Longer Prehospital Time Decreases Reliability of Vital Signs in the Field: A Dual Center Study

Background Field vital signs are integral in the American College of Surgeons (ASA) Committee on Trauma (COT) triage criteria for trauma team activation (TTA). Reliability of field vital signs in predicting first emergency department (ED) vital signs, however, may depend upon prehospital time. The study objective was to define the effect of prehospital time on correlation between field and first ED vital signs. Methods All highest level TTAs at two Level I trauma centers (2008-2018) were screened. Exclusions were unrecorded prehospital vital signs and those dead on arrival. Demographics, prehospital time (scene time + transport time), injury data, and vital signs were collected. Differences between field and first ED vitals were determined using the paired Student’s t test. Propensity score analysis, adjusting for age, sex, injury severity score (ISS), and mechanism of injury compared outcomes among patients with ISS ≥16. Multivariate linear regression determined impact of prehospital time on vital sign differences between field and ED among propensity-matched patients. Results After exclusions, 21 499 patients remained. Mean prehospital time was 32 vs. 41 minutes (P < .001). On propensity score analysis, longer prehospital time was associated with significantly greater differences in systolic blood pressure (SBP) (P < .001), pulse pressure (PP) (P = .003), and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) (P < .001). On multivariate analysis, linear regression that demonstrated longer prehospital time was associated with greater differences in SBP, heart rate (HR), and PP (P < .001). Conclusions Field vital signs are less likely to reflect initial ED vital signs when prehospital times are longer. Given the reliance of trauma triage criteria on prehospital vital signs, medical providers must be cognizant of this pitfall during the prehospital assessment of trauma patients.

[1]  K. Inaba,et al.  Prehospital Vital Signs Accurately Predict Initial Emergency Department Vital Signs , 2020, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine.

[2]  K. Inaba,et al.  Delta Shock Index in the Emergency Department Predicts Mortality and Need for Blood Transfusion in Trauma Patients , 2017, The American surgeon.

[3]  P. Rhee,et al.  Revitalizing Vital Signs: The Role of Delta Shock Index , 2016, Shock.

[4]  R. Ivers,et al.  Level of agreement between prehospital and emergency department vital signs in trauma patients , 2013, Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA.

[5]  O. Bouamra,et al.  The value of the difference between ED and prehospital vital signs in predicting outcome in trauma , 2013, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[6]  Jaques Reifman,et al.  Exploration of Prehospital Vital Sign Trends for the Prediction of Trauma Outcomes , 2009, Prehospital emergency care : official journal of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the National Association of State EMS Directors.