An iterative projection-based motion estimation and compensation scheme for head x-ray CT.

PURPOSE Although current computed tomography (CT) systems can scan the head in a very short time, patient motion sometimes still induces artifacts. If motion occurs, one has to repeat the scan; to avoid motion, sedation or anesthesia is sometimes applied. METHODS The authors propose a method to iteratively estimate and compensate this motion during the reconstruction. In every iteration, the rigid motion was estimated view-by-view and then used to update the system matrix. A multiresolution scheme was used to speed up the convergence of this joint estimation of the image and the motion of the subject. A final iterative reconstruction was performed with the last motion estimate. RESULTS The method was evaluated on simulations, patient scans, and a phantom study. The quality of the reconstructed images was improved substantially after the compensation. In simulation and phantom studies, root-mean-square error was reduced and mean structural similarity was increased. In the patient studies, most of the motion blurring in the reconstructed images disappeared after the compensation. CONCLUSIONS The proposed method effectively eliminated motion-induced artifacts in head CT scans. Since only measured raw data are needed for the motion estimation and compensation, the proposed method can be applied retrospectively to clinical helical CT scans affected by motion.

[1]  B. De Man,et al.  Distance-driven projection and backprojection in three dimensions. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Thorsten M. Buzug,et al.  Sinogram-Based Motion Detection in Transmission Computed Tomography , 2009 .

[3]  Hengyong Yu,et al.  Data Consistency Based Rigid Motion Artifact Reduction in Fan-Beam CT , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  A. Savitzky,et al.  Smoothing and Differentiation of Data by Simplified Least Squares Procedures. , 1964 .

[5]  J-H Kim,et al.  Correction for human head motion in helical x-ray CT , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  M J Ackerman,et al.  The Visible Human Project , 1998, Proc. IEEE.

[7]  Z Kuncic,et al.  A rigid motion correction method for helical computed tomography (CT) , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  W A Kalender,et al.  Simultaneous misalignment correction for approximate circular cone-beam computed tomography. , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  Yurii Nesterov,et al.  Smooth minimization of non-smooth functions , 2005, Math. Program..

[10]  Jiang Hsieh,et al.  Data consistency based translational motion artifact reduction in fan-beam CT , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  H. Malcolm Hudson,et al.  Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[12]  Roger Fulton,et al.  The feasibility of head motion tracking in helical CT: a step toward motion correction. , 2013, Medical physics.

[13]  Franklin Dexter,et al.  Growth Rates in Pediatric Diagnostic Imaging and Sedation , 2009, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[14]  G T Gullberg,et al.  Estimation of geometrical parameters and collimator evaluation for cone beam tomography. , 1990, Medical physics.

[15]  Zhou Yu,et al.  Kinetic parameter reconstruction for motion compensation in transmission tomography , 2011, Electronic Imaging.

[16]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[17]  M. Defrise,et al.  Iterative reconstruction for helical CT: a simulation study. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  Michael A. Speidel,et al.  Motion artifact reduction in fan-beam and cone-beam computed tomography via the fan-beam data consistency condition (FDCC) , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[19]  Weiguo Lu,et al.  Tomographic motion detection and correction directly in sinogram space. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  T Varslot,et al.  Reliable automatic alignment of tomographic projection data by passive auto-focus. , 2011, Medical physics.

[21]  Christopher Rohkohl,et al.  Improving best-phase image quality in cardiac CT by motion correction with MAM optimization. , 2013, Medical physics.

[22]  Rolf Clackdoyle,et al.  Data consistency conditions for truncated fanbeam and parallel projections. , 2015, Medical physics.

[23]  Yongmin Kim,et al.  Correction of computed tomography motion artifacts using pixel-specific back-projection , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[24]  Julia F. Barrett,et al.  Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance. , 2004, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.