Work‐life policy: does it do exactly what it says on the tin?

Policies which help employees balance their work and non‐work priorities have become increasingly popular among UK employers in recent years. Along with a legislative imperative for family leave‐related policies, employers are being encouraged to introduce work‐life policies and make them more inclusive in order to enhance their business performance. This paper looks at how four financial services organisations have approached the work‐life balance agenda and examines the fit between the organisational intentions for work‐life policy and actual outcomes for both organisations and employees. Culture played a large part in determining the experience of policies but so did resources. What managers were being asked to achieve in the business was often incompatible with formal work‐life policies. Despite the rhetoric, work‐life balance was still viewed as a tool for, and was used by female parents, limiting its potential to achieve the promoted business benefits.

[1]  Shirley Dex,et al.  Flexible and Family‐Friendly Working Arrangements in UK‐Based SMEs: Business Cases , 2001 .

[2]  I. Thaulow,et al.  Formal and Informal Flexibility in the Workplace , 1996 .

[3]  Suzan Lewis,et al.  `Family Friendly' Employment Policies: A Route to Changing Organizational Culture or Playing About at the Margins? , 1997 .

[4]  H. Metcalf,et al.  Employers' Use of Flexible Labour , 1997 .

[5]  J. Summers,et al.  Family-Friendly Working?: Putting Policy into Practice , 2002 .

[6]  D. Perrons Flexible Working and Equal Opportunities in the United Kingdom: A Case Study from Retail , 2000 .

[7]  R. Crompton,et al.  Employment and Caring in British and Norwegian Banking: An Exploration through Individual Careers , 2000 .

[8]  Suzan Lewis,et al.  Developing and Implementing Policies: Midland Bank's Experience , 1996 .

[9]  Shirley Dex,et al.  Business Performance and Family-Friendly Policies , 1999 .

[10]  S. Lewis Restructuring workplace cultures: the ultimate work‐family challenge? , 2001 .

[11]  R. Crompton,et al.  Explaining women's employment patterns: 'orientations to work' revisited. , 1998, The British journal of sociology.

[12]  S. Dex,et al.  The nature and pattern of family-friendly employment policies in Britain , 2002 .

[13]  Laura L. Beauvais,et al.  When Work–Family Benefits Are Not Enough: The Influence of Work–Family Culture on Benefit Utilization, Organizational Attachment, and Work–Family Conflict☆☆☆★ , 1999 .

[14]  S. Arber,et al.  Feminist fallacies: a reply to Hakim on women's employment. , 1996, The British journal of sociology.

[15]  C. Hakim,et al.  Five feminist myths about women's employment. , 1995, The British journal of sociology.

[16]  Shirley Dex,et al.  Should we have more family-friendly policies? , 1998 .

[17]  Natasha Susan Mauthner,et al.  `Family Friendly' Policies and Practices in the Oil and Gas Industry: Employers' Perspectives , 2000 .

[18]  S. Dex,et al.  SMEs and flexible working arrangements , 2002 .

[19]  S. Dex,et al.  Findings: The Nature and Patterns of Family - Friendly Employment Policies in Britain , 2002 .