Context effect on query formulation and subjective relevance in health searches

It is recognized by the Information Retrieval community that context aects the retrieval process. Query formulation and relevance assessment are stages where the user role is central. The first determines what the system will search for and the second is frequently used to evaluate how the system behaved. With a large human involvement, these stages are expected to be largely influenced by user and task characteristics. To analyze the influence of these context features on the specified stages of health information retrieval, we conducted a user study in which we collected user features through two questionnaires. User characteristics include features like age, gender, web search experience, health search experience and familiarity with the medical topic. Task features include the medical specialty, the question type, the task's clarity and the task's easiness. Besides user and task features, the relevance assessment analysis also covered features related to the query and document. We found many variables do indeed aect query formulation and relevance judgment. Some of our results question evaluations using test collections and ask for evaluation models that incorporate other kind of success measures.

[1]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  The Turn - Integration of Information Seeking and Retrieval in Context , 2005, The Kluwer International Series on Information Retrieval.

[2]  Michael B. Eisenberg,et al.  A re-examination of relevance: toward a dynamic, situational definition , 1990, Inf. Process. Manag..

[3]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Towards a Better Understanding of Context and Context-Awareness , 1999, HUC.

[4]  Linda Schamber Relevance and Information Behavior. , 1994 .

[5]  Ralf Bierig,et al.  Time, location and interest: an empirical and user-centred study , 2006, IIiX.

[6]  Pia Borlund,et al.  The IIR evaluation model: a framework for evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems , 2003, Inf. Res..

[7]  Jimmy Lin,et al.  Representation of Information Needs and the Elements of Context: A Case Study in the Domain of Clinical Medicine , 2005 .

[8]  T. Saracevic,et al.  Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part II: nature and manifestations of relevance , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[9]  Carla Teixeira Lopes Context features and their use in information retrieval , 2009 .

[10]  Tefko Saracevic Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part III: Behavior and effects of relevance , 2007 .

[11]  Carol L. Barry User-defined relevance criteria: an exploratory study , 1994 .

[12]  Tefko Saracevic,et al.  RELEVANCE: A review of and a framework for the thinking on the notion in information science , 1997, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[13]  Paul Dourish,et al.  What we talk about when we talk about context , 2004, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[14]  Pia Borlund,et al.  The concept of relevance in IR , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[15]  Diane Kelly,et al.  Contextual relevance feedback , 2006, IIiX.

[16]  Bernard J. Jansen,et al.  A review of web searching studies and a framework for future research , 2001 .

[17]  R. J. Cline,et al.  Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: the state of the art. , 2001, Health education research.

[18]  Anne Aula,et al.  Query Formulation in Web Information Search , 2003, ICWI.