Benchmarking Optimisation Methods for Model Selection and Parameter Estimation of Nonlinear Systems

Characterisation and quantification of nonlinearities in the engineering structures include selecting and fitting a good mathematical model to a set of experimental vibration data with significant nonlinear features. These tasks involve solving an optimisation problem where it is difficult to choose a priori the best optimisation technique. This paper presents a systematic comparison of ten optimisation methods used to select the best nonlinear model and estimate its parameters through nonlinear system identification. The model selection framework fits the structure’s equation of motions using time-domain dynamic response data and takes into account couplings due to the presence of the nonlinearities. Three benchmark problems are used to evaluate the performance of two families of optimisation methods: (i) deterministic local searches and (ii) global optimisation metaheuristics. Furthermore, hybrid local–global optimisation methods are examined. All benchmark problems include a free play nonlinearity commonly found in mechanical structures. Multiple performance criteria are considered based on computational efficiency and robustness, that is, finding the best nonlinear model. Results show that hybrid methods, that is, the multi-start strategy with local gradient-based Levenberg–Marquardt method and the particle swarm with Levenberg–Marquardt method, lead to a successful selection of nonlinear models and an accurate estimation of their parameters within acceptable computational times.

[1]  Jae-Sung Bae,et al.  Effects of structural nonlinearity on subsonic aeroelastic characteristics of an aircraft wing with control surface , 2004 .

[2]  Jakob Søndergaard Jensen,et al.  Optimization of hardening/softening behavior of plane frame structures using nonlinear normal modes , 2016 .

[3]  A R Champneys,et al.  Analysis of piecewise linear aeroelastic systems using numerical continuation , 2002 .

[4]  Jean-Philippe Noël,et al.  Nonlinear system identification in structural dynamics: 10 more years of progress , 2017 .

[5]  Adam P. Piotrowski,et al.  Population size in Particle Swarm Optimization , 2020, Swarm Evol. Comput..

[6]  P. Guillaume,et al.  The PolyMAX Frequency-Domain Method: A New Standard for Modal Parameter Estimation? , 2004 .

[7]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[8]  Julio R. Banga,et al.  Benchmarking optimization methods for parameter estimation in large kinetic models , 2018, bioRxiv.

[9]  Gaëtan Kerschen,et al.  THEORETICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL IDENTIFICATION OF A NON-LINEAR BEAM , 2001 .

[10]  Haitao Liao An approach to construct the relationship between the nonlinear normal mode and forced response of nonlinear systems , 2016 .

[11]  A. Vakakis,et al.  Time-series-based nonlinear system identification of strongly nonlinear attachments , 2019, Journal of Sound and Vibration.

[12]  Mehmet Kurt,et al.  Nonlinear system identification of the dynamics of a vibro-impact beam: numerical results , 2012 .

[13]  K. Moore Characteristic nonlinear system identification: A data-driven approach for local nonlinear attachments , 2019, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing.

[14]  Sina Safari,et al.  Nonlinear Function Selection and Parameter Estimation of Structures with Localised Nonlinearities, Part 1: Numerical Analysis , 2021 .

[15]  Shyamal Guchhait,et al.  Particle swarm optimization–based characterization technique of nonproportional viscous damping parameter of a cantilever beam , 2021, Journal of Vibration and Control.

[16]  Christoph W. Schwingshackl,et al.  Comparison of Nonlinear System Identification Methods for Free Decay Measurements with Application to MEMS Devices , 2017 .

[17]  Gaëtan Kerschen,et al.  Numerical computation of nonlinear normal modes in a modal derivative subspace , 2018 .

[18]  David J. Wagg,et al.  Model selection and parameter estimation in structural dynamics using approximate Bayesian computation , 2018 .

[19]  Jonathan E. Cooper,et al.  NORMAL-MODE FORCE APPROPRIATION—THEORY AND APPLICATION , 1999 .

[20]  A. Vakakis,et al.  Direct detection of nonlinear modal interactions from time series measurements , 2017, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing.

[21]  A. Rama Mohan Rao,et al.  Nonlinear identification of structures using ambient vibration data , 2015 .

[22]  Ángel Corberán,et al.  Scatter search , 2003 .

[23]  Maren Scheel,et al.  Numerical Assessment of Polynomial Nonlinear State-Space and Nonlinear-Mode Models for Near-Resonant Vibrations , 2020 .

[24]  K. Tiels,et al.  Polynomial nonlinear state space identification of an aero-engine structure , 2020 .

[25]  H. N. Özgüven,et al.  Experimental Identification of Backbone Curves of Strongly Nonlinear Systems by Using Response-Controlled Stepped-Sine Testing (RCT) , 2020, Vibration.

[26]  Riccardo Poli,et al.  Particle swarm optimization , 1995, Swarm Intelligence.

[27]  J N Kutz,et al.  Model selection for dynamical systems via sparse regression and information criteria , 2017, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[28]  Jonathan E. Cooper,et al.  Identification of systems containing nonlinear stiffnesses using backbone curves , 2017 .

[29]  Sina Safari,et al.  Direct optimisation based model selection and parameter estimation using time-domain data for identifying localised nonlinearities , 2021, Journal of Sound and Vibration.

[30]  Alexander F. Vakakis,et al.  Methodology for nonlinear quantification of a flexible beam with a local, strong nonlinearity , 2017 .

[31]  Luigi Garibaldi,et al.  A time domain approach for identifying nonlinear vibrating structures by subspace methods , 2008 .

[32]  Jean-Philippe Noël,et al.  Subspace-based identification of a nonlinear spacecraft in the time and frequency domains , 2014 .

[33]  Keith Worden,et al.  On evolutionary system identification with applications to nonlinear benchmarks , 2018, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing.

[34]  Jan Swevers,et al.  Identification of nonlinear systems using Polynomial Nonlinear State Space models , 2010, Autom..

[35]  Jonathan E. Cooper,et al.  Identification of backbone curves of nonlinear systems from resonance decay responses , 2015 .

[36]  M. Friswell,et al.  An Optimization-Based Framework for Nonlinear Model Selection and Identification , 2019, Vibration.

[37]  T. Dossogne,et al.  Nonlinear dynamic model upgrading and updating using sine-sweep vibration data , 2019, Proceedings of the Royal Society A.