Minimizing GPS Dependency for a Vehicle’s Trajectory Identification by Using Data from Smartphone Inertial Sensors and Onboard Diagnostics Device

For the past few years, several studies have focused on identifying a vehicle’s trajectory with smartphone data. However, these studies predominantly used GPS coordinate information for that purpose. Considering the known limitations of GPS, such as connectivity issues at urban canyons and underpasses, low precision of localization, and high power consumption of smartphones while GPS is in use, this paper focuses on developing alternative methods for identifying a vehicle’s trajectory at an intersection with sensor data other than GPS to minimize GPS dependency. In particular, accelerometer and gyroscope data collected with smartphone inertial sensors and speed data collected with an onboard diagnostics device are used to develop algorithms for maneuver (i.e., left and right turns and through) and trip direction identification at an intersection. In addition, techniques for noise removal and orientation correction from raw inertial sensor data are described. The effectiveness of the method for trajectory identification is assessed with collected field data. Results demonstrate that the developed method is effective in identifying a vehicle’s trajectory at an intersection. Overall, this research shows the feasibility of using alternative sensor data for trajectory identification and thus eliminating the need for continuous GPS connectivity.

[1]  Tamer Nadeem,et al.  SpyLoc: A light weight localization system for smartphones , 2013, 2014 Eleventh Annual IEEE International Conference on Sensing, Communication, and Networking (SECON).

[2]  Erhan Akin,et al.  Estimating driving behavior by a smartphone , 2012, 2012 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium.

[3]  Sasu Tarkoma,et al.  Accelerometer-based transportation mode detection on smartphones , 2013, SenSys '13.

[4]  Richard P. Martin,et al.  Sensing vehicle dynamics for determining driver phone use , 2013, MobiSys '13.

[5]  Eylem Ekici,et al.  Vehicular Networking: A Survey and Tutorial on Requirements, Architectures, Challenges, Standards and Solutions , 2011, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[6]  James Biagioni,et al.  Cooperative transit tracking using smart-phones , 2010, SenSys '10.

[7]  Takahiko Kusakabe,et al.  Probe Vehicle-based Traffic Flow Estimation Method without Fundamental Diagram , 2015 .

[8]  Hui Liu,et al.  Optimal Placement and Configuration of Roadside Units in Vehicular Networks , 2012, 2012 IEEE 75th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[9]  Pai H. Chou,et al.  Accurate battery lifetime estimation using high-frequency power profile emulation , 2005, ISLPED '05. Proceedings of the 2005 International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design, 2005..

[10]  Muhammad Tayyab Asif,et al.  Online map-matching based on Hidden Markov model for real-time traffic sensing applications , 2012, 2012 15th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[11]  Paramvir Bahl,et al.  I am a smartphone and I know my user is driving , 2014, 2014 Sixth International Conference on Communication Systems and Networks (COMSNETS).

[12]  Dieter Pfoser,et al.  On Map-Matching Vehicle Tracking Data , 2005, VLDB.

[13]  Mecit Cetin Estimating Queue Dynamics at Signalized Intersections from Probe Vehicle Data , 2012 .

[14]  Srdjan Capkun,et al.  On the requirements for successful GPS spoofing attacks , 2011, CCS '11.

[15]  Hari Balakrishnan,et al.  Accurate, Low-Energy Trajectory Mapping for Mobile Devices , 2011, NSDI.

[16]  Moustafa Youssef,et al.  It's the Human that Matters: Accurate User Orientation Estimation for Mobile Computing Applications , 2014, MobiQuitous.

[17]  Michel Bierlaire,et al.  A Probabilistic Map Matching Method for Smartphone GPS data , 2013 .

[18]  Cecilia Mascolo,et al.  Mining users' significant driving routes with low-power sensors , 2014, SenSys.