Biopolymers Used for Receptor Immobilization for Nickel-Detection Biosensors in Food

Food is humans’ main source of nickel intake, which is responsible for the prevalence of allergic contact dermatitis and other pathological afflictions. While robust, the classical methods for nickel detection—atomic absorption spectrometry and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry—are expensive and laborious; in contrast, modern methods that utilize sensors—of which most are electrochemical—have rapid run times, are cost-effective, and are easily assembled. Here, we describe the use of four biopolymers (alginate, agar, chitosan, and carrageenan) for receptor immobilization on biosensors to detect nickel ions and use an optimization approach with three biopolymer concentrations to assay analytical performance profiles. We measured the total performance of screen-printed carbon electrodes immobilized with the biopolymer–sensor combinations using cyclic voltammetry (CV). Voltammetric behavior favored the carrageenan biosensor, based on performance characteristics measured using CV, with sensitivities of 2.68 (for 1% biopolymer concentration) and 2.08 (for 0.5% biopolymer concentration). Our results indicated that among the four biopolymer combinations, carrageenan with urease affixed to screen-printed electrodes was effective at coupling for nickel detection.

[1]  Enrico Ferrari Gold Nanoparticle-Based Plasmonic Biosensors , 2023, Biosensors.

[2]  Liping Zhong,et al.  An electrochemical immunosensor for the detection of Glypican-3 based on enzymatic ferrocene-tyramine deposition reaction. , 2023, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[3]  J. Ulstrup,et al.  One-step electrochemical approach of enzyme immobilization for bioelectrochemical applications , 2022, Synthetic Metals.

[4]  G. Wang,et al.  A Scalable Bacterial Cellulose Ionogel for Multisensory Electronic Skin , 2022, Research.

[5]  Pranjal Chandra,et al.  Marine biological macromolecules as matrix material for biosensor fabrication , 2022, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[6]  G. Gutt,et al.  Development, Optimization, Characterization, and Application of Electrochemical Biosensors for Detecting Nickel Ions in Food , 2021, Biosensors.

[7]  E. Valero,et al.  On the performance of carbon-based screen-printed electrodes for (in)organic hydroperoxides sensing in rainwater. , 2021, Talanta.

[8]  L. Basabe‐Desmonts,et al.  Alginate Bead Biosystem for the Determination of Lactate in Sweat Using Image Analysis , 2021, Biosensors.

[9]  A. C. Marr,et al.  Enzyme entrapment, biocatalyst immobilization without covalent attachment , 2021, Green Chemistry.

[10]  A. Xiao,et al.  Convenient Agarose Preparation with Hydrogen Peroxide and Desulfation Process Analysis , 2021, Marine drugs.

[11]  G. Alberti,et al.  Current Trends in Polymer Based Sensors , 2021 .

[12]  W. Coltro,et al.  Paper-based analytical device with colorimetric detection for urease activity determination in soils and evaluation of potential inhibitors. , 2021, Talanta.

[13]  A. G. Bannov,et al.  Recent Advances in Ammonia Gas Sensors Based on Carbon Nanomaterials , 2021, Micromachines.

[14]  M. Howlader,et al.  Electrochemical sensing: A prognostic tool in the fight against COVID-19 , 2021, TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry.

[15]  Xiaogang Lin,et al.  Materials and Methods of Biosensor Interfaces With Stability , 2021, Frontiers in Materials.

[16]  Nam-Young Kim,et al.  Electrochemical SARS-CoV-2 Sensing at Point-of-Care and Artificial Intelligence for Intelligent COVID-19 Management , 2020, ACS applied bio materials.

[17]  B. Lakard Electrochemical Biosensors Based on Conducting Polymers: A Review , 2020, Applied Sciences.

[18]  N. Jaffrezic‐Renault,et al.  Electrochemical sensors based on molecularly imprinted chitosan: A review , 2020, TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry.

[19]  L. Mazzei,et al.  The structure-based reaction mechanism of urease, a nickel dependent enzyme: tale of a long debate , 2020, JBIC Journal of Biological Inorganic Chemistry.

[20]  Rachel Samson,et al.  Biosensors: frontiers in rapid detection of COVID-19 , 2020, 3 Biotech.

[21]  Yanbing Yang,et al.  Chemically modified nucleic acid biopolymers used in biosensing , 2020, Materials Chemistry Frontiers.

[22]  Brenda G. Molina,et al.  Polymers and Plastics Modified Electrodes for Biosensors: A Review , 2020, Molecules.

[23]  Liliana Norocel,et al.  Screen-Printed Voltammetric Biosensors for the Determination of Copper in Wine , 2019, Sensors.

[24]  Chao He,et al.  Safe and Effective Removal of Urea by Urease-Immobilized, Carboxyl-Functionalized PES Beads with Good Reusability and Storage Stability , 2019, ACS Omega.

[25]  S. Hossain,et al.  Biosensors for on-line water quality monitoring – a review , 2019, Arab Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences.

[26]  G. Gutt,et al.  Development and performance testing of an electrochemical sensor for determination of iron ions in wine , 2018, Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research.

[27]  Naris Barnthip,et al.  Electrospun Chitosan-Gelatin Biopolymer Composite Nanofibers for Horseradish Peroxidase Immobilization in a Hydrogen Peroxide Biosensor , 2017, Biosensors.

[28]  P. Norouzi,et al.  Potentiometric Urea Biosensor Based on Immobilization of Urease in Kappa-Carrageenan Biopolymer , 2017 .

[29]  R. Fernández-Lafuente,et al.  Agarose and Its Derivatives as Supports for Enzyme Immobilization , 2016, Molecules.

[30]  A. Pestov,et al.  Chitosan and Its Derivatives as Highly Efficient Polymer Ligands , 2016, Molecules.

[31]  Anthony P F Turner,et al.  Biosensors: sense and sensibility. , 2013, Chemical Society reviews.

[32]  S. Uchiyama,et al.  Polymers for Biosensors Construction , 2013 .

[33]  E. Denkbaş,et al.  Carbon nanotube-chitosan modified disposable pencil graphite electrode for vitamin B12 analysis. , 2011, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[34]  M. Elnashar Biotechnology of Biopolymers , 2011 .

[35]  S. Jacob,et al.  Systemic Contact Dermatitis in Children: How an Avoidance Diet Can Make a Difference , 2011, Pediatric dermatology.

[36]  H. Carlsson,et al.  Computational Modeling of the Mechanism of Urease , 2010, Bioinorganic chemistry and applications.

[37]  E. Warshaw,et al.  Nickel hypersensitivity: a clinical review and call to action , 2010, International journal of dermatology.

[38]  J. Vörös,et al.  Electrochemical Biosensors - Sensor Principles and Architectures , 2008, Sensors.

[39]  A. M. Kayastha,et al.  Immobilization of Urease from Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) on Agar Tablets and Its Application in Urea Assay , 2007, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.

[40]  G. Demirel,et al.  Immobilization of urease by using chitosan–alginate and poly(acrylamide-co-acrylic acid)/κ-carrageenan supports , 2006, Bioprocess and biosystems engineering.

[41]  B. Krajewska,et al.  Free vs chitosan-immobilized urease: Microenvironmental effects on enzyme inhibitions , 2005 .

[42]  S. Jacob,et al.  Update on systemic nickel allergy syndrome and diet. , 2015, European annals of allergy and clinical immunology.

[43]  O. Prakash,et al.  Immobilization of a Thermostable -Amylase on Agarose and Agar Matrices and its Application in Starch Stain Removal , 2011 .

[44]  Neelam P. Mishra,et al.  Immobilization of urease in alginate, paraffin and lac , 2010 .

[45]  John F. Kennedy,et al.  Metal complexation by chitosan and its derivatives: a review , 2004 .