Stuck in the Past: Why Managers Persist with New Product Failures

In this research, the authors examine the phenomenon of escalation bias in the context of managing new product introductions. In particular, they identify three general paths—Decision Involvement Inertia, Decision Involvement Distortion, and Belief Inertia Distortion—that can lead managers to escalate their commitments. The authors test the relative strength of these paths in driving observed escalation behavior. The results show that involvement with the initial decision, a key construct in numerous explanations for escalation behavior (e.g., agency theory, self-justification), is not a necessary condition to induce commitment to a losing course of action (i.e., escalation bias). Rather, the authors find that the driving force behind escalation behavior is improper use of initial positive beliefs in the face of negative new information. This insight has implications for the groundwork necessary for organizations to design systems, policies, and procedures to help them avoid the trap of escalation bias that is often associated with major strategic decisions.

[1]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[2]  Jacob Cohen A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[3]  Ian I. Mitroff,et al.  The Subjective Side of Science , 1969 .

[4]  H. J. Einhorn The use of nonlinear, noncompensatory models in decision making. , 1970, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  R. A. Wicklund,et al.  Perspectives on cognitive dissonance , 1976 .

[6]  Joseph P. Martino,et al.  The subjective side of science : Mitroff, Ian I., Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1974, 329 pp., $11.50 , 1976 .

[7]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Knee-deep in the Big Muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. , 1976 .

[8]  Clifford R. Mynatt,et al.  Confirmation Bias in a Simulated Research Environment: An Experimental Study of Scientific Inference , 1977 .

[9]  John B. Kidd,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives—Preferences and Value Tradeoffs , 1977 .

[10]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. , 1977 .

[11]  Clifford R. Mynatt,et al.  Consequences of Confirmation and Disconfirmation in a Simulated Research Environment , 1978 .

[12]  Daniel W. McAllister,et al.  The Contingency Model for the Selection of Decision Strategies: An Empirical Test. , 1978 .

[13]  J. Hausman Specification tests in econometrics , 1978 .

[14]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Confidence in judgment: Persistence of the illusion of validity. , 1978 .

[15]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[16]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[17]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[18]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  The Trapped Administrator: Effects of Job Insecurity and Policy Resistance upon Commitment to a Course of Action. , 1979 .

[19]  J. Bettman An information processing theory of consumer choice , 1979 .

[20]  B. R. Schlenker Impression Management: The Self-Concept, Social Identity, and Interpersonal Relations , 1980 .

[21]  B. M. Staw The Escalation of Commitment To a Course of Action , 1981 .

[22]  Joel Brockner,et al.  Face-Saving and Entrapment , 1981 .

[23]  Max H. Bazerman,et al.  The Relevance of Kahneman and Tversky's Concept of Framing to Organizational Behavior , 1984 .

[24]  Gregory B. Northcraft,et al.  Dollars, Sense, and Sunk Costs: A Life Cycle Model of Resource Allocation Decisions , 1984 .

[25]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Compensatory Choice Models of Noncompensatory Processes: The Effect of Varying Context , 1984 .

[26]  Joel Brockner,et al.  Entrapment in escalating conflicts , 1985 .

[27]  P. Tetlock Accountability: The neglected social context of judgment and choice. , 1985 .

[28]  H. Arkes,et al.  The Psychology of Sunk Cost , 1985 .

[29]  Stephen J. Hoch,et al.  Consumer Learning: Advertising and the Ambiguity of Product Experience , 1986 .

[30]  Glen Whyte,et al.  Escalating Commitment to a Course of Action: A Reinterpretation , 1986 .

[31]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Expo 86: An Escalation Prototype. , 1986 .

[32]  Charles H. Schwenk Information, Cognitive Biases, and Commitment to a Course of Action , 1986 .

[33]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Behavior in escalation situations: Antecedents, prototypes, and solutions. , 1987 .

[34]  Michael G. Bowen The Escalation Phenomenon Reconsidered: Decision Dilemmas or Decision Errors? , 1987 .

[35]  William Samuelson,et al.  Status quo bias in decision making , 1988 .

[36]  Dennis Duchon,et al.  An Empirical Test of Staw and Ross's Prescriptions for the Management of Escalation of Commitment Behavior in Organizations* , 1989 .

[37]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Social and cognitive strategies for coping with accountability: conformity, complexity, and bolstering. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[38]  W. D. Perreault,et al.  Reliability of Nominal Data Based on Qualitative Judgments , 1989 .

[39]  Terence R. Mitchell,et al.  The status quo tendency in decision making , 1990 .

[40]  Max H. Bazerman,et al.  Nonrational escalation of commitment in negotiation , 1992 .

[41]  Itamar Simonson,et al.  Deescalation Strategies: A Comparison of Techniques for Reducing Commitment to Losing Courses of Action , 1992 .

[42]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[43]  J. Brockner The Escalation of Commitment to a Failing Course of Action: Toward Theoretical Progress , 1992 .

[44]  N. Sanders,et al.  Journal of behavioral decision making: "The need for contextual and technical knowledge in judgmental forecasting", 5 (1992) 39-52 , 1992 .

[45]  Donald E. Conlon,et al.  The Role of Project Completion Information in Resource Allocation Decisions , 1993 .

[46]  Gopal Kanji,et al.  100 Statistical Tests , 1994 .

[47]  Donald R. Lehmann,et al.  Understanding managers' strategic decision-making process , 1994 .

[48]  Escalating commitment to a failing course of action: Separating the roles of choice and justification. , 1994 .

[49]  Chip Heath,et al.  Escalation and De-escalation of Commitment in Response to Sunk Costs: The Role of Budgeting in Mental Accounting , 1995 .

[50]  Mark Keil,et al.  ESCALATION OF COMMITMENT IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT: A COMPARISON OF THREE THEORIES. , 1995 .

[51]  Peter A. Bamberger,et al.  Strategic and Tactical Logics of Decision Justification: Power and Decision Criteria in Organizations , 1995 .

[52]  R. Lipshitz The Road to Desert Storm , 1995 .

[53]  J. Klayman Varieties of Confirmation Bias , 1995 .

[54]  G. Marchant,et al.  Justification Of Decisions In Auditing , 1995 .

[55]  Christopher K. Hsee Elastic Justification: How Tempting But Task-Irrelevant Factors Influence Decisions , 1995 .

[56]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Sunk Costs in the NBA: Why Draft Order Affects Playing Time and Survival in Professional Basketball , 1995 .

[57]  H. Raiffa,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Decision Theory , 1996 .

[58]  D. Medin,et al.  Decision making from a cognitive perspective , 1995 .

[59]  J. Scott Armstrong,et al.  University of Pennsylvania Scholarlycommons the Ombudsman: Management Folklore and Management Science: on Portfolio Planning, Escalation Bias and Such the Ombudsman: Management Folklore and Management Science: on Portfolio Planning, Escalation Bias and Such Management Folklore and Management Science , 2022 .

[60]  Alison L. Chasteen,et al.  Private vs Public Expressions of Racial Prejudice , 1996 .

[61]  Richard Staelin,et al.  Pulling the Plug to Stop the New Product Drain , 1997 .

[62]  Margaret G. Meloy,et al.  Predecisional Distortion of Product Information , 1998 .

[63]  R. Calantone,et al.  Are Really New Product Development Projects Harder to Shut Down , 1998 .

[64]  Mark Keil,et al.  Turning Around Troubled Software Projects: An Exploratory Study of the Deescalation of Commitment to Failing Courses of Action , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[65]  Roberto A. Weber,et al.  The econometrics and behavioral economics of escalation of commitment: a re-examination of Staw and Hoang’s NBA data , 1999 .

[66]  R. Staelin,et al.  The Quality Double Whammy , 1999 .

[67]  Mark Keil,et al.  Why Software Projects Escalate: An Empirical Analysis and Test of Four Theoretical Models , 2000, MIS Q..

[68]  S. Schulz-Hardt,et al.  Confirmation bias in sequential information search after preliminary decisions: an expansion of dissonance theoretical research on selective exposure to information. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[69]  J. E. Russo,et al.  Biased interpretation of evidence by mock jurors. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[70]  Oswald Huber,et al.  Accounting and convincing: The effect of two types of justification on the decision process. , 2001 .

[71]  Philip Bromiley,et al.  Banking on commitment: Intended and unintended consequences of an organization's attempt to attenuate escalation of commitment , 2002 .