Calcaneal Lengthening: Investigation of Deformity Correction in a Cadaver Flatfoot Model

Background: Evans showed that lengthening the lateral column by inserting structural bone graft into the anterior calcaneus could correct abduction and valgus deformity in flatfoot. To better understand the mechanism of correction and the three-dimensional effect of this procedure a cadaver study was done. Methods: Three cadaver flatfoot models were used. Computed tomographic (CT) scans were made of each specimen before and after lengthening. Data from these scans were used to determine the center of volume of the talus, navicular, cuboid, and calcaneus. The angular and translational motions for each bone were determined. Results: On average, relative to the talus, the navicular moved 18.6 degrees of rotation in adduction, 2.6 degrees of rotation in pronation, and 3.4 degrees in plantarflexion. The average translation was 5.6 mm medial, 0.4 mm posterior, and 1.8 mm plantar. The cuboid moved an average of 24.2 degrees of rotation in adduction and lengthening, 13.9 degrees in pronation, and 1.9 degrees in plantarflexion. The average translation was 9.4 mm medial, 2.6 mm distal, and 1.5 mm plantar. The calcaneus moved an average of 4.4 degrees of rotation in adduction, 0.1 degrees of rotation in eversion, and 1.3 degrees of plantarflexion. The average translation was 3 mm medial and 0.7 mm posterior with no plantar translation. Conclusions: The mechanism of Evans calcaneal lengthening involves adduction and plantarflexion of the midfoot relative to the hindfoot. The cuboid and navicular appear to move as a unit. The shape of the talar head, axis of the subtalar joint, degree of initial deformity, competence of plantar soft tissues, such as the long plantar ligament, and adequate length of the Achilles tendon are important. Knowing what qualitative three-dimensional changes take place allows a better understanding of the mechanics of the procedure and its possible applications.

[1]  J. Otis,et al.  Medial Arch Strain After Lateral Column Lengthening: An In Vitro Study , 1999, Foot & ankle international.

[2]  B. Sangeorzan,et al.  Two Reconstructive Techniques for Flatfoot Deformity Comparing Contact Characteristics of the Hindfoot Joints , 1998, Foot & ankle international.

[3]  G. Horton,et al.  Effect of Calcaneal Osteotomy and Lateral Column Lengthening on the Plantar Fascia: A Biomechanical Investigation , 1998, Foot & ankle international.

[4]  B. Sangeorzan,et al.  Alterations in Talar Morphology Associated with Adult Flatfoot , 1997, Foot & ankle international.

[5]  J F Baumhauer,et al.  Foot And Ankle Research Priority: Report from the Research Council of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society , 1997, Foot & ankle international.

[6]  J. Shaer,et al.  Calcaneocuboid Joint Pressures with Lateral Column Lengthening (Evans) Procedure , 1997, Foot & ankle international.

[7]  J T Deland,et al.  Pes Planus in Patients with Posterior Tibial Tendon Insufficiency: Asymptomatic Versus Symptomatic Foot , 1997, Foot & ankle international.

[8]  V. Mosca,et al.  Calcaneal lengthening for valgus deformity of the hindfoot. Results in children who had severe, symptomatic flatfoot and skewfoot. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  B. Sangeorzan,et al.  Effect of Calcaneal Lengthening on Relationships among the Hindfoot, Midfoot, and Forefoot* , 1993, Foot & ankle.

[10]  L. Staheli,et al.  The longitudinal arch. A survey of eight hundred and eighty-two feet in normal children and adults. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  D. Evans,et al.  Calcaneo-valgus deformity. , 1975, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[12]  Dillwyn Evans,et al.  RELAPSED CLUB FOOT , 1961 .

[13]  C. Saltzman,et al.  Surgery of the Foot and Ankle , 1993 .

[14]  R. Harris,et al.  Hypermobile flat-foot with short tendo achillis. , 1948, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.