Quantifying protein–protein interactions in high throughput using protein domain microarrays

Protein microarrays provide an efficient way to identify and quantify protein–protein interactions in high throughput. One drawback of this technique is that proteins show a broad range of physicochemical properties and are often difficult to produce recombinantly. To circumvent these problems, we have focused on families of protein interaction domains. Here we provide protocols for constructing microarrays of protein interaction domains in individual wells of 96-well microtiter plates, and for quantifying domain–peptide interactions in high throughput using fluorescently labeled synthetic peptides. As specific examples, we will describe the construction of microarrays of virtually every human Src homology 2 (SH2) and phosphotyrosine binding (PTB) domain, as well as microarrays of mouse PDZ domains, all produced recombinantly in Escherichia coli. For domains that mediate high-affinity interactions, such as SH2 and PTB domains, equilibrium dissociation constants (KDs) for their peptide ligands can be measured directly on arrays by obtaining saturation binding curves. For weaker binding domains, such as PDZ domains, arrays are best used to identify candidate interactions, which are then retested and quantified by fluorescence polarization. Overall, protein domain microarrays provide the ability to rapidly identify and quantify protein–ligand interactions with minimal sample consumption. Because entire domain families can be interrogated simultaneously, they provide a powerful way to assess binding selectivity on a proteome-wide scale and provide an unbiased perspective on the connectivity of protein–protein interaction networks.

[1]  Sorina C. Popescu,et al.  MAPK target networks in Arabidopsis thaliana revealed using functional protein microarrays. , 2009, Genes & development.

[2]  S. Fields,et al.  A novel genetic system to detect protein–protein interactions , 1989, Nature.

[3]  S. Fields,et al.  The two-hybrid system: a method to identify and clone genes for proteins that interact with a protein of interest. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Gavin MacBeath,et al.  Predicting PDZ domain–peptide interactions from primary sequences , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[5]  Mingjun Zhang,et al.  Bio-Microarray Fabrication Techniques—A Review , 2006, Critical reviews in biotechnology.

[6]  C. Deane,et al.  Protein Interactions , 2002, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[7]  P. Bork,et al.  Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery , 2006, Nature.

[8]  M. Gerstein,et al.  Global analysis of protein phosphorylation in yeast , 2005, Nature.

[9]  J. M. Boutell,et al.  Functional protein microarrays for parallel characterisation of p53 mutants , 2004, Proteomics.

[10]  James R. Knight,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2000, Nature.

[11]  Gavin MacBeath,et al.  Linear combinations of docking affinities explain quantitative differences in RTK signaling , 2009, Molecular systems biology.

[12]  P. Bork,et al.  Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes , 2002, Nature.

[13]  J. Rothberg,et al.  Gaining confidence in high-throughput protein interaction networks , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[14]  B. Snel,et al.  Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein–protein interactions , 2002, Nature.

[15]  A. Gordus,et al.  System-wide investigation of ErbB4 reveals 19 sites of Tyr phosphorylation that are unusually selective in their recruitment properties. , 2008, Chemistry & biology.

[16]  Raffi Tonikian,et al.  Identifying specificity profiles for peptide recognition modules from phage-displayed peptide libraries , 2007, Nature Protocols.

[17]  Bhupinder Bhullar,et al.  Self-Assembling Protein Microarrays , 2004, Science.

[18]  H. Lehrach,et al.  A Human Protein-Protein Interaction Network: A Resource for Annotating the Proteome , 2005, Cell.

[19]  M. Teresa Pisabarro,et al.  Analysis of PDZ Domain-Ligand Interactions Using Carboxyl-terminal Phage Display* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[20]  S. Fields,et al.  Protein analysis on a proteomic scale , 2003, Nature.

[21]  S. L. Wong,et al.  A Map of the Interactome Network of the Metazoan C. elegans , 2004, Science.

[22]  A. Varshavsky,et al.  Split ubiquitin as a sensor of protein interactions in vivo. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  A. Gordus,et al.  Circumventing the problems caused by protein diversity in microarrays: implications for protein interaction networks. , 2006, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[24]  T. Pawson,et al.  SH2 domains recognize specific phosphopeptide sequences , 1993, Cell.

[25]  R. Russell,et al.  Potential artefacts in protein‐interaction networks , 2002, FEBS letters.

[26]  M. Gerstein,et al.  Global Analysis of Protein Activities Using Proteome Chips , 2001, Science.

[27]  S. L. Wong,et al.  Towards a proteome-scale map of the human protein–protein interaction network , 2005, Nature.

[28]  R. Ozawa,et al.  A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  T. Pawson,et al.  Assembly of Cell Regulatory Systems Through Protein Interaction Domains , 2003, Science.

[30]  J Schultz,et al.  SMART, a simple modular architecture research tool: identification of signaling domains. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  Jiunn R Chen,et al.  PDZ Domain Binding Selectivity Is Optimized Across the Mouse Proteome , 2007, Science.

[32]  James R. Knight,et al.  A Protein Interaction Map of Drosophila melanogaster , 2003, Science.

[33]  G. P. Smith,et al.  Filamentous fusion phage: novel expression vectors that display cloned antigens on the virion surface. , 1985, Science.

[34]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry , 2002, Nature.

[35]  Reed A George The printing process: tips on tips. , 2006, Methods in enzymology.

[36]  Chris Sander,et al.  A Specificity Map for the PDZ Domain Family , 2008, PLoS biology.

[37]  Ming-Ming Zhou,et al.  PTB or not PTB – that is the question , 2002, FEBS letters.

[38]  C. Landry,et al.  An in Vivo Map of the Yeast Protein Interactome , 2008, Science.

[39]  Gavin MacBeath,et al.  Uncovering quantitative protein interaction networks for mouse PDZ domains using protein microarrays. , 2006, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[40]  H. Edelhoch,et al.  Spectroscopic determination of tryptophan and tyrosine in proteins. , 1967, Biochemistry.

[41]  Gavin MacBeath,et al.  A quantitative study of the recruitment potential of all intracellular tyrosine residues on EGFR, FGFR1 and IGF1R. , 2008, Molecular bioSystems.

[42]  Walter Hunziker,et al.  Convergent and Divergent Ligand Specificity among PDZ Domains of the LAP and Zonula Occludens (ZO) Families* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[43]  Gavin MacBeath,et al.  A quantitative protein interaction network for the ErbB receptors using protein microarrays , 2006, Nature.

[44]  S. Schreiber,et al.  Printing proteins as microarrays for high-throughput function determination. , 2000, Science.

[45]  L. Cantley,et al.  Recognition of Unique Carboxyl-Terminal Motifs by Distinct PDZ Domains , 1997, Science.

[46]  M. Taussig,et al.  Single step generation of protein arrays from DNA by cell-free expression and in situ immobilisation (PISA method). , 2001, Nucleic acids research.