  Leslie A. Zebrowitz,et al.  Facial Attractiveness: Evolutionary, Cognitive, and Social Perspectives , 2001 .

[38]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Are numbers special? The comparison systems of the human brain investigated by fMRI , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[39]  D. Perrett,et al.  Symmetry and human facial attractiveness. , 1999 .

[40]  Daniel R. Montello,et al.  Effects of Physical Attractiveness on Affect and Perceptual Judgments: When Social Comparison Overrides Social Reinforcement , 1993 .

[41]  E. Thorndike A constant error in psychological ratings. , 1920 .

[42]  P. Klee,et al.  The Diaries of Paul Klee, 1898-1918 , 1968 .

[43]  Harold Sigall,et al.  Beautiful but dangerous: Effects of offender attractiveness and nature of the crime on juridic judgment. , 1975 .

[44]  J. Langlois,et al.  Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[45]  D. Hamermesh,et al.  Beauty and the Labor Market , 1993 .

[46]  A. Feingold Good-looking people are not what we think. , 1992 .

[47]  Alumit Ishai,et al.  Face Perception Is Modulated by Sexual Preference , 2006, Current Biology.

[48]  Paul J. Laurienti,et al.  An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets , 2003, NeuroImage.

[49]  K. Zilles,et al.  ALE meta-analysis on facial judgments of trustworthiness and attractiveness , 2010, Brain Structure and Function.

[50]  L. Festinger A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[51]  A. Nakamura,et al.  Neuroanatomical correlates of the assessment of facial attractiveness , 1998, Neuroreport.

[52]  David E. J. Linden,et al.  The neural substrates of person comparison—An fMRI study , 2008, NeuroImage.

[53]  A. Tesser,et al.  Popularity in Environmental Context: Facial Feature Assessment of American Movie Actresses , 1999 .

[54]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Response-Selection-Related Parietal Activation during Number Comparison , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[55]  Paul E. Hamburger,et al.  On an automated method , 1966, ACM '66.