Improved Localizadon of Cortical Activity by Combining EEG and MEG with MRI Cortical Surface Reconstruction: A Linear Approach

We describe a comprehensive linear approach to the problem of imaging brain activity with high temporal as well as spatial resolution based on combining EEG and MEG data with anatomical constraints derived from MRI images. The "inverse problem" of estimating the distribution of dipole strengths over the cortical surface is highly underdetermined, even given closely spaced EEG and MEG recordings. We have obtained much better solutions to this problem by explicitly incorporating both local cortical orientation as well as spatial covariance of sources and sensors into our formulation. An explicit polygonal model of the cortical manifold is first constructed as follows: (1) slice data in three orthogonal planes of section (needle-shaped voxels) are combined with a linear deblurring technique to make a single high-resolution 3-D image (cubic voxels), (2) the image is recursively flood-filled to determine the topology of the gray-white matter border, and (3) the resulting continuous surface is refined by relaxing it against the original 3-D gray-scale image using a deformable template method, which is also used to computationally flatten the cortex for easier viewing. The explicit solution to an error minimization formulation of an optimal inverse linear operator (for a particular cortical manifold, sensor placement, noise and prior source covariance) gives rise to a compact expression that is practically computable for hundreds of sensors and thousands of sources. The inverse solution can then be weighted for a particular (averaged) event using the sensor covariance for that event. Model studies suggest that we may be able to localize multiple cortical sources with spatial resolution as good as PET with this technique, while retaining a much finer grained picture of activity over time.

[1]  H. Kenner Geodesic Math and How to Use It , 1976 .

[2]  B. Neil Cuffin,et al.  Magnetic Fields of a Dipole in Special Volume Conductor Shapes , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  A. N. Tikhonov,et al.  Solutions of ill-posed problems , 1977 .

[4]  J. P. Ary,et al.  Location of Sources of Evoked Scalp Potentials: Corrections for Skull and Scalp Thicknesses , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  T E Conturo,et al.  AUR Memorial Award. Two computer models for selection of optimal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) pulse sequence timing. , 1984, Investigative radiology.

[6]  C C Wood,et al.  Electrical sources in human somatosensory cortex: identification by combined magnetic and potential recordings. , 1985, Science.

[7]  F. H. Lopes da Silva,et al.  On the magnetic field distribution generated by a dipolar current source situated in a realistically shaped compartment model of the head. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  U. Mitzdorf Properties of the evoked potential generators: current source-density analysis of visually evoked potentials in the cat cortex. , 1987, The International journal of neuroscience.

[9]  H Spekreijse,et al.  Topography and homogeneity of monkey VI studied through subdurally recorded pattern-evoked potentials , 1989, Visual Neuroscience.

[10]  R. Hari,et al.  Recording and interpretation of cerebral magnetic fields. , 1989, Science.

[11]  Michael S. Gazzaniga,et al.  Brainprints: Computer-Generated Two-Dimensional Maps of the Human Cerebral Cortex in vivo , 1989, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  G. C. Levy,et al.  Characterization of normal brain tissue using seven calculated MRI parameters and a statistical analysis system , 1989, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  D. Barth,et al.  Three-dimensional analysis of auditory-evoked potentials in rat neocortex. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  W E Smith,et al.  Linear estimation theory applied to the reconstruction of a 3-D vector current distribution. , 1990, Applied optics.

[15]  M Hoke,et al.  Identification of sources of brain neuronal activity with high spatiotemporal resolution through combination of neuromagnetic source localization (NMSL) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[16]  G. Carman Mappings of the cerebral cortex , 1990 .

[17]  M. Scherg Fundamentals if dipole source potential analysis , 1990 .

[18]  A. Ioannides,et al.  Continuous probabilistic solutions to the biomagnetic inverse problem , 1990 .

[19]  S J Luck,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for parallel and serial processing during visual search , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  Martin I. Sereno,et al.  Cortical visual areas in mammals , 1991 .

[21]  M. Garrett,et al.  Syntactically Based Sentence Processing Classes: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  P. S. Lewis,et al.  Anatomical constraints for neuromagnetic source models , 1991, Medical Imaging.

[23]  B. Rosen,et al.  Functional mapping of the human visual cortex by magnetic resonance imaging. , 1991, Science.

[24]  Mi Sereno,et al.  Cognitive Science Society. , 2022 .

[25]  R B Buxton,et al.  Target‐point combination of MR images , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  M. Kutas,et al.  Influences of semantic and syntactic context on open- and closed-class words , 1991, Memory & cognition.

[27]  J.C. Mosher,et al.  Multiple dipole modeling and localization from spatio-temporal MEG data , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[28]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  Eric L. Schwartz,et al.  Computer-aided neuroanatomy of macaque visual cortex , 1993 .