Development of an amperometric sulfite biosensor based on sulfite oxidase with cytochrome c, as electron acceptor, and a screen-printed transducer

An amperometric biosensor for sulfite has been developed. The enzyme sulfite oxidase (SOD) and electron acceptor cytochrome c are mixed into the carbon ink that is deposited onto the working electrode of a screen-printed strip. A silver–silver chloride electrode is printed alongside the working electrode and serves as reference/counter electrode. The electrochemical behaviour of the biosensor surface in plain buffer has been investigated by cyclic voltammetry. In the voltage range −0.5 to +0.5 V, a well-defined anodic peak appeared at −0.15 V and a less well-defined anodic peak at about +0.2 V. In the presence of SO32−, the cyclic voltammogram obtained with the biosensor exhibited an increase in magnitude of the more positive peak; this was considered to result from the electrocatalytic oxidation of SO32− involving SOD and the heme (Fe2+/Fe3+) centre of cytochrome c. Amperometry in stirred solution was used to construct a hydrodynamic voltammogram for SO32− using the biosensor; this exhibited a single wave with a plateau beginning at +0.3 V. This wave corresponds to the electrocatalytic response observed by cyclic voltammetry. The pH and concentration of buffer components have been optimised for the determination of SO32− by amperometry in stirred solution. Using these conditions, a detection limit of 4 ppm was obtained. The stability of the biosensors was examined after storage in 0.05 M phosphate buffer pH 7.4 at 4°C; it was found that the initial response was retained for at least 45 days. The proposed biosensors were evaluated on samples of unspiked and spiked estuarine, river and tap waters. The recovery and precision data indicated that the devices could be expected to give reliable data in these waters.

[1]  A. Bond,et al.  A microscopic model of electron transfer at electroactive sites of molecular dimensions for reduction of cytochrome c at basal- and edge-plane graphite electrodes , 1989 .

[2]  F. Armstrong,et al.  Direct electrochemistry of redox proteins , 1988 .

[3]  John P. Hart,et al.  Chemically modified, screen-printed carbon electrodes , 1992 .

[4]  R. Compton,et al.  Voltammetry in the Presence of Ultrasound: Sonovoltammetric Detection of Cytochrome c under Very Fast Mass Transport Conditions , 1996 .

[5]  F. Armstrong,et al.  Reactions of electron-transfer proteins at electrodes , 1985, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[6]  Yutaka Osajima,et al.  Determination of Sulfite in White Wine by Amperometric Flow Injection Analysis with an Immobilized Sulfite Oxidase Reactor , 1989 .

[7]  Vicki J. Smith,et al.  Determination of sulfite using a sulfite oxidase enzyme electrode , 1987 .

[8]  Liang-Hong Guo,et al.  Direct electrochemistry of proteins and enzymes , 1991 .

[9]  J. Švitel,et al.  Composite Biosensor for Sulfite Assay: Use of Water-Insoluble Hexacyanoferrate(III) Salts as Electron-Transfer Mediators , 1998 .

[10]  Gordon G. Wallace,et al.  Polypyrrole-based amperometric biosensor for sulfite determination , 1994 .

[11]  H. O. Beutler A new enzymatic method for determination of sulphite in food , 1984 .

[12]  M. Cascante,et al.  A sensitive enzymatic method of sulfite determination , 1990 .

[13]  R. Simon,et al.  Sensitivity to ingested metabisulfites in asthmatic subjects. , 1981, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.