One-third probability embedding: a new ±1 histogram compensating image least significant bit steganography scheme

A new method is introduced for the least significant bit (LSB) image steganography in spatial domain providing the capacity of one bit per pixel. Compared to the recently proposed image steganography techniques, the new method called one-third LSB embedding reduces the probability of change per pixel to one-third without sacrificing the embedding capacity. This improvement results in a better imperceptibility and also higher robustness against well-known LSB detectors. Bits of the message are carried using a function of three adjacent cover pixels. It is shown that no significant improvement is achieved by increasing the length of the pixel sequence employed. A closed-form expression for the probability of change per pixel in terms of the number of pixels used in the pixel groups has been derived. Another advantage of the proposed algorithm is to compensate, as much as possible, for any changes in the image histogram. It has been demonstrated that one-third probability embedding outperforms histogram compensating version of the LSB matching in terms of keeping the image histogram unchanged.

[1]  Wen-Hsiang Tsai,et al.  A steganographic method for images by pixel-value differencing , 2003, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[2]  Tieyong Zeng,et al.  A Generalization of LSB Matching , 2009, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[3]  Cheng-Hsing Yang,et al.  Inverted pattern approach to improve image quality of information hiding by LSB substitution , 2008, Pattern Recognit..

[4]  Jiwu Huang,et al.  Edge Adaptive Image Steganography Based on LSB Matching Revisited , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[5]  Andrew D. Ker Steganalysis of LSB matching in grayscale images , 2005, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[6]  Jessica J. Fridrich,et al.  Detecting LSB Steganography in Color and Gray-Scale Images , 2001, IEEE Multim..

[7]  Jessica J. Fridrich,et al.  Practical methods for minimizing embedding impact in steganography , 2007, Electronic Imaging.

[8]  Andrew D. Ker Improved Detection of LSB Steganography in Grayscale Images , 2004, Information Hiding.

[9]  Huan Xu,et al.  An improved section-wise exploiting modification direction method , 2010, Signal Process..

[10]  Bin Li,et al.  Attack LSB Matching Steganography by Counting Alteration Rate of the Number of Neighbourhood Gray Levels , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[11]  Tung-Shou Chen,et al.  A Minimal Euclidean Distance Searching Technique for Sudoku Steganography , 2008, 2008 International Symposium on Information Science and Engineering.

[12]  Lee-Ming Cheng,et al.  Hiding data in images by simple LSB substitution , 2004, Pattern Recognit..

[13]  Andreas Pfitzmann,et al.  Attacks on Steganographic Systems , 1999, Information Hiding.

[14]  Hany Farid,et al.  Detecting hidden messages using higher-order statistical models , 2002, Proceedings. International Conference on Image Processing.

[15]  Bin Li,et al.  Textural features based universal steganalysis , 2008, Electronic Imaging.

[16]  M. Hwang,et al.  Image steganographic scheme based on pixel-value differencing and LSB replacement methods , 2005 .

[17]  Yen-Ping Chu,et al.  A Novel Image Data Hiding Scheme with Diamond Encoding , 2009, EURASIP J. Inf. Secur..

[18]  Cheng-Hsing Yang,et al.  Anti-Forensics with Steganographic Data Embedding in Digital Images , 2011, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[19]  Tomás Pevný,et al.  Steganalysis by subtractive pixel adjacency matrix , 2010, IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur..

[20]  Hung-Min Sun,et al.  A LSB substitution compatible steganography , 2007, TENCON 2007 - 2007 IEEE Region 10 Conference.

[21]  Andreas Westfeld,et al.  F5-A Steganographic Algorithm , 2001, Information Hiding.

[22]  Shahrokh Ghaemmaghami,et al.  One-third probability embedding: Less detectable LSB steganography , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo.

[23]  Chin-Chen Chang,et al.  An improvement of EMD embedding method for large payloads by pixel segmentation strategy , 2008, Image Vis. Comput..

[24]  Bo Li,et al.  Preestimation-Based Array Interpolation Approach to Coherent Source Localization Using Multiple Sparse Subarrays , 2009, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[25]  Xinpeng Zhang,et al.  Vulnerability of pixel-value differencing steganography to histogram analysis and modification for enhanced security , 2004, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[26]  Ying Wang,et al.  Optimized Feature Extraction for Learning-Based Image Steganalysis , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[27]  Tieyong Zeng,et al.  Detecting LSB matching by applying calibration technique for difference image , 2008, MM&Sec '08.

[28]  Tung-Shou Chen,et al.  A Novel Data Embedding Method Using Adaptive Pixel Pair Matching , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[29]  Xinpeng Zhang,et al.  Efficient Steganographic Embedding by Exploiting Modification Direction , 2006, IEEE Communications Letters.

[30]  J. Mielikainen LSB matching revisited , 2006, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[31]  Jessica J. Fridrich,et al.  Matrix embedding for large payloads , 2006, IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur..

[32]  Markus G. Kuhn,et al.  Information hiding-a survey , 1999, Proc. IEEE.

[33]  Cheng-Hsing Yang,et al.  Adaptive Data Hiding in Edge Areas of Images With Spatial LSB Domain Systems , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[34]  William A. Pearlman,et al.  Steganalysis of additive-noise modelable information hiding , 2003, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.