Implementation of a Multicenter Biobanking Collaboration for Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Biomarker Discovery Based on Fresh Frozen Pretreatment Tumor Tissue Biopsies.

BACKGROUND The discovery of novel biomarkers that predict treatment response in advanced cancer patients requires acquisition of high-quality tumor samples. As cancer evolves over time, tissue is ideally obtained before the start of each treatment. Preferably, samples are freshly frozen to allow analysis by next-generation DNA/RNA sequencing (NGS) but also for making other emerging systematic techniques such as proteomics and metabolomics possible. Here, we describe the first 469 image-guided biopsies collected in a large collaboration in The Netherlands (Center for Personalized Cancer Treatment) and show the utility of these specimens for NGS analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS Image-guided tumor biopsies were performed in advanced cancer patients. Samples were fresh frozen, vital tumor cellularity was estimated, and DNA was isolated after macrodissection of tumor-rich areas. Safety of the image-guided biopsy procedures was assessed by reporting of serious adverse events within 14 days after the biopsy procedure. RESULTS Biopsy procedures were generally well tolerated. Major complications occurred in 2.1%, most frequently consisting of pain. In 7.3% of the percutaneous lung biopsies, pneumothorax requiring drainage occurred. The majority of samples (81%) contained a vital tumor percentage of at least 30%, from which at least 500 ng DNA could be isolated in 91%. Given our preset criteria, 74% of samples were of sufficient quality for biomarker discovery. The NGS results in this cohort were in line with those in other groups. CONCLUSION Image-guided biopsy procedures for biomarker discovery to enable personalized cancer treatment are safe and feasible and yield a highly valuable biobank. The Oncologist 2017;22:33-40Implications for Practice: This study shows that it is safe to perform image-guided biopsy procedures to obtain fresh frozen tumor samples and that it is feasible to use these biopsies for biomarker discovery purposes in a Dutch multicenter collaboration. From the majority of the samples, sufficient DNA could be yielded to perform next-generation sequencing. These results indicate that the way is paved for consortia to prospectively collect fresh frozen tumor tissue.

[1]  M. Ratain,et al.  Analysis of Impact of Post-Treatment Biopsies in Phase I Clinical Trials. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  S. Sleijfer,et al.  Unsolicited findings of next-generation sequencing for tumor analysis within a Dutch consortium: clinical daily practice reconsidered , 2016, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[3]  E. Winer,et al.  Variation in the Attitudes of Medical Oncologists Toward Research Biopsies in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer. , 2015, The oncologist.

[4]  Ash A. Alizadeh,et al.  Toward understanding and exploiting tumor heterogeneity , 2015, Nature Medicine.

[5]  D. Adams,et al.  Intra- and inter-tumor heterogeneity in a vemurafenib-resistant melanoma patient and derived xenografts , 2015, EMBO molecular medicine.

[6]  Ryan Hendricks,et al.  The landscape of precision cancer medicine clinical trials in the United States. , 2015, Cancer treatment reviews.

[7]  E. Cuppen,et al.  Detailed imaging and genetic analysis reveal a secondary BRAFL505H resistance mutation and extensive intrapatient heterogeneity in metastatic BRAF mutant melanoma patients treated with vemurafenib , 2015, Pigment cell & melanoma research.

[8]  N. McGranahan,et al.  Biological and therapeutic impact of intratumor heterogeneity in cancer evolution. , 2015, Cancer cell.

[9]  M. Hatt,et al.  18F-FDG PET Uptake Characterization Through Texture Analysis: Investigating the Complementary Nature of Heterogeneity and Functional Tumor Volume in a Multi–Cancer Site Patient Cohort , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[10]  J. Wolchok,et al.  Genetic basis for clinical response to CTLA-4 blockade in melanoma. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  Charles Laymon,et al.  Quantifying Metabolic Heterogeneity in Head and Neck Tumors in Real Time: 2-DG Uptake Is Highest in Hypoxic Tumor Regions , 2014, PloS one.

[12]  Anne-Mette K. Hein,et al.  Next-Generation Sequencing of RNA and DNA Isolated from Paired Fresh-Frozen and Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Samples of Human Cancer and Normal Tissue , 2014, PloS one.

[13]  Benjamin Haibe-Kains,et al.  Inconsistency in large pharmacogenomic studies , 2013, Nature.

[14]  Benjamin J. Raphael,et al.  Mutational landscape and significance across 12 major cancer types , 2013, Nature.

[15]  Mauricio O. Carneiro,et al.  From FastQ Data to High‐Confidence Variant Calls: The Genome Analysis Toolkit Best Practices Pipeline , 2013, Current protocols in bioinformatics.

[16]  E. Boerwinkle,et al.  dbNSFP v2.0: A Database of Human Non‐synonymous SNVs and Their Functional Predictions and Annotations , 2013, Human mutation.

[17]  S. Pradervand,et al.  Identification of Multiple Mechanisms of Resistance to Vemurafenib in a Patient with BRAFV600E-Mutated Cutaneous Melanoma Successfully Rechallenged after Progression , 2013, Clinical Cancer Research.

[18]  E. Kohn,et al.  Feasibility and safety of sequential research‐related tumor core biopsies in clinical trials , 2013, Cancer.

[19]  Vincent Ferretti,et al.  Feasibility of real time next generation sequencing of cancer genes linked to drug response: Results from a clinical trial , 2013, International journal of cancer.

[20]  J. Kimmelman,et al.  Publication and Reporting Conduct for Pharmacodynamic Analyses of Tumor Tissue in Early-Phase Oncology Trials , 2012, Clinical Cancer Research.

[21]  Gabor T. Marth,et al.  Haplotype-based variant detection from short-read sequencing , 2012, 1207.3907.

[22]  Wendy S. W. Wong,et al.  Strelka: accurate somatic small-variant calling from sequenced tumor-normal sample pairs , 2012, Bioinform..

[23]  T. de Baère,et al.  Sequential research-related biopsies in phase I trials: acceptance, feasibility and safety. , 2012, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[24]  Pablo Cingolani,et al.  © 2012 Landes Bioscience. Do not distribute. , 2022 .

[25]  P. A. Futreal,et al.  Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  Christopher A. Miller,et al.  VarScan 2: somatic mutation and copy number alteration discovery in cancer by exome sequencing. , 2012, Genome research.

[27]  P. V. van Diest,et al.  Primary Colorectal Cancers and Their Subsequent Hepatic Metastases Are Genetically Different: Implications for Selection of Patients for Targeted Treatment , 2011, Clinical Cancer Research.

[28]  E. Cuppen,et al.  Multiplexed array-based and in-solution genomic enrichment for flexible and cost-effective targeted next-generation sequencing , 2011, Nature Protocols.

[29]  M. Hicks,et al.  Outcomes of research biopsies in phase I clinical trials: the MD anderson cancer center experience. , 2011, The oncologist.

[30]  Lorenza Mittempergher,et al.  Gene Expression Profiles from Formalin Fixed Paraffin Embedded Breast Cancer Tissue Are Largely Comparable to Fresh Frozen Matched Tissue , 2011, PloS one.

[31]  M. DePristo,et al.  The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. , 2010, Genome research.

[32]  K. Flaherty,et al.  Inhibition of mutated, activated BRAF in metastatic melanoma. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[33]  J. Charboneau,et al.  Incidence of bleeding after 15,181 percutaneous biopsies and the role of aspirin. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[34]  Richard Durbin,et al.  Sequence analysis Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows – Wheeler transform , 2009 .

[35]  L. Schwartz,et al.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[36]  M. Picchio,et al.  Intratumoral Spatial Distribution of Hypoxia and Angiogenesis Assessed by 18F-FAZA and 125I-Gluco-RGD Autoradiography , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[37]  A. McGuire,et al.  Research ethics and the challenge of whole-genome sequencing , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[38]  A. Giorgio,et al.  Complications After Interventional Sonography of Focal Liver Lesions , 2003, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[39]  J. Haaga,et al.  Sequential tumor biopsies in early phase clinical trials of anticancer agents for pharmacodynamic evaluation. , 2001, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.