Does a waist-worn accelerometer capture intra- and inter-person variation in walking behavior among persons with multiple sclerosis?

The valid application of accelerometry and interpretation of its output (i.e., counts per unit time) for the measurement of walking behavior in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) rests upon multiple untested assumptions. This study tested the assumption that a waist-worn accelerometer should capture the intra- and inter-person variation in walking behavior. Twenty-four participants with a neurologist-confirmed diagnosis of MS and who were ambulatory with minimal assistance undertook three 6-min periods of over-ground walking that involved comfortable (CWS) and then slower (SWS) and faster (FWS) walking speeds while wearing ActiGraph, model 7164, accelerometers around the waist and ankle. The experimental manipulation of walking was successful such that the CWS was 76.7±13.0m/min (range=55.6-105.14), whereas the SWS and FWS were 64.3±12.3m/min (range=44.5-90.1) and 89.1±13.8m/min (range=60.9-116.4), respectively. Movement counts from the waist and ankle-worn accelerometer were strongly associated with the manipulation of speed, but the association was stronger for the waist than ankle based on both eta-squared estimates (η(2) values=.78 and .46) and the average squared multiple correlations from individual regression analyses (R(2) values=.97±.04 and .88±.21). The bivariate correlation between movement counts from the waist-worn accelerometer and speed of walking (r=.823, p=.001) was large in magnitude and significantly different (z=3.22, p=.001) from that between movement counts from the ankle-worn unit and walking speed (r=.549, p=.001). This study provides novel evidence that an accelerometer worn around the waist captures intra- and inter-person variation in over-ground walking behavior in those with MS.

[1]  C. M. Wiles,et al.  Quantification of walking mobility in neurological disorders. , 2004, QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians.

[2]  Geert Alders,et al.  Predicting habitual walking performance in multiple sclerosis: relevance of capacity and self-report measures , 2010, Multiple sclerosis.

[3]  Jeffrey A. Cohen,et al.  Evaluation of the six-minute walk in multiple sclerosis subjects and healthy controls , 2008, Multiple sclerosis.

[4]  R. Motl,et al.  The effect of walking mobility on the measurement of physical activity using accelerometry in multiple sclerosis , 2009, Clinical rehabilitation.

[5]  Edward McAuley,et al.  Accelerometry in persons with multiple sclerosis: Measurement of physical activity or walking mobility? , 2010, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[6]  G. Cutter,et al.  Persistent pain and uncomfortable sensations in persons with multiple sclerosis , 2007, Pain.

[7]  B. Munro Statistical methods for health care research , 1986 .

[8]  J. Curnow,et al.  Technical reliability of the CSA activity monitor: The EarlyBird Study. , 2002, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[9]  R. Motl,et al.  Physical Activity Correlates With Neurological Impairment and Disability in Multiple Sclerosis , 2008, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[10]  R. Motl,et al.  Continued validation of the Symptom Inventory in multiple sclerosis , 2009, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[11]  R. Siegmund,et al.  Actigraphic Investigations On The Activity‐Rest Behavior Of Right‐ and Left‐Handed Students , 2006, Chronobiology international.

[12]  G. Mawston,et al.  Exploring actical accelerometers as an objective measure of physical activity in people with multiple sclerosis. , 2009, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[13]  Robert W. Motl,et al.  Confirmation and extension of the validity of the Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12 (MSWS-12) , 2008, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[14]  R. Motl,et al.  Possible clinical outcome measures for clinical trials in patients with multiple sclerosis , 2010, Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders.