Predator-prey interactions across hunting mode, spatial domain size, and habitat complexities.

Predator-prey interactions are a fundamental part of community ecology, yet the relative importance of consumptive and nonconsumptive effects (NCEs) (defined as a risk-induced response that alters prey fitness) has not been resolved. Theory suggests that the emergence and subsequent predominance of consumptive or NCEs depend on the given habitat's complexity as well as predator hunting mode and spatial domain sizes of both predator and prey, but their relative influence on the outcome of predator-prey interactions is unknown. We built agent-based models in NetLogo to simulate predator-prey interactions for three hunting modes-sit-and-wait, sit-and-pursue, and active-while concurrently simulating large versus small spatial domain sizes for both predators and prey. We studied (1) how hunting mode and spatial domain size interact to influence the emergence of consumptive or NCEs and (2) how, when NCEs do dominate, hunting mode and spatial domain separately or additively determine prey shifts in time, space, and habitat use. Our results indicate consumptive effects only dominate for active predators when prey habitat domains overlap completely with the predator's spatial domain and when sit-and-wait and sit-and-pursue predators and their prey both have large spatial domains. Prey are most likely to survive when they shift their time but most frequently shift their habitat. Our paper helps to better understand the underlying mechanisms that drive consumptive or NCEs to be most dominant.

[1]  M. T. Baumgartner,et al.  Phylogenetically and morphologically close ambush piscivores can elicit different antipredatory responses in characid prey , 2021, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[2]  Decision letter for "Effects of ungulate density and sociality on landscape heterogeneity: a mechanistic modeling approach" , 2021 .

[3]  C. Packer,et al.  Reactive anti-predator behavioral strategy shaped by predator characteristics , 2021, PloS one.

[4]  Burt P. Kotler,et al.  The context dependence of non-consumptive predator effects. , 2020, Ecology letters.

[5]  S. Peacor,et al.  Non-consumptive predator effects on prey population size: a dearth of evidence. , 2020, The Journal of animal ecology.

[6]  Katrin M. Meyer,et al.  The nlrx r package: A next‐generation framework for reproducible NetLogo model analyses , 2019, Methods in Ecology and Evolution.

[7]  H. Fritz,et al.  Non-consumptive effects of predation in large terrestrial mammals: Mapping our knowledge and revealing the tip of the iceberg , 2019, Biological Conservation.

[8]  J. Pauli,et al.  Habitat complexity mediates the predator-prey space race. , 2019, Ecology.

[9]  T. Higham,et al.  Determinants of predation success: How to survive an attack from a rattlesnake , 2019, Functional Ecology.

[10]  Donald L. DeAngelis,et al.  Decision-Making in Agent-Based Modeling: A Current Review and Future Prospectus , 2019, Front. Ecol. Evol..

[11]  D. Macdonald,et al.  Zebra diel migrations reduce encounter risk with lions at night , 2018, The Journal of animal ecology.

[12]  Justin S. Brashares,et al.  The influence of human disturbance on wildlife nocturnality , 2018, Science.

[13]  Pierre Gentine,et al.  The impact of anthropogenic land use and land cover change on regional climate extremes , 2017, Nature Communications.

[14]  O. Schmitz.  Predator and prey functional traits: understanding the adaptive machinery driving predator–prey interactions , 2017, F1000Research.

[15]  O. Schmitz,et al.  Toward a community ecology of landscapes: predicting multiple predator-prey interactions across geographic space. , 2017, Ecology.

[16]  S. Creel,et al.  Risky times and risky places interact to affect prey behaviour , 2017, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[17]  H. Pereira,et al.  Rewilding: A Call for Boosting Ecological Complexity in Conservation , 2017 .

[18]  Simon A. Levin,et al.  Modeling tiger population and territory dynamics using an agent-based approach , 2015 .

[19]  D. Kuijper,et al.  A “death trap” in the landscape of fear , 2015, Mammal Research.

[20]  H. Sand,et al.  Decomposing risk: landscape structure and wolf behavior generate different predation patterns in two sympatric ungulates. , 2013, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[21]  Patrick A. Zollner,et al.  SEARCH: Spatially Explicit Animal Response to Composition of Habitat , 2013, PloS one.

[22]  R. Boonstra.  The ecology of stress: a marriage of disciplines , 2013 .

[23]  M. C. Ferrari,et al.  Learning Temporal Patterns of Risk in a Predator-Diverse Environment , 2012, PloS one.

[24]  S. Creel.  Toward a predictive theory of risk effects: hypotheses for prey attributes and compensatory mortality. , 2011, Ecology.

[25]  G. Trussell,et al.  Landscape of fear influences the relative importance of consumptive and nonconsumptive predator effects. , 2011, Ecology.

[26]  C. Krebs,et al.  From process to pattern: how fluctuating predation risk impacts the stress axis of snowshoe hares during the 10-year cycle , 2011, Oecologia.

[27]  O. Schmitz,et al.  Physiological Stress as a Fundamental Mechanism Linking Predation to Ecosystem Functioning , 2010, The American Naturalist.

[28]  S. Creel,et al.  Relationships between direct predation and risk effects. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[29]  Oswald J. Schmitz,et al.  Effects of Predator Hunting Mode on Grassland Ecosystem Function , 2008, Science.

[30]  John L. Orrock,et al.  Predator hunting mode and habitat domain alter nonconsumptive effects in predator-prey interactions. , 2007, Ecology.

[31]  O. Schmitz,et al.  Predator diversity and trophic interactions. , 2007, Ecology.

[32]  Andrea Saltelli,et al.  An effective screening design for sensitivity analysis of large models , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[33]  P. Abrams.  Defining and measuring the impact of dynamic traits on interspecific interactions. , 2007, Ecology.

[34]  J. Travis,et al.  Modelling species' range shifts in a changing climate: the impacts of biotic interactions, dispersal distance and the rate of climate change. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.

[35]  P. Ewanchuk,et al.  Habitat effects on the relative importance of trait- and density-mediated indirect interactions. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[36]  L. Dill,et al.  Does tiger shark predation risk influence foraging habitat use by bottlenose dolphins at multiple spatial scales , 2006 .

[37]  S. Creel,et al.  Elk alter habitat selection as an antipredator response to wolves , 2005 .

[38]  W. Thuiller.  Patterns and uncertainties of species' range shifts under climate change , 2004 .

[39]  L. Barmuta,et al.  Habitat structural complexity mediates the foraging success of multiple predator species , 2004, Oecologia.

[40]  Oswald J. Schmitz,et al.  Trophic cascades : the primacy of trait-mediated indirect interactions , 2004 .

[41]  S. Peacor,et al.  A REVIEW OF TRAIT-MEDIATED INDIRECT INTERACTIONS IN ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES , 2003 .

[42]  Oswald J. Schmitz,et al.  From interesting details to dynamical relevance: toward more effective use of empirical insights in theory construction , 2001 .

[43]  O. Schmitz,et al.  Predator and Prey Models with Flexible Individual Behavior and Imperfect Information , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[44]  Randall J. Bernot,et al.  Predator identity and consumer behavior: differential effects of fish and crayfish on the habitat use of a freshwater snail , 1999, Oecologia.

[45]  Max D. Morris,et al.  Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments , 1991 .

[46]  Robert L. McLaughlin,et al.  Search Modes of Birds and Lizards: Evidence for Alternative Movement Patterns , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[47]  S. Holbrook,et al.  Effects of predation risk on foraging behavior: mechanisms altering patch choice☆ , 1988 .

[48]  Peter A. Abrams,et al.  Foraging Time Optimization and Interactions in Food Webs , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[49]  A. Sih.  The Behavioral Response Race Between Predator and Prey , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[50]  W. H. Burt.  Territoriality and Home Range Concepts as Applied to Mammals , 1943 .

[51]  O. Schmitz,et al.  Fear on the move: predator hunting mode predicts variation in prey mortality and plasticity in prey spatial response. , 2014, The Journal of animal ecology.

[52]  Erlend B. Nilsen,et al.  Habitat heterogeneity and mammalian predator–prey interactions , 2012 .

[53]  J. Bascompte,et al.  Ecological networks--beyond food webs. , 2009, The Journal of animal ecology.

[54]  S. L. Lima.  Nonlethal Effects in the Ecology of Predator-Prey Interactions What are the ecological effects of anti-predator decision-making? , 1998 .