ASSESSING ORGANIZATIONAL FITNESS ON A DYNAMIC LANDSCAPE: AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF THE RELATIVE INERTIA THESIS

This paper proposes an empirical framework for evaluating the relative structural inertia hypothesis, a central assumption of organizational ecology theories. In stark contrast to the tenets of strategic management, the relative inertia thesis claims that organizations are typically unable to match structural changes to their competitive environments in a timely fashion. The hypothesis is tested for the hospital industry in California during the 1980–90 time frame. Strategic movements in a competition ‘landscape’ are tracked using a variant of the Jaccard similarity coefficient, which has been applied in numerous studies of biological competition. Findings indicate that few hospitals are able to overcome inertial forces in adapting their service portfolios; furthermore, the ability of hospitals to strategically reposition themselves decreases markedly with provider density. Analyses also investigate the relation between organizational attributes (e.g., age, size, mission, and portfolio scope) and adaptability. Implications for both ecological and strategic theory are pursued. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  G. Chase,et al.  Structural Determinants of Hospital Closure , 1984, Medical care.

[2]  Jacques Delacroix,et al.  Cosmetic, Speculative, and Adaptive Organizational Change in the Wine Industry: A Longitudinal Study , 1991 .

[3]  Jay R. Galbraith Organization Design , 1977 .

[4]  J. Alexander,et al.  Effects of market position and competition on rural hospital closures. , 1997, Health services research.

[5]  Heather A. Haveman Organizational size and change: Diversification in the savings and loan industry after deregulation , 1993 .

[6]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[7]  Berry Re On grouping hospitals for economic analysis. , 1973 .

[8]  Jitendra V. Singh,et al.  Theory and Research in Organizational Ecology , 1990 .

[9]  J. Schumpeter Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[10]  C. Shapiro The theory of business strategy. , 1989, The Rand journal of economics.

[11]  M. Hannan,et al.  Social Dynamics: Models and Methods. , 1986 .

[12]  James F. Wilson,et al.  INCENTIVE SYSTEMS: A THEORY OF ORGANIZATIONS , 1961 .

[13]  Terence C. Halliday,et al.  After Minimalism: Transformations of State Bar Associations from Market Dependence to State Reliance, 1918 to 1950 , 1993 .

[14]  Heather A. Haveman Between a rock and a hard place: Organizational change and performance under conditions of fundamental environmental transformation , 1992 .

[15]  J. Hadley,et al.  Profits, Community Role, and Hospital Closure: An Urban and Rural Analysis , 1992, Medical care.

[16]  M. Porter Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance , 1985 .

[17]  H S Luft,et al.  Appropriate measures of hospital market areas. , 1987, Health services research.

[18]  R. Hansell,et al.  A COMMUNITY PERSPECTIVE ON THE MULTIDIMENSIONAL NICHE , 1990 .

[19]  H. Thomas,et al.  Competitive Groups as Cognitive Communities: The Case of Scottish Knitwear Manufacturers Revisited , 1989 .

[20]  Glenn R. Carroll,et al.  Organizational evolution in a multinational context: entries of automobile manufacturers in Belgium, Britain, France, Germany, and Italy , 1995 .

[21]  Paul J. Feldstein,et al.  Health Care Economics , 2017 .

[22]  W. Richard Scott Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems , 1981 .

[23]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[24]  S M Shortell,et al.  The Evolution of Hospital Systems: Unfulfilled Promises and Self-Fulfilling Prophesies , 1988, Medical care review.

[25]  D. Starkweather Hospital mergers in the making , 1981 .

[26]  S. Shortell,et al.  The effects of hospital ownership on nontraditional services. , 1986, Health affairs.

[27]  Henry A. Walker,et al.  Scope Statements: Imperatives for Evaluating Theory , 1985 .

[28]  M. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Evolution: A Metamorphosis Model of Convergence and Reorientation , 1985 .

[29]  C. Fombrun,et al.  What's in a Name? Reputation Building and Corporate Strategy , 1990 .

[30]  Frank Dobbin,et al.  The Expansion of Due Process in Organizations , 1988 .

[31]  D. Cox Regression Models and Life-Tables , 1972 .

[32]  Anand Swaminathan,et al.  Does the pattern of density dependence in organizational mortality rates vary across levels of analysis? evidence from the German brewing industry , 1991 .

[33]  Jan Kmenta,et al.  Elements of econometrics , 1988 .

[34]  S. Oster Intraindustry structure and the ease of strategic change , 1982 .

[35]  J. March Footnotes To Organizational Change , 1980 .

[36]  S. Duffy Do Competitive Hospitals Really Adopt Technology Faster? An Analysis of the Influence of Alternative Relevant Market Definitions , 1992 .

[37]  G. Guo Event-history analysis for left-truncated data. , 1993, Sociological methodology.

[38]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  MODELING INTERNAL ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE , 1995 .

[39]  C. Oliver STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO INSTITUTIONAL PROCESSES , 1991 .

[40]  M. Hannan,et al.  A Time to Grow and a Time to Die: Growth and Mortality of Credit Unions in New York City, 1914-1990 , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.