A method for source apportionment in biomass/coal blends using thermogravimetric analysis

Abstract Coal/biomass blends are increasingly important in meeting targets for renewable energy utilisation. This paper presents the initial findings of a new thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) method for characterising biomass materials that can also be used to accurately predict biomass/coal blend compositions. The proposed TGA method uses a heating rate of 5 °C/min from ambient to 900 °C in nitrogen at a flow rate of 30 ml/min. The gas is then changed to air at 30 ml/min to burn off the fixed carbon and finally determine the ash content. Particle size (53–75, 106–150 and 150–212 μm) was found to have a limited effect on weight loss profile at these conditions. Four different biomass types, palm kernel expeller, cereal co-product, sawdust and olive cake were all blended with a typical UK high volatile coal in proportions of 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% (wt/wt% basis) with a particle size of 106–150 μm. The devolatilisation profiles of the blends appear to be strictly additive allowing blend proportions to be calculated using three different approaches. The mapping of component profiles onto actual profiles allows the biomass type and blend proportions to be accurately determined.

[1]  David A. Tillman,et al.  Biomass cofiring at Seward Station , 2000 .

[2]  Edward Lester,et al.  Determining the composition of binary coal blends using Bayes theorem , 2003 .

[3]  Enrico Biagini,et al.  Devolatilization rate of biomasses and coal–biomass blends: an experimental investigation , 2002 .

[4]  C. Roy,et al.  Optical and chemical characterization of solid residues obtained from vacuum pyrolysis of wood (aspen poplar) , 1986 .

[5]  Chatphol Meesri,et al.  Pyrolytic characteristics of blended coal and woody biomass , 2004 .

[6]  L. Baxter.  Biomass-coal co-combustion: opportunity for affordable renewable energy , 2005 .

[7]  John M. Sweeten,et al.  Co-firing of coal and cattle feedlot biomass (FB) fuels. Part II. Performance results from 30 kWt (100,000) BTU/h laboratory scale boiler burner☆ ☆ , 2003 .

[8]  Yusuf Sürmen,et al.  Cofiring of Biomass and Lignite Blends: Resource Facilities; Technological and Environmental Issues , 2003 .

[9]  D. Vamvuka,et al.  Devolatilization and Combustion Kinetics of Low-Rank Coal Blends from Dynamic Measurements , 2003 .

[10]  Panagiotis Grammelis,et al.  Kinetic Modeling of Coal/Agricultural By-Product Blends , 2003 .

[11]  Panagiotis Grammelis,et al.  Thermogravimetric studies of the behavior of lignite–biomass blends during devolatilization , 2002 .

[12]  Daren E. Daugaard,et al.  Enthalpy for Pyrolysis for Several Types of Biomass , 2003 .

[13]  Chatphol Meesri,et al.  Lack of synergetic effects in the pyrolytic characteristics of woody biomass/coal blends under low and high heating rate regimes , 2002 .

[14]  K. Kubica,et al.  Devolatilisation characteristics of coal and biomass blends , 2005 .

[15]  Margaret S. Wooldridge,et al.  Co-firing of coal and biomass fuel blends , 2001 .

[16]  Luis Puigjaner,et al.  Pyrolysis of blends of biomass with poor coals , 1996 .

[17]  Rafael Kandiyoti,et al.  Development of a Reactivity Test for Coal-Blend Combustion: The Laboratory-Scale Suspension-Firing Reactor , 2002 .

[18]  A. Davis.  Petrographic determination of the composition of binary coal blends , 2000 .

[19]  C. Blasi,et al.  Thermogravimetric Analysis and Devolatilization Kinetics of Wood , 2002 .

[20]  H. Vuthaluru.  Investigations into the pyrolytic behaviour of coal/biomass blends using thermogravimetric analysis. , 2004, Bioresource technology.