Responsible Research and Innovation in Information and Communication Technology: Identifying and Engaging with the Ethical Implications of ICTs

The concept of “responsible (research and) innovation” (RRI) can refer to a number of separate but interlinked questions: who is responsible? what are they responsible for? why are they responsible? or what are the consequences of these responsibilities? are just some of the more obvious ones. This chapter will discuss some of the most pertinent of these questions with reference to information and communication technologies (ICT). It will do this by describing the context, background and findings of the European research project “Ethical Issues of Emerging ICT Applications” (ETICA) as well as the currently on-going UK research project on a “Framework for Responsible Research and Innovation in Information and Communication technology” (FRRIICT). The chapter will start with a brief discussion of concepts of responsibility and responsible innovation that will allow the identification of important aspects that a responsible approach to ICT will require. It will then build a FRRIICT by discussing two different approaches to RRI, as represented by the two projects. This will lead to a

[1]  Fariba Sadri,et al.  Ambient intelligence: A survey , 2011, CSUR.

[2]  Bernd Carsten Stahl,et al.  Teaching Ethical Reflexivity in Information Systems: How to Equip Students to Deal with Moral and Ethical Issues of Emerging Information And Communication Technologies , 2011, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..

[3]  Patricia H. Werhane,et al.  Persons, rights, and corporations , 1985 .

[4]  Jane Calvert,et al.  What’s Special about Basic Research? , 2006 .

[5]  S. Humphreys.  Navigating the dataverse: privacy, technology, human rights , 2011 .

[6]  Luciano Floridi,et al.  On the Morality of Artificial Agents , 2004, Minds and Machines.

[7]  G. Lăzăroiu.  The Cambridge Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics , 2012 .

[8]  David Wright,et al.  A framework for the ethical impact assessment of information technology , 2011, Ethics and Information Technology.

[9]  Kurt Bayertz,et al.  Verantwortung : Prinzip oder Problem? , 1995 .

[10]  Richard Owen,et al.  Responsible Innovation: A Pilot Study with the U.K. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[11]  Nees Jan van Eck,et al.  Bibliometric mapping of computer and information ethics , 2011, Ethics and Information Technology.

[12]  Nick Bostrom,et al.  Cognitive Enhancement : Methods , Ethics , Regulatory Challenges ( 2006 ) , 2006 .

[13]  G. Rowe,et al.  Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation , 2000 .

[14]  C. Allen,et al.  Artificial Morality: Top-down, Bottom-up, and Hybrid Approaches , 2005, Ethics and Information Technology.

[15]  World Medical Association (WMA),et al.  Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects , 2009, Journal of the Indian Medical Association.

[16]  K. Cuhls.  From forecasting to foresight processes—new participative foresight activities in Germany , 2003 .

[17]  Bernd Carsten Stahl,et al.  IT for a better future: how to integrate ethics, politics and innovation , 2011, J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc..

[18]  C. Mitcham,et al.  Midstream Modulation of Technology: Governance From Within , 2006 .

[19]  Neil F. Doherty,et al.  A re-conceptualization of the interpretive flexibility of information technologies: redressing the balance between the social and the technical , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[20]  R. V. Schomberg.  Towards Responsible Research and Innovation in the Information and Communication Technologies and Security Technologies Fields , 2011 .

[21]  三嶋 博之.  The theory of affordances , 2008 .

[22]  Christiane,et al.  World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. , 2004, Journal international de bioethique = International journal of bioethics.

[23]  K. Himma.  The Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics , 2007 .

[24]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Affordance, conventions, and design , 1999, INTR.

[25]  W. Kissick,et al.  ON THE HUMAN USE OF HUMAN BEINGS , 1969, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Mark Coeckelbergh,et al.  Human development or human enhancement? A methodological reflection on capabilities and the evaluation of information technologies , 2011, Ethics and Information Technology.

[27]  Bernd Carsten Stahl,et al.  Responsible Management of Information Systems , 2003 .