BOUND FEATURES , MERGE , AND TRANSITIVITY ALTERNATIONS

ing away from the conflation process itself, the argument structure of calve of (1a) is as follows:3

[1]  Sarah M. B. Fagan.  The English Middle , 1988 .

[2]  K. Hale.  Subject Obviation, Switch Reference, and Control , 1992 .

[3]  T. R. Rapoport,et al.  The English Middle and Agentivity , 1999, Linguistic Inquiry.

[4]  K. Hale,et al.  Linguistic Inquiry 27:1–68 (Winter 1996) THE STRUCTURAL DETERMINATION OF CASE AND AGREEMENT , 2022 .

[5]  S. J. Keyser,et al.  On the middle and ergative constructions in English , 1984 .

[6]  P. Ackema,et al.  Middles and nonmovement , 1995 .

[7]  暁夫 小川.  Sarah M. B. FAGAN: The Syntax and Semantics of Middle Constructions , 1993 .

[8]  S. Kemmer.  The Middle Voice , 1993 .

[9]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Minimalist Program , 1992 .

[10]  P. Ridder.  [Incorporation]. , 2018, Zeitschrift fur klinische Psychologie, Psychopathologie und Psychotherapie.

[11]  Maria Bittner,et al.  Case, scope, and binding , 1993 .

[12]  Teun Hoekstra,et al.  Small clause results , 1988 .

[13]  Lisa deMena Travis,et al.  Parameters and effects of word order variation , 1984 .

[14]  Ken Hale,et al.  THE BASIC ELEMENTS OF ARGUMENT STRUCTURE , 1998 .

[15]  Judith Aissen.  On the syntax of obviation , 1997 .

[16]  Ken Hale,et al.  On Argument Structure and the Lexical Expression of Syntactic Relations , 1993 .

[17]  Ken Hale,et al.  Ergativity: toward a theory of a heterogeneous class: toward a theory of a heterogeneous class , 1996 .

[18]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Minimalist inquiries : the framework , 1998 .

[19]  Heidi Harley.  Papers from the UPenn/MIT roundtable on argument structure and aspect , 1998 .