A Pilot Study on the Feasibility of Robot-Aided Leg Motor Training to Facilitate Active Participation

Robot-aided gait therapy offers a promising approach towards improving gait function in individuals with neurological disorders such as stroke or spinal cord injury. However, incorporation of appropriate control strategies is essential for actively engaging the patient in the therapeutic process. Although several control algorithms (such as assist-as-needed and error augmentation) have been proposed to improve active patient participation, we hypothesize that the therapeutic benefits of these control algorithms can be greatly enhanced if combined with a motor learning task to facilitate neural reorganization and motor recovery. Here, we describe an active robotic training approach (patient-cooperative robotic gait training combined with a motor learning task) using the Lokomat and pilot-tested whether this approach can enhance active patient participation during training. Six neurologically intact adults and three chronic stroke survivors participated in this pilot feasibility study. Participants walked in a Lokomat while simultaneously performing a foot target-tracking task that necessitated greater hip and knee flexion during the swing phase of the gait. We computed the changes in tracking error as a measure of motor performance and changes in muscle activation as a measure of active subject participation. Repeated practice of the motor-learning task resulted in significant reductions in target-tracking error in all subjects. Muscle activation was also significantly higher during active robotic training compared to simply walking in the robot. The data from stroke participants also showed a trend similar to neurologically intact participants. These findings provide a proof-of-concept demonstration that combining robotic gait training with a motor learning task enhances active participation.

[1]  P. Celnik,et al.  Stroke Rehabilitation. , 2015, Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America.

[2]  Glenn N. Williams,et al.  Error associated with antagonist muscle activity in isometric knee strength testing , 2010, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[3]  T. Demott,et al.  Enhanced Gait-Related Improvements After Therapist- Versus Robotic-Assisted Locomotor Training in Subjects With Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Study , 2008, Stroke.

[4]  Robot assisted gait training with active leg exoskeleton (ALEX) , 2009, 2008 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics.

[5]  V. Dietz,et al.  Treadmill training of paraplegic patients using a robotic orthosis. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[6]  Monica A. Perez,et al.  Motor skill training induces changes in the excitability of the leg cortical area in healthy humans , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  J. Krakauer Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. , 2006, Current opinion in neurology.

[8]  Steven C Cramer,et al.  Cortical Plasticity Following Motor Skill Learning During Mental Practice in Stroke , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[9]  William Z Rymer,et al.  Reducing robotic guidance during robot-assisted gait training improves gait function: a case report on a stroke survivor. , 2013, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[10]  G. Sandini,et al.  Robot therapy of the upper limb in stroke patients: preliminary experiences for the principle-based use of this technology. , 2009, Functional neurology.

[11]  Giulio Sandini,et al.  Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation Performance Adaptive Training Control Strategy for Recovering Wrist Movements in Stroke Patients: a Preliminary, Feasibility Study , 2009 .

[12]  A. Patla,et al.  Visual control of locomotion: strategies for changing direction and for going over obstacles. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  J. Fung,et al.  Effects of robot-assisted therapy on stroke rehabilitation in upper limbs: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. , 2012, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[14]  J. Perry,et al.  Computer algorithms to characterize individual subject EMG profiles during gait. , 1992, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[15]  W. Darling,et al.  Jump Landing Strategies in Male and Female College Athletes and the Implications of Such Strategies for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury , 2003, The American journal of sports medicine.

[16]  D. Ostry,et al.  Muscle cocontraction following dynamics learning , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  F. Pierelli,et al.  Psychophysiological aspects of voluntary skilled movement after stroke: a follow-up study. , 2008, Archives italiennes de biologie.

[18]  M. Lewek,et al.  Allowing Intralimb Kinematic Variability During Locomotor Training Poststroke Improves Kinematic Consistency: A Subgroup Analysis From a Randomized Clinical Trial , 2009, Physical Therapy.

[19]  Robert Riener,et al.  Generalized elasticities improve patient-cooperative control of rehabilitation robots , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[20]  Hannah J. Block,et al.  Interlimb coordination during locomotion: what can be adapted and stored? , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  P. Morasso,et al.  Robot therapy for stroke survivors: proprioceptive training and regulation of assistance. , 2009, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[22]  I. Schwartz,et al.  The Effectiveness of Locomotor Therapy Using Robotic‐Assisted Gait Training in Subacute Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2009, PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation.

[23]  G. Schlaug,et al.  Brain Structures Differ between Musicians and Non-Musicians , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  Elizabeth A. Brackbill,et al.  Robot-assisted modifications of gait in healthy individuals , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  Paul L Gribble,et al.  Role of cocontraction in arm movement accuracy. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Motor learning principles for neurorehabilitation. , 2013, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[27]  R. Riener,et al.  Path Control: A Method for Patient-Cooperative Robot-Aided Gait Rehabilitation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[28]  P. Marshall,et al.  Motor Control of the Knee as a Function of Age and Range of Motion , 2009, Experimental aging research.

[29]  C. Simpkins,et al.  Neuroscience for Clinicians , 2013 .

[30]  N. Hogan,et al.  Learning, Not Adaptation, Characterizes Stroke Motor Recovery: Evidence From Kinematic Changes Induced by Robot-Assisted Therapy in Trained and Untrained Task in the Same Workspace , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[31]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Stroke rehabilitation , 2011, The Lancet.

[32]  S. Larson,et al.  Telemetered electromyography of peroneus longus in Varecia variegata and Eulemur rubriventer: implications for the functional significance of a large peroneal process. , 2007, Journal of human evolution.

[33]  D. Reisman,et al.  Split-Belt Treadmill Adaptation Transfers to Overground Walking in Persons Poststroke , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[34]  A. Mayr,et al.  Prospective, Blinded, Randomized Crossover Study of Gait Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients Using the Lokomat Gait Orthosis , 2007, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[35]  Lutz Jäncke,et al.  Structural neuroplasticity in the sensorimotor network of professional female ballet dancers , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[36]  賢二 鈴木 慢性副鼻腔炎に対するrandomized controlled study , 2002 .

[37]  R. Dickstein Rehabilitation of gait speed after stroke: a critical review of intervention approaches. , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[38]  Sunil K Agrawal,et al.  Effect of robotic performance-based error-augmentation versus error-reduction training on the gait of healthy individuals. , 2013, Gait & posture.

[39]  Sunil K. Agrawal,et al.  Gait Training After Stroke: A Pilot Study Combining a Gravity-Balanced Orthosis, Functional Electrical Stimulation, and Visual Feedback , 2008, Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT.

[40]  Glenn N. Williams,et al.  Quantification method affects estimates of voluntary quadriceps activation , 2010, Muscle & nerve.

[41]  Kelly P Westlake,et al.  Pilot study of Lokomat versus manual-assisted treadmill training for locomotor recovery post-stroke , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[42]  Chandramouli Krishnan,et al.  Variability in antagonist muscle activity and peak torque during isometric knee strength testing. , 2009, The Iowa orthopaedic journal.

[43]  James M. Finley,et al.  Learning to be economical: the energy cost of walking tracks motor adaptation , 2013, The Journal of physiology.

[44]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Control of foot trajectory in human locomotion: role of ground contact forces in simulated reduced gravity. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  R. Nudo,et al.  Effects of Repetitive Motor Training on Movement Representations in Adult Squirrel Monkeys: Role of Use versus Learning , 2000, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[46]  L. Boyd,et al.  Sleep Enhances Off-line Spatial and Temporal Motor Learning After Stroke , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[47]  Rajiv Ranganathan,et al.  Extracting synergies in gait: using EMG variability to evaluate control strategies. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[48]  D G Altman,et al.  Statistics Notes: Detecting skewness from summary information , 1996, BMJ.

[49]  F. Müller,et al.  Effects of Locomotion Training With Assistance of a Robot-Driven Gait Orthosis in Hemiparetic Patients After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study , 2007, Stroke.

[50]  J. Hidler,et al.  Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Lokomat in Subacute Stroke , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[51]  Lutz Jäncke,et al.  Training-Induced Neural Plasticity in Golf Novices , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[52]  D. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[53]  Anindo Roy,et al.  Short-term ankle motor performance with ankle robotics training in chronic hemiparetic stroke. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[54]  Rajiv Ranganathan,et al.  Active robotic training improves locomotor function in a stroke survivor , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[55]  Noritaka Kawashima,et al.  Limited Transfer of Newly Acquired Movement Patterns across Walking and Running in Humans , 2012, PloS one.

[56]  Robert Riener,et al.  Patient-cooperative control increases active participation of individuals with SCI during robot-aided gait training , 2010, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[57]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Robotic Therapy: The Tipping Point , 2012, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[58]  Catherine R Kinnaird,et al.  Kinematic, Muscular, and Metabolic Responses During Exoskeletal-, Elliptical-, or Therapist-Assisted Stepping in People With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury , 2012, Physical Therapy.

[59]  Lutz Jäncke,et al.  The Architecture of the Golfer's Brain , 2009, PloS one.