Orientation is different: Interaction between contour integration and feature contrasts in visual search.

Salient items usually capture attention and are beneficial to visual search. Jingling and Tseng (2013), nevertheless, have discovered that a salient collinear column can impair local visual search. The display used in that study had 21 rows and 27 columns of bars, all uniformly horizontal (or vertical) except for one column of bars orthogonally oriented to all other bars, making this unique column of collinear (or noncollinear) bars salient in the display. Observers discriminated an oblique target bar superimposed on one of the bars either in the salient column or in the background. Interestingly, responses were slower for a target in a salient collinear column than in the background. This opens a theoretical question of how contour integration interacts with salience computation, which is addressed here by an examination of how salience modulated the search impairment from the collinear column. We show that the collinear column needs to have a high orientation contrast with its neighbors to exert search interference. A collinear column of high contrast in color or luminance did not produce the same impairment. Our results show that orientation-defined salience interacted with collinear contour differently from other feature dimensions, which is consistent with the neuronal properties in V1.

[1]  S. Dakin,et al.  Context influences contour integration. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[2]  G W Humphreys,et al.  Interactions between perceptual organization based on Gestalt laws and those based on hierarchical processing , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  R. Rauschenberger.  Attentional capture by auto- and allo-cues , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  Giovanni Galfano,et al.  Color, form and luminance capture attention in visual search , 2000, Vision Research.

[5]  Pi-Chun Huang,et al.  Pattern masking: the importance of remote spatial frequencies and their phase alignment. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[6]  Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 4.0: Current Progress With a Model of Visual Search , 2007, Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems.

[7]  Dov Sagi,et al.  How do flankers' relations affect crowding? , 2010, Journal of vision.

[8]  Zhaoping Li.  A saliency map in primary visual cortex , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  D. Navon.  Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  C. Tseng,et al.  Collinearity impairs local element visual search. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  M. Morgan,et al.  The Relationship between Search Efficiency and Crowding , 2007, Perception.

[12]  R. Hess,et al.  Ladder contours are undetectable in the periphery: a crowding effect? , 2007, Journal of vision.

[13]  Zhaoping Li.  V1 mechanisms and some figure-ground and border effects. , 2003, Journal of physiology, Paris.

[14]  Li Jingling,et al.  Change Detection is Easier at Texture Border Bars When They are Parallel to the Border: Evidence for V1 Mechanisms of Bottom-up Salience , 2008, Perception.

[15]  M. Turatto,et al.  Attentional capture by color without any relevant attentional set , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  J. Theeuwes.  Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[18]  D. Navon.  What does a compound letter tell the psychologist's mind? , 2003, Acta psychologica.

[19]  Ariella V. Popple.  Context effects on texture border localization bias , 2003, Vision Research.

[20]  G. Westheimer,et al.  Global stimulus configuration modulates crowding. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[21]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[23]  R. Rosenholtz,et al.  A summary statistic representation in peripheral vision explains visual search. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[24]  Frank E. Ritter,et al.  The Rise of Cognitive Architectures , 2007, Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems.

[25]  Giovanni Galfano,et al.  Stimulus-Driven Attentional Capture: An Empirical Comparison of Display-Size and Distance Methods , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[26]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[27]  Eds L. Itti,et al.  The primary visual cortex creates a bottom-up saliency map , 2005 .

[28]  C. Koch,et al.  Computational modelling of visual attention , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[29]  Dov Sagi,et al.  Configuration influence on crowding. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[30]  R. F Hess,et al.  Contour integration and cortical processing , 2003, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[31]  H. Nothdurft.  Feature analysis and the role of similarity in preattentive vision , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[32]  J. Theeuwes.  Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[33]  D. Levi,et al.  Visual crowding: a fundamental limit on conscious perception and object recognition , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[34]  Nathalie Guyader,et al.  Interference with Bottom-Up Feature Detection by Higher-Level Object Recognition , 2007, Current Biology.

[35]  S. Yantis,et al.  Visual motion and attentional capture , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[36]  H. Nothdurft.  Salience from feature contrast: variations with texture density , 2000, Vision Research.

[37]  Sieu K. Khuu,et al.  Configuration specificity of crowding in peripheral vision , 2011, Vision Research.

[38]  M. Landy,et al.  Discrimination of orientation-defined texture edges , 1995, Vision Research.

[39]  C. Tseng,et al.  Salient collinear grouping diminishes local salience in visual search: an eye movement study. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[40]  J. Driver,et al.  Segmentation, attention and phenomenal visual objects , 2001, Cognition.

[41]  S. Yantis.  Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  D. Pelli,et al.  The same binding in contour integration and crowding. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[43]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Contour Saliency in Primary Visual Cortex , 2006, Neuron.

[44]  H. Nothdurft.  Salience from feature contrast: additivity across dimensions , 2000, Vision Research.

[45]  Steven Yantis,et al.  Visual interactions in the path of apparent motion , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.