Sexual dimorphism using elliptical Fourier analysis: shape differences in the craniofacial complex

The assessment of sexual dimorphism plays an essential role in numerous disciplines such as: (1) forensics, with its concern with skeletal identification, including sexing; (2) archeology, where the sexing of skeletal materials is an essential aspect; (3) primatology, where sex differences are diverse; (4) paleoanthropology, where the identification of sex can influence taxonomic and phylogenetic decisions, and (5) growth and development, where one strives to identify differences before and after puberty. Other disciplines where sexual dimorphism plays an important function include orthodontics, gerontology, nutrition, and medicine. Quantitative studies of morphological forms in general, and sexual dimorphism in particular, is not a trivial endeavor in that at least two aspects are involved, namely size and shape. Focusing on the human skeletal system, sexual dimorphism affects all bones, including the cranium, pelvis, long bones, and vertebral column. However, the overwhelming numbers of studies of sexual dimorphism are based solely on size differences. These studies have repeatedly demonstrated that males are larger for most dimensions. The question of shape differences, if indeed present, cannot be readily inferred from these studies. Consequently, a number of studies were initiated, over some 20 years duration, that specifically focused on the presence of sexually dimorphic shape changes in the skeletal craniofacial complex. The following anatomical structures were examined: (1) the human nasal bones, (2) the primate cranial base, (3) the human cranial base, (4) the human dental arch, (5) the human mandibular arch, and (6) the human cranial vault. These six datasets involved 16 samples for a total of 1110 specimens. Every dataset generated statistically significant sexually dimorphic differences in shape. Thus, it is apparent that the craniofacial complex not only exhibits size differences but also specific shape differences.

[1]  W S Hunter,et al.  Disproportionate sexual dimorphism in the human face. , 1972, American journal of physical anthropology.

[2]  W. M. Krogman The human skeleton in forensic medicine. I. , 1963, Postgraduate medicine.

[3]  Mineo Yoshino,et al.  Sexual dimorphism in modern Japanese crania , 1995, American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council.

[4]  P. B. Eveleth,et al.  Population Differences in Growth: Environmental and Genetic Factors , 1979 .

[5]  A. K. Laird Evolution of the human growth curve. , 1967, Growth.

[6]  C. Worthman Hormones, Sex, and Gender , 1995 .

[7]  R. Schiffer,et al.  INTRODUCTION , 1988, Neurology.

[8]  F. Bookstein A statistical method for biological shape comparisons. , 1984, Journal of theoretical biology.

[9]  J. Keen,et al.  A study of the differences between male and female skulls. , 1950, American journal of physical anthropology.

[10]  M. Schmittbuhl,et al.  Variations of the mandibular shape in extant hominoids: Generic, specific, and subspecific quantification using elliptical fourier analysis in lateral view. , 2007, American journal of physical anthropology.

[11]  R. Behrents,et al.  Sexual dimorphism in normal craniofacial growth. , 1993, The Angle orthodontist.

[12]  K. Yasui Method for analyzing outlines with an application to recent Japanese crania. , 1986, American journal of physical anthropology.

[13]  Sex discriminatory effectiveness using combinations of root lengths and crown diameters. , 1978, American journal of physical anthropology.

[14]  S Braun,et al.  The form of the human dental arch. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[15]  J. Scott,et al.  The Shape of the Dental Arches , 1957, Journal of dental research.

[16]  Charles R. Giardina,et al.  Elliptic Fourier features of a closed contour , 1982, Comput. Graph. Image Process..

[17]  Dwight W. Read,et al.  Comment on Uses of Homologous-point Measures in Systematics: a Reply to Bookstein Et Al. , 1986 .

[18]  S. Richmond,et al.  An Assessment of the Fit of a Parabolic Curve to Pre- and Post-Treatment Dental Arches , 1989, British journal of orthodontics.

[19]  T W Phenice,et al.  A newly developed visual method of sexing the os pubis. , 1969, American journal of physical anthropology.

[20]  H. Blum Biological shape and visual science. I. , 1973, Journal of theoretical biology.

[21]  V. Ferrario,et al.  Fourier analysis of cephalometric shapes. , 1996, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[22]  Antonio Rosas,et al.  Thin-plate spline analysis of allometry and sexual dimorphism in the human craniofacial complex. , 2002, American journal of physical anthropology.

[23]  Sexual dimorphism in mandibular growth of French-Canadian children 6 to 10 years of age. , 1986, American journal of physical anthropology.

[24]  J. Napier,et al.  The Spread of Cancer , 1968, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[25]  M. H. Day,et al.  Sexual differentiation in the innominate bone studied by multivariate analysis. , 1975, Annals of human biology.

[26]  B. Solow,et al.  Sex differences in craniofacial morphology. , 1975, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[27]  F. Taroni,et al.  Sexual dimorphism of the human mandible: demonstration by elliptical Fourier analysis , 2001, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[28]  K M Weiss,et al.  On the systematic bias in skeletal sexing. , 1972, American journal of physical anthropology.

[29]  K. H. Lu An orthogonal analysis of the form, symmetry and asymmetry of the dental arch. , 1966, Archives of oral biology.

[30]  E. Begole A computer program for the analysis of dental arch form using the cubic spline function. , 1979, Computer programs in biomedicine.

[31]  G. Forbes Body composition in adolescence. , 1981, Progress in clinical and biological research.

[32]  S. Lele,et al.  Some comments on coordinate-free and scale-invariant methods in morphometrics. , 1991, American journal of physical anthropology.

[33]  V F Ferrario,et al.  Fourier analysis of human soft tissue facial shape: sex differences in normal adults. , 1995, Journal of anatomy.

[34]  W. Jungers,et al.  Elliptical fourier analysis of symphyseal shape in great ape mandibles. , 2000, Journal of human evolution.

[35]  S. Stinson Sex differences in environmental sensitivity during growth and development , 1985 .

[36]  P Kajanoja,et al.  Sex determination of Finnish crania by discriminant function analysis. , 1966, American journal of physical anthropology.

[37]  Lestrel Pe Some approaches toward the mathematical modeling of the craniofacial complex. , 1989 .

[38]  W. Brown SEX CHROMOSOMES AND THE LAW , 1962 .

[39]  M. Macconaill,et al.  The ideal form of the human dental arcade, with some prosthetic application. , 1949, The Dental record.

[40]  A. Roche,et al.  Cranial base shape variation with age: a longitudinal study of shape using Fourier analysis. , 1986, Human biology.

[41]  C. Luzi,et al.  Longitudinal Study Of Mandibular Growth Between Nine And Thirteen Years As A Basis For An Attempt Of Its Prediction , 2009 .

[42]  D. T. Lee,et al.  Medial Axis Transformation of a Planar Shape , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[43]  V. Ferrario,et al.  Elliptic Fourier analysis of mandibular shape. , 1996, Journal of craniofacial genetics and developmental biology.

[44]  P. O'higgins,et al.  determination of sex in south african blacks by discriminant function analysis of mandibular linear dimensions , 2006, Forensic science, medicine, and pathology.

[45]  P. Lestrel,et al.  Cranial vault shape in fossil hominids: Fourier descriptors in norma lateralis. , 2010, Homo : internationale Zeitschrift fur die vergleichende Forschung am Menschen.

[46]  W. H. Coleman,et al.  Sex differences in the growth of the human bony pelvis. , 1969, American journal of physical anthropology.

[47]  R. Holloway,,et al.  Sexual dimorphism in the human corpus callosum. , 1982, Science.

[48]  W. Rice SEX CHROMOSOMES AND THE EVOLUTION OF SEXUAL DIMORPHISM , 1984, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[49]  C Del Favero,et al.  Shape of the human corpus callosum in childhood. Elliptic Fourier analysis on midsagittal magnetic resonance scans. , 1996, Investigative radiology.

[50]  F. Bookstein The line-skeleton , 1979 .

[51]  Pete E. Lestrel,et al.  Fourier Descriptors and their Applications in Biology , 2008 .

[52]  Pete E Lestrel,et al.  Morphometrics for the life sciences , 2000 .

[53]  R. Segebarth-Orban An evaluation of the sexual dimorphism of the human innominate bone , 1980 .

[54]  G. Armelagos,et al.  Sexual dimorphism and human evolution: An overview , 1980 .

[55]  C. Brace,et al.  Sexual dimorphism and human tooth size differences , 1980 .

[56]  D. Read From multivariate to qualitative measurement: Representation of shape , 1990 .

[57]  P D Sampson,et al.  Dental arch shape: a statistical analysis using conic sections. , 1981, American journal of orthodontics.

[58]  L. Twomey,et al.  Sexual dimorphism in human vertebral body shape. , 1984, Journal of anatomy.

[59]  M. Inoue Fourier analysis of the forehead shape of skull and sex determination by use of computer. , 1990, Forensic science international.

[60]  S. Coben,et al.  The integration of facial skeletal variants , 1955 .

[61]  E. Giles SEX DETERMINATION BY DISCRIMINANT FUNCTION ANALYSIS OF THE MANDIBLE. , 1964, American journal of physical anthropology.

[62]  P. Lestrel,et al.  A quantitative approach for measuring crowding in the dental arch: Fourier descriptors. , 2004, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[63]  Christopher B. Ruff,et al.  Variation in Human Body Size and Shape , 2002 .

[64]  F. E. Purifoy Endocrine-Environment Interaction in Human Variability , 1981 .

[65]  P E Lestrel Some approaches toward the mathematical modeling of the craniofacial complex. , 1989, Journal of craniofacial genetics and developmental biology.

[66]  O. Polašek,et al.  Sex determination in skeletal remains from the medieval Eastern Adriatic coast – discriminant function analysis of humeri , 2013, Croatian medical journal.

[67]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data. , 1998 .

[68]  D. Crews Biological Anthropology and Human Aging: Some Current Directions in Aging Research , 1993 .

[69]  E A BeGole,et al.  Application of the Cubic Spline Function in the Description of Dental Arch Form , 1980, Journal of dental research.

[70]  C. Oxnard Sexual dimorphisms in the overall proportions of primates , 1983, American journal of primatology.

[71]  Kathryn T. Spoehr,et al.  Visual Information Processing , 1982 .

[72]  S. Mieke,et al.  Mandibular ramus flexure in an Indonesian population. , 1998, American journal of physical anthropology.

[73]  J H Currier,et al.  A computerized geometric analysis of human dental arch form. , 1969, American journal of orthodontics.

[74]  C. Brace,et al.  Use of Crown Areas in Odontometric Analyses , 1977, Journal of dental research.

[75]  R. Webber,et al.  Angular invariants in developing human mandibles. , 1979, Science.

[76]  J. Haas,et al.  Nutritional Anthropology and Biological Adaptation , 1977 .

[77]  L. Malcolm Protein-Energy Malnutrition and Growth , 1979 .

[78]  E. Giles,et al.  Statistical techniques for sex and race determination. Some comments in defense. , 1966, American journal of physical anthropology.

[79]  P. J. Mayer,et al.  Physical anthropological approaches to aging , 1982 .

[80]  M. Moss,et al.  Analysis of developmental processes possibly related to human dental sexual dimorphism in permanent and deciduous canines. , 1977, American journal of physical anthropology.

[81]  Roberto M. Cesar,et al.  A Fourier-wavelet representation of 2-D shapes : sexual dimorphism in the Japanese cranial base , 2004 .

[82]  M. Robinow Clinical applications of physical anthropology , 1982 .

[83]  H. Evans HUMAN GROWTH VOL. 2: POSTNATAL GROWTH , 1979 .

[84]  H. Seidler Sex-diagnosis of isolated Os coxae by discriminant functions , 1980 .

[85]  H. Israel The Fundamentals of Cranial and Facial Growth , 1978 .

[86]  Statistical analysis of arch shape with conic sections. , 1983, Biometrics.

[87]  A. Falsetti,et al.  Forensic anthropology , 2013 .

[88]  P. Herren,et al.  Arch shape and space balance determined by arcogramme technique. , 1973, Transactions. European Orthodontic Society.

[89]  E Kanazawa,et al.  Sexual dimorphism in the Japanese cranial base: a Fourier-wavelet representation. , 2005, American journal of physical anthropology.

[90]  Thomas Wynn,et al.  Evolution of sex differences in spatial cognition , 1996 .

[91]  Robert L. Wainwright,et al.  Sex Discriminatory Effectiveness Using Combinations of Permanent Teeth , 1977, Journal of dental research.

[92]  D. Franklin,et al.  Sexual dimorphism and discriminant function sexing in indigenous South African crania. , 2005, Homo : internationale Zeitschrift fur die vergleichende Forschung am Menschen.

[93]  C. Hill Technical note: evaluating mandibular ramus flexure as a morphological indicator of sex. , 2000, American journal of physical anthropology.

[94]  M Henneberg,et al.  Mandibular ramus flexure: a new morphologic indicator of sexual dimorphism in the human skeleton. , 1996, American journal of physical anthropology.

[95]  S. Lele,et al.  Euclidean distance matrix analysis: a coordinate-free approach for comparing biological shapes using landmark data. , 1991, American journal of physical anthropology.

[96]  P. Lestrel,et al.  Longitudinal study of cranial base shape changes in Macaca nemestrina. , 1993, American journal of physical anthropology.

[97]  J. Napier,et al.  A Handbook of Living Primates , 1969 .

[98]  K. Koski,et al.  Mandibular ramus flexure--indicator of sexual dimorphism? , 1996, American journal of physical anthropology.

[99]  F. Bookstein,et al.  The Measurement of Biological Shape and Shape Change. , 1980 .

[100]  P. Lestrel Method for analyzing complex two‐dimensional forms: Elliptical Fourier functions , 1989, American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council.

[101]  Pete E. Lestrel,et al.  Computational Shape Analysis: Based on a Fourier-Wavelet Representation of the Fossil Human Cranial Vault , 2011 .

[102]  D. Frayer Sexual dimorphism and cultural evolution in the Late Pleistocene and Holocene of Europe , 1980 .

[103]  Mehmet Yaşar İşcan,et al.  Rise of forensic anthropology , 1988 .

[104]  Scher Ea,et al.  The ideal form of the human dental arcade, with some prosthetic application. , 1949 .

[105]  M. Henneberg,et al.  Mandibular ramus flexure is a good indicator of sexual dimorphism. , 1998, American journal of physical anthropology.

[106]  V. Ferrario,et al.  Shape of the Human Corpus Callosum: Elliptic Fourier Analysis on Midsagittal Magnetic Resonance Scans , 1994, Investigative radiology.

[107]  E. L. Reynolds,et al.  Sex differences in the distribution of tissue components in the human leg from birth to maturity , 1948, The Anatomical record.

[108]  E. Giles,et al.  Sex determination by discriminant function analysis of crania. , 1963, American journal of physical anthropology.

[109]  S. Garn,et al.  Genetic Control of Sexual Dimorphism in Tooth Size , 1967, Journal of dental research.

[110]  V. Ferrario,et al.  Effect of growth and development on cephalometric shapes in orthodontic patients: a Fourier analysis. , 1997, European journal of orthodontics.

[111]  Sexual dimorphism in primate evolution. , 2001, American journal of physical anthropology.

[112]  D. Frayer SEXUAL DIMORPHISM , 2005 .

[113]  Joan T. Richtsmeier,et al.  Finite-Element Scaling Applied to Sexual Dimorphism in Rhesus Macaque (Macaca Mulatta) Facial Growth , 1986 .