Reversed Depth in Anticorrelated Random-Dot Stereograms and the Central-Peripheral Difference in Visual Inference

In a random-dot stereogram, the percept of object surfaces in a three-dimensional scene is generated by images presented to left and right eyes that comprise interocularly corresponding random black and white dots. The spatial disparities between the corresponding dots determine the depths of object surfaces. If the dots are anticorrelated, such that a black dot in one monocular image corresponds to a white dot in the other, disparity-tuned neurons in the primary visual cortex (V1) respond as if their preferred disparities become nonpreferred and vice versa, thereby reversing the disparity signs reported to higher visual areas. Typically, when viewing anticorrelated random-dot stereograms presented in the central visual field, humans have great difficulty perceiving the reversed depth or indeed any coherent depth at all. We report that the reversed depth is more easily perceived in the peripheral visual field, supporting a recently proposed central-peripheral dichotomy in the way that feedback from higher to lower visual cortical areas implements visual inference.

[1]  I. G. Priest The Optical Society of America , 1962, Nature.

[2]  Bruce G Cumming,et al.  Neurons in Striate Cortex Signal Disparity in Half-Matched Random-Dot Stereograms , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  Takahiro Doi,et al.  Matching and correlation computations in stereoscopic depth perception. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[4]  Li Zhaoping,et al.  Gaze capture by eye-of-origin singletons: interdependence with awareness. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[5]  Ichiro Fujita,et al.  Disparity-energy signals in perceived stereoscopic depth. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[6]  Bruce G. Cumming,et al.  Adaptation to Natural Binocular Disparities in Primate V1 Explained by a Generalized Energy Model , 2008, Neuron.

[7]  Takahiro Doi,et al.  Temporal channels and disparity representations in stereoscopic depth perception. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[8]  G. Westheimer The spatial grain of the perifoveal visual field , 1982, Vision Research.

[9]  G Sperling,et al.  Second-order reversed phi , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  S. M. Axstis PHI MOVEMENT AS A SUBTRACTION PROCESS , 1970 .

[11]  Hermann von Helmholtz,et al.  Treatise on Physiological Optics , 1962 .

[12]  Richard A Eagle,et al.  Reversed stereo depth and motion direction with anti-correlated stimuli , 2000, Vision Research.

[13]  D. Mackay,et al.  Towards an information-flow model of human behaviour. , 1956, British journal of psychology.

[14]  N. Qian Binocular Disparity and the Perception of Depth , 1997, Neuron.

[15]  S. Anstis,et al.  Illusory reversal of visual depth and movement during changes of contrast , 1975, Vision Research.

[16]  B G Cumming,et al.  Disparity Detection in Anticorrelated Stereograms , 1998, Perception.

[17]  J. Pokorny Foundations of Cyclopean Perception , 1972 .

[18]  Susumu Tachi,et al.  Unconscious adaptation: a new illusion of depth induced by stimulus features without depth , 2003, Vision Research.

[19]  G. Poggio,et al.  Stereoscopic mechanisms in monkey visual cortex: binocular correlation and disparity selectivity , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[20]  S. Grossberg,et al.  ART 2: self-organization of stable category recognition codes for analog input patterns. , 1987, Applied optics.

[21]  Ichiro Fujita,et al.  A relative frame of reference underlies reversed depth perception in anticorrelated random-dot stereograms. , 2017, Journal of vision.

[22]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Stereoscopic depth discrimination in the visual cortex: neurons ideally suited as disparity detectors. , 1990, Science.

[23]  Li Zhaoping,et al.  Feedback from higher to lower visual areas for visual recognition may be weaker in the periphery: Glimpses from the perception of brief dichoptic stimuli , 2017, Vision Research.

[24]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  A forward-inverse optics model of reciprocal connections between visual cortical areas , 1993 .

[25]  B. G. Cumming,et al.  Responses of primary visual cortical neurons to binocular disparity without depth perception , 1997, Nature.

[26]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  The Helmholtz Machine , 1995, Neural Computation.

[27]  Colin Blakemore,et al.  Probing the human stereoscopic system with reverse correlation , 1999, Nature.

[28]  A J Parker,et al.  Binocular disparity processing with opposite-contrast stimuli. , 1995 .

[29]  R Blake,et al.  Binocular Disparity Processing with Opposite-Contrast Stimuli , 1995, Perception.

[30]  Z. Li,et al.  A model of olfactory adaptation and sensitivity enhancement in the olfactory bulb , 1990, Biological Cybernetics.

[31]  A. Yuille,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.10 No.7 July 2006 Special Issue: Probabilistic models of cognition Vision as Bayesian inference: analysis by synthesis? , 2022 .