Sustainability multivariate analysis based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) framework, using as a case study: Brazil compared to Spain and Portugal

The main objective of this research is to find the sustainability gradients of Brazilian companies and sort them as a function of economic, environmental and social components, using multivariate meth- ods for dichotomous data, in order to establish the foundations for better knowledge of the trends and sustainability reporting habits of Brazil. The methodology used is a combined approach, comprising Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) and Logistic Regression Model (LRM) to build an External Logistics Biplot (ELB). We found that the most sustainable companies are associated with great con- cern for biodiversity, conservation and air pollution prevention, as well as with the strong relationship with employees, human rights promotion and fighting against child labour and forced labour. We con- clude that it is possible to obtain sustainability gradients not only for Brazil but also for any country that uses the GRI framework, applying the ELB.

[1]  Dr. Md. Rouf.  The Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: A Study of Listed Companies in Bangladesh , 2015 .

[2]  Eric Vaz,et al.  How Corporations Deal with Reporting Sustainability: Assessment Using the Multicriteria Logistic Biplot Approach , 2015, Syst..

[3]  Michael J. Pisani,et al.  CSR, Sustainability and the Meaning of Global Reporting for Latin American Corporations , 2010 .

[4]  José L. Vicente-Villardón,et al.  Identifying molecular markers associated with classification of genotypes by External Logistic Biplots , 2008, Bioinform..

[5]  L. L. Rodrigues,et al.  Factors Influencing Social Responsibility Disclosure by Portuguese Companies , 2008 .

[6]  L. Ho,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of Triple Bottom-Line Reporting and its Determinants: Evidence from the United States and Japan , 2007 .

[7]  J. Andrew,et al.  Corporate Social and Environmental Disclosure in Developing Countries: Evidence from Bangladesh , 2006 .

[8]  Subramanian Rangan,et al.  EXPLAINING OUTCOMES IN COMPETITION AMONG FOREIGN MULTINATIONALS IN A FOCAL HOST MARKET , 2004 .

[9]  David Power,et al.  Social and Environmental Disclosure and Corporate Characteristics: A Research Note and Extension , 2001 .

[10]  Nebel Bernard,et al.  Ciencias ambientales: ecología y desarrollo sostenible , 1999 .

[11]  C. Adams,et al.  CORPORATE SOCIAL REPORTING PRACTICES IN WESTERN EUROPE: LEGITIMATING CORPORATE BEHAVIOUR?☆☆☆ , 1998 .

[12]  G. Azzone,et al.  Evolutionary trends in environmental reporting , 1996 .

[13]  C. Inclan,et al.  Corporate environmental disclosures: Competitive disclosure hypothesis using 1991 annual report data , 1996 .

[14]  Dennis M. Patten.  Exposure, legitimacy, and social disclosure , 1991 .

[15]  Terence Cooke.  Voluntary Corporate Disclosure by Swedish Companies , 1989 .

[16]  A. Belkaoui,et al.  Determinants of the Corporate Decision to Disclose Social Information , 1989 .

[17]  S. Gray.  Towards a Theory of Cultural Influence on the Development of Accounting Systems Internationally , 1988 .

[18]  Lee D. Parker,et al.  The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: A typology and frequency-based analysis , 1987 .

[19]  S. Al-Athel,et al.  Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: "Our Common Future" , 1987 .

[20]  Ken T. Trotman,et al.  Associations between social responsibility disclosure and characteristics of companies , 1981 .