Image motion environments: background noise for movement-based animal signals

Understanding the evolution of animal signals has to include consideration of the structure of signal and noise, and the sensory mechanisms that detect the signals. Considerable progress has been made in understanding sounds and colour signals, however, the degree to which movement-based signals are constrained by the particular patterns of environmental image motion is poorly understood. Here we have quantified the image motion generated by wind-blown plants at 12 sites in the coastal habitat of the Australian lizard Amphibolurus muricatus. Sampling across different plant communities and meteorological conditions revealed distinct image motion environments. At all locations, image motion became more directional and apparent speed increased as wind speeds increased. The magnitude of these changes and the spatial distribution of image motion, however, varied between locations probably as a function of plant structure and the topographic location. In addition, we show that the background motion noise depends strongly on the particular depth-structure of the environment and argue that such microhabitat differences suggest specific strategies to preserve signal efficacy. Movement-based signals and motion processing mechanisms, therefore, may reveal the same type of habitat specific structural variation that we see for signals from other modalities.

[1]  Andrew C. Mason,et al.  Measuring and quantifying dynamic visual signals in jumping spiders , 2006 .

[2]  D. Todt,et al.  Acoustic communication in noise: regulation of call characteristics in a New World monkey , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[3]  J. Zeil,et al.  Towards an Ecology of Motion Vision , 2001 .

[4]  L. M. Potash,et al.  Noise-induced changes in calls of the Japanese quail , 1972 .

[5]  M. Egelhaaf.  On the neuronal basis of figure-ground discrimination by relative motion in the visual system of the fly , 1985 .

[6]  Johannes M. Zanker,et al.  A glimpse into crabworld , 1997, Vision Research.

[7]  D. B. Dusenbery.  Sensory Ecology: How Organisms Acquire and Respond to Information , 1992 .

[8]  R. J. Hardwick.  Nature's larder : a field guide to the native food plants of the NSW South Coast , 2001 .

[9]  R. Haven Wiley,et al.  5 – Adaptations for Acoustic Communication in Birds: Sound Transmission and Signal Detection , 1982 .

[10]  J. Zanker,et al.  Motion vision : computational, neural, and ecological constraints , 2001 .

[11]  H. Slabbekoorn,et al.  Cities Change the Songs of Birds , 2006, Current Biology.

[12]  W. Reichardt,et al.  Properties of individual movement detectors as derived from behavioural experiments on the visual system of the fly , 1988, Biological Cybernetics.

[13]  J. Hailman.  Optical Signals: Animal Communication and Light , 1977 .

[14]  H. Cogger.  Reptiles and Amphibians of Australia , 1975 .

[15]  J. Grace,et al.  Wind and Trees: Tree physiological responses , 1995 .

[16]  C. Clifford,et al.  Measuring the structure of dynamic visual signals , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  Jack W. Bradbury,et al.  Principles of Animal Communication , 1998 .

[18]  J. Endler.  The Color of Light in Forests and Its Implications , 1993 .

[19]  R. Peters,et al.  Display response of the Jacky Dragon, Amphibolurus muricatus (Lacertilia: Agamidae), to intruders: A semi-Markovian process , 2003 .

[20]  L. Fleishman.  Sensory and environmental influences on display form in Anolis auratus, a grass anole from Panama , 1988, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[21]  R. Peters.  Environmental motion delays the detection of movement-based signals , 2008, Biology Letters.

[22]  Wolfgang Stürzl,et al.  Depth, contrast and view-based homing in outdoor scenes , 2007, Biological Cybernetics.

[23]  R. Peters,et al.  Signaling against the Wind: Modifying Motion-Signal Structure in Response to Increased Noise , 2007, Current Biology.

[24]  W. E. Miller,et al.  The visual ecology of Puerto Rican anoline lizards: habitat light and spectral sensitivity , 1997, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[25]  M. Egelhaaf.  On the neuronal basis of figure-ground discrimination by relative motion in the visual system of the fly , 1985 .

[26]  C. Wood,et al.  Wind and Trees: Understanding wind forces on trees , 1995 .

[27]  S. Jacobs,et al.  Native Trees and Shrubs of South-Eastern Australia , 1983 .

[28]  Michael J. Ryan,et al.  How cricket frog females deal with a noisy world: habitat-related differences in auditory tuning , 2005 .

[29]  J. Cynx,et al.  Amplitude regulation of vocalizations in noise by a songbird,Taeniopygia guttata , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[30]  P. Hannah,et al.  Wind and Trees: Predicting windspeeds for forest areas in complex terrain , 1995 .

[31]  J M Zanker,et al.  Movement-induced motion signal distributions in outdoor scenes , 2005, Network.

[32]  R. A. Peters,et al.  Design of the Jacky dragon visual display: signal and noise characteristics in a complex moving environment , 2003, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[33]  L. Fleishman.  The Influence of the Sensory System and the Environment on Motion Patterns in the Visual Displays of Anoline Lizards and Other Vertebrates , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[34]  J. Endler,et al.  Interacting Effects of Lek Placement, Display Behavior, Ambient Light, and Color Patterns in Three Neotropical Forest-Dwelling Birds , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[35]  L. Fleishman.  Motion detection in the presence and absence of background motion in anAnolis lizard , 1986, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[36]  M. Egelhaaf,et al.  Responses of blowfly motion-sensitive neurons to reconstructed optic flow along outdoor flight paths , 2005, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[37]  Donald E. Kroodsma,et al.  Production, perception, and design features of sounds , 1982 .

[38]  Peter M. Narins,et al.  Anthropogenic sounds differentially affect amphibian call rate , 2005 .

[39]  Ibbotson.  PII: S0042-6989(01)00126-2 , 2001 .

[40]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Interspecific acoustic interactions among katydids Neoconocephalus: inhibition-induced shifts in diel periodicity , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[41]  J. Lythgoe.  The Ecology of vision , 1979 .

[42]  J A Endler,et al.  Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[43]  R Blake,et al.  Visual form created solely from temporal structure. , 1999, Science.

[44]  P. Slater,et al.  The effects of rain on acoustic communication: tawny owls have good reason for calling less in wet weather , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[45]  Farid I. Kandil,et al.  Figure–ground segregation can rely on differences in motion direction , 2004, Vision Research.

[46]  R. Peters,et al.  Lizards speed up visual displays in noisy motion habitats , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[47]  R. Cocroft,et al.  The Behavioral Ecology of Insect Vibrational Communication , 2005 .

[48]  H. Slabbekoorn,et al.  HABITAT-DEPENDENT SONG DIVERGENCE IN THE LITTLE GREENBUL: AN ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SELECTION PRESSURES ON ACOUSTIC SIGNALS , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[49]  Nancy Huntly,et al.  EFFECTS OF WIND ON THE BEHAVIOR AND CALL TRANSMISSION OF PIKAS (OCHOTONA PRINCEPS) , 2005 .

[50]  H. Slabbekoorn,et al.  Fluid dynamics: Vortex rings in a constant electric field , 2003, Nature.

[51]  W. Reichardt,et al.  Computational structure of a biological motion-detection system as revealed by local detector analysis in the fly's nervous system. , 1989, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.