A PCA–DEA approach to measure the quality of life in Estonian counties

This paper investigates the application of a PCA–DEA model to assess the quality of life (QOL) scores in Estonian counties and analyses the model's results. The dataset is a balanced panel of 15 Estonian counties covering the period from 2000 to 2011. We consider a PCA–DEA model as an alternative method to estimate and predict QOL scores and rankings of Estonian counties. The method consists of a two-stage analysis that begins with a principal component analysis. In the second stage, the standard DEA is used. The results from the conventional DEA model and the PCA–DEA model are compared and discussed. A comparison of the methodologies demonstrates that a PCA–DEA model provides a powerful tool for performance ranking. The rankings of Estonian counties using QOL scores for different model specifications are presented. Finally, the QOL ranking of Estonian counties is revised using PCA–DEA.

[1]  B. W. Ang,et al.  A mathematical programming approach to constructing composite indicators , 2007 .

[2]  António Afonso,et al.  Assessing and explaining the relative efficiency of local government , 2008 .

[3]  Alexander Cotte Poveda Economic development and growth in Colombia: An empirical analysis with super-efficiency DEA and panel data models , 2011 .

[4]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  Eduardo González,et al.  The Importance of the Geographic Level of Analysis in the Assessment of the Quality of Life: The Case of Spain , 2011 .

[6]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Multidimensional quality-of-life measure with an application to Fortune's best cities , 2001 .

[7]  Nicole Adler,et al.  Improving discrimination in data envelopment analysis: PCA-DEA or variable reduction , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  P. Schaeffer,et al.  Valuing Community Attributes in Rural Counties of West Virginia Using Data Envelopment Analysis , 2011 .

[9]  P. Murias,et al.  An Economic Wellbeing Index for the Spanish Provinces: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach , 2006 .

[10]  F Pedraja-Chaparro,et al.  On the quality of the data envelopment analysis model , 1999, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[11]  Silvia Liverani R: A programming environment for Data Analysis and Graphics , 2008 .

[12]  Antonio Jurado,et al.  Construction and Evolution of a Multidimensional Well-Being Index for the Spanish Regions , 2012 .

[13]  W. Cooper,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software , 1999 .

[14]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide , 2005 .

[15]  Dimitris K. Despotis,et al.  Improving the discriminating power of DEA: focus on globally efficient units , 2002, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[16]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Weighting and Aggregation in Composite Indicator Construction: a Multiplicative Optimization Approach , 2010 .

[17]  Greg N. Gregoriou,et al.  Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking: Data Envelopment Analysis with Spreadsheets , 2008, The Journal of Wealth Management.

[18]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Data envelopment analysis vs. principal component analysis: An illustrative study of economic performance of Chinese cities , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  Rolf Färe,et al.  An Economic Approach to Achievement and Improvement Indexes , 2001 .

[20]  Cira Mendoza,et al.  A DEA Approach to Measure the Quality-of-Life in the Municipalities of the Canary Islands , 2013 .

[21]  Boaz Golany,et al.  Evaluation of deregulated airline networks using data envelopment analysis combined with principal component analysis with an application to Western Europe , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[22]  Akihiro Hashimoto,et al.  Has Livability of Japan Gotten Better for 1956–1990?: a Dea Approach , 1997 .

[23]  Daniel Tyteca,et al.  Towards indicators of sustainable development for firms: A productive efficiency perspective , 1999 .

[24]  Boaz Golany,et al.  Including principal component weights to improve discrimination in data envelopment analysis , 2002, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[25]  Mónica Domínguez-Serrano,et al.  A Gender Wellbeing Composite Indicator: The Best-Worst Global Evaluation Approach , 2011 .

[26]  P. Bogetoft,et al.  Benchmarking with DEA, SFA, and R , 2011 .

[27]  Zilla Sinuany-Stern,et al.  Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  Timothy Coelli,et al.  An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis , 1997 .