Electronic Patient Reported Outcome (ePRO) Measures in Patients with Soft Tissue Sarcoma (STS) Receiving Palliative Treatment

Simple Summary Therapeutic options for advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) are limited. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL), along with traditional outcome parameters such as tumor control and toxicity, is one of the most important endpoints for palliative STS treatment. The PazoQoL prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study (EudraCT number 2017-003382-10, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT0373575) was designed to assess the impact of treatment on HRQoL and patient-reported outcomes. Although the study had to be terminated early due to the pandemic, some valuable results were collected on the continuous recording of symptoms over a 9-week period and on patient satisfaction with therapy. Our findings could be translated into clinical practice without much effort and outside of a trial. Abstract The PazoQoL prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study was designed to continuously assess global health related quality of life (HRQoL) during treatment with pazopanib or physician-preferred chemotherapy over a 9-week period. The questionnaires were completed by the patients at home with great reliability during this time period. Continuous electronic patient reported outcome (ePRO) enabled early detection of the onset of deterioration and timely initiation of countermeasures. The Cancer Therapy Satisfaction Questionnaire (CTSQ) showed high interindividual variability and decline over a 9-week period, whereas the Time Trade-off (TTO) proved to be an efficient method for assessing individual benefit from cancer therapy. In our cohort, the TTO clearly demonstrated that the prolongation of life and the side effect profile of continued therapy were not as satisfactory as expected by patients when starting a new therapy. Although the study had to be stopped early due to the pandemic, our findings could translate into clinical practice without much effort and outside of a trial.

[1]  P. Bower,et al.  Routine provision of feedback from patient-reported outcome measurements to healthcare providers and patients in clinical practice. , 2021, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[2]  N. Taira,et al.  Randomized Controlled Trial of Paper-Based at a Hospital versus Continual Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes at Home for Metastatic Cancer Patients: Does Electronic Measurement at Home Detect Patients’ Health Status in Greater Detail? , 2021, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[3]  G. Collins,et al.  Patient-Reported Outcomes as Independent Prognostic Factors for Survival in Oncology: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. , 2021, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[4]  M. Conner,et al.  Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial of eRAPID: eHealth Intervention During Chemotherapy. , 2021, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  J. Martín-Broto,et al.  Incorporating the Patient Voice in Sarcoma Research: How Can We Assess Health-Related Quality of Life in This Heterogeneous Group of Patients? A Study Protocol , 2020, Cancers.

[6]  Arlene E. Chung,et al.  Clinical Utility and User Perceptions of a Digital System for Electronic Patient-Reported Symptom Monitoring During Routine Cancer Care: Findings From the PRO-TECT Trial. , 2020, JCO clinical cancer informatics.

[7]  R. Salazar,et al.  Increased survival time or better quality of life? Trade-off between benefits and adverse events in the systemic treatment of cancer , 2019, Clinical and Translational Oncology.

[8]  B. Manns,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of symptom monitoring with patient-reported outcomes during routine cancer treatment , 2018 .

[9]  M. Kris,et al.  Overall Survival Results of a Trial Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes for Symptom Monitoring During Routine Cancer Treatment , 2017, JAMA.

[10]  S. Acaster,et al.  Exploration of oncologists’ attitudes toward and perceived value of patient-reported outcomes , 2013, Quality of Life Research.

[11]  P. Ubel,et al.  How Long and How Well , 2011, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[12]  P. Trask,et al.  Psychometric validation of the cancer therapy satisfaction questionnaire. , 2008, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[13]  U. S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Cen Research,et al.  Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance , 2006, Health and quality of life outcomes.

[14]  D. Bury-Maynard,et al.  Development of the cancer therapy satisfaction questionnaire: item generation and content validity testing. , 2005, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[15]  P. Dolan,et al.  Valuing health states: a comparison of methods. , 1996, Journal of health economics.

[16]  D. Osoba,et al.  The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. , 1993, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.