Optimal wavelet denoising for phonocardiograms

Phonocardiograms (PCGs), recordings of heart sounds, have many advantages over traditional auscultation in that they may be replayed and analysed for spectral and frequency information. PCG is not a widely used diagnostic tool as it could be. One of the major problems with PCG is noise corruption. Many sources of noise may pollute a PCG including foetal breath sounds if the subject is pregnant, lung and breath sounds, environmental noise and noise from contact between the recording device and the skin. An electronic stethoscope is used to record heart sounds and the problem of extracting noise from the signal is addressed via the use of wavelets and averaging. Using the discrete wavelet transform, the signal is decomposed. Due to the efficient decomposition of heart signals, their wavelet coefficients tend to be much larger than those due to noise. Thus, coefficients below a certain level are regarded as noise and are thresholded out. The signal can then be reconstructed without significant loss of information in the signal content. The questions that this study attempts to answer are which wavelet families, levels of decomposition, and thresholding techniques best remove the noise in a PCG. The use of averaging in combination with wavelet denoising is also addressed. Possible applications of the Hilbert transform to heart sound analysis are discussed.

[1]  Rafael Beyar,et al.  Heart-Sound Processing by Average and Variance Calculation - Physiologic Basic and Clinical Implications , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  Mohammad Ali Tinati Time-frequency and time-scale analysis of phonocardiograms with coronary artery disease before and after angioplasty / by Mohammad Ali Tinati. , 1998 .

[3]  Derek Abbott,et al.  Optimal wavelet denoising for smart biomonitor systems , 2001, SPIE Micro + Nano Materials, Devices, and Applications.

[4]  L. Durand,et al.  Digital signal processing of the phonocardiogram: review of the most recent advancements. , 1995, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[5]  Derek Abbott,et al.  Comparison of automatic denoising methods for phonocardiograms with extraction of signal parameters via the Hilbert Transform , 2001, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[6]  Barbara Hubbard,et al.  The World According to Wavelets , 1996 .

[7]  Metin Akay,et al.  Wavelet applications in medicine , 1997 .

[8]  M. Taner,et al.  Complex seismic trace analysis , 1979 .

[9]  L. Sakari,et al.  Novel software for real-time processing of phonocardiographic signal , 1997, Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 'Magnificent Milestones and Emerging Opportunities in Medical Engineering' (Cat. No.97CH36136).

[10]  C. Marque,et al.  Denoising of the uterine EHG by an undecimated wavelet transform , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  A Theory for Multiresolution Signal Decomposition: The Wavelet Representation , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[12]  C. Burrus,et al.  Introduction to Wavelets and Wavelet Transforms: A Primer , 1997 .

[13]  Okan K. Ersoy,et al.  Fourier-Related Transforms, Fast Algorithms and Applications , 1996 .

[14]  Derek Abbott,et al.  Sensor system for heart sound biomonitor , 1999, Smart Materials, Nano-, and Micro- Smart Systems.

[15]  Xiaolong Dong,et al.  Instantaneous parameters extraction via wavelet transform , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[16]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  Matching pursuits with time-frequency dictionaries , 1993, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[17]  S. Lukkarinen,et al.  A new phonocardiographic recording system , 1997, Computers in Cardiology 1997.