A New Deterministic Approach Using Sensitivity Region Measures for Multi-Objective Robust and Feasibility Robust Design Optimization

We present a deterministic non-gradient based approach that uses robustness measures in multi-objective optimization problems where uncontrollable parameter variations cause variation in the objective and constraint values. The approach is applicable for cases that have discontinuous objective and constraint functions with respect to uncontrollable parameters, and can be used for objective or feasibility robust optimization, or both together. In our approach, the known parameter tolerance region maps into sensitivity regions in the objective and constraint spaces. The robustness measures are indices calculated, using an optimizer, from the sizes of the acceptable objective and constraint variation regions and from worst-case estimates of the sensitivity regions'sizes, resulting in an outer-inner structure. Two examples provide comparisons of the new approach with a similar published approach that is applicable only with continuous junctions. Both approaches work well with continuous functions. For discontinuous functions the new approach gives solutions near the nominal Pareto front; the earlier approach does not.

[1]  R. A. Gellatly,et al.  Optimal Structural Design. , 1971 .

[2]  Genichi Taguchi,et al.  Performance analysis design , 1978 .

[3]  Richard J. Balling,et al.  Consideration of Worst-Case Manufacturing Tolerances in Design Optimization , 1986 .

[4]  K. Ishii,et al.  Design optimization for robustness using performance simulation programs , 1992 .

[5]  Carl D. Sorensen,et al.  A general approach for robust optimal design , 1993 .

[6]  Alan R. Parkinson,et al.  Robust Optimal Design for Worst-Case Tolerances , 1994 .

[7]  Donald R. Houser,et al.  A ROBUST OPTIMIZATION PROCEDURE WITH VARIATIONS ON DESIGN VARIABLES AND CONSTRAINTS , 1995 .

[8]  Jian Su,et al.  Automatic Differentiation in Robust Optimization , 1997 .

[9]  Kaisa Miettinen,et al.  Nonlinear multiobjective optimization , 1998, International series in operations research and management science.

[10]  Jyh-Cheng Yu,et al.  Design for Robustness Based on Manufacturing Variation Patterns , 1998 .

[11]  Wei Chen,et al.  Quality utility : a Compromise Programming approach to robust design , 1999 .

[12]  Kyung K. Choi,et al.  A NEW STUDY ON RELIABILITY-BASED DESIGN OPTIMIZATION , 1999 .

[13]  Wei Chen,et al.  Towards a Better Understanding of Modeling Feasibility Robustness in Engineering Design , 2000 .

[14]  Ivo F. Sbalzariniy,et al.  Multiobjective optimization using evolutionary algorithms , 2000 .

[15]  Jianmin Zhu,et al.  Performance Distribution Analysis and Robust Design , 2001 .

[16]  Young H. Park,et al.  Extensions of design potential concept for reliability-based design optimization to nonsmooth and extreme cases , 2001 .

[17]  Kwon-Hee Lee,et al.  Robust optimization considering tolerances of design variables , 2001 .

[18]  Shapour Azarm,et al.  Constraint handling improvements for multiobjective genetic algorithms , 2002 .

[19]  Byung Chai Lee,et al.  Development of a simple and efficient method for robust optimization , 2002 .

[20]  A. Ismail-Yahaya,et al.  Multiobjective robust design using physical programming , 2002 .

[21]  Kyung K. Choi,et al.  Hybrid Analysis Method for Reliability-Based Design Optimization , 2003 .

[22]  Subroto Gunawan,et al.  Parameter Sensitivity Measures for Single Objective, Multi-Objective, and Feasibility Robust Design Optimization , 2004 .

[23]  Shapour Azarm,et al.  On a Combined Multi-Objective and Feasibility Robustness Method for Design Optimization , 2004 .

[24]  S. Azarm,et al.  Multi-objective robust optimization using a sensitivity region concept , 2005 .

[25]  Shapour Azarm,et al.  A Feasibility Robust Optimization Method Using Sensitivity Region Concept , 2005 .