Foundations of Quantum Physics: A General Realistic and Operational Approach

We present a general formalism with the aim ofdescribing the situation of an entity, how it is, how itreacts to experiments, how we can make statistics withit, and how it ‘changes’ under the influence of the rest of the universe. Therefore we baseour formalism on the following basic notions: (1) thestates of the entity, which describe the modes of beingof the entity, (2) the experiments that can be performed on the entity, which describe how weact upon and collect knowledge about the entity, (3) theoutcomes of our experiments, which describe how theentity and the experiments "are" and “behave” together, (4) theprobabilities, which describe our repeated experimentsand the statistics of these repeated experiments, and(5) the symmetries, which describe the interactions ofthe entity with the external world without beingexperimented upon. Starting from these basic notions weformulate the necessary derived notions: mixed states,mixed experiments and events, an eigenclosure structure describing the properties of theentity, an orthoclosure structure introducing anorthocomplementation, outcome determination, experimentdetermination, state determination, and atomicity giving rise to some of the topological separationaxioms for the closures. We define the notion ofsubentity in a general way and identify the morphisms ofour structure. We study specific examples in detail in the light of this formalism: a classicaldeterministic entity and a quantum entity described bythe standard quantum mechanical formalism. We present apossible solution to the problem of the description of subentities within the standard quantummechanical procedure using the tensor product of theHilbert spaces, by introducing a new completed quantummechanics in Hilbert space, were new ‘pure’states are introduced, not represented by rays of theHilbert space.

[1]  M. P. Soler,et al.  Characterization of hilbert spaces by orthomodular spaces , 1995 .

[2]  E U Condon RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN QUANTUM MECHANICS. , 1928, Science.

[3]  J. VonNeumann Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik , 1932 .

[4]  C. Piron,et al.  Mécanique quantique : bases et applications , 1998 .

[5]  Dirk Aerts,et al.  Classical theories and nonclassical theories as special cases of a more general theory , 1983 .

[6]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Quantum, classical and intermediate: An illustrative example , 1994 .

[7]  S. Holland,et al.  Orthomodularity in infinite dimensions; a theorem of M. Solèr , 1995 .

[8]  Dirk Aerts Construction of a structure which enables to describe the joint system of a classical system and a quantum system , 1984 .

[9]  W. John Wilbur,et al.  On characterizing the standard quantum logics , 1977 .

[10]  V. Varadarajan Geometry of quantum theory , 1968 .

[11]  Abner Shimony,et al.  The logic of quantum mechanics , 1981 .

[12]  Hans Arwed Keller,et al.  Ein nicht-klassischer Hilbertscher Raum. , 1980 .

[13]  N. Zierler Axioms for non-relativistic quantum mechanics. , 1961 .

[14]  Diederik Aerts Quantum structures: An attempt to explain the origin of their appearance in nature , 1995 .

[15]  S. Pulmannová,et al.  Coupling of quantum logics , 1983 .

[16]  Dirk Aerts,et al.  A possible explanation for the probabilities of quantum mechanics , 1986 .

[17]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  State Property Systems and Closure Spaces: A Study of Categorical Equivalence , 1999 .

[18]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  A mechanistic classical laboratory situation violating the Bell inequalities with 2-2 , 1991 .

[19]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Quantum Axiomatics and a Theorem of M. P. Solèr , 2000 .

[20]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Quantum axiomatics and a theorem of , 2000 .

[21]  D. J. Foulis,et al.  The Operational Approach to Quantum Mechanics , 1978 .

[22]  Ingrid Daubechies,et al.  Physical justiflcation for using the tensor product to describe two quantum systems as one joint system , 1978 .

[23]  Günther Ludwig Foundations of quantum mechanics , 1983 .

[24]  A. Gatti,et al.  Quantum Structures , 1998, Technical Digest. 1998 EQEC. European Quantum Electronics Conference (Cat. No.98TH8326).

[25]  H. Dishkant,et al.  Logic of Quantum Mechanics , 1976 .

[26]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Quantum structures, separated physical entities and probability , 1994 .

[27]  C. Piron,et al.  On the Foundations of Quantum Physics , 1976 .

[28]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Quantum, classical and intermediate I: a model on the Poincaré sphere , 1997 .

[29]  D. J. Foulis,et al.  A Mathematical Setting for Inductive Reasoning , 1976 .

[30]  Dirk Aerts,et al.  Description of many separated physical entities without the paradoxes encountered in quantum mechanics , 1982 .

[31]  Sylvia Pulmannová Tensor product of quantum logics , 1985 .

[32]  G. Ludwig An axiomatic basis for quantum mechanics , 1985 .

[33]  David J. Foulis,et al.  Realism, operationalism, and quantum mechanics , 1983 .

[34]  David J. Foulis,et al.  What are Quantum Logics and What Ought They to be , 1981 .

[35]  David J. Foulis,et al.  Properties and operational propositions in quantum mechanics , 1983 .

[36]  Sylvia Pulmannová,et al.  Axiomatization of quantum logics , 1996 .

[37]  Dirk Aerts Construction of the tensor product for the lattices of properties of physical entities , 1984 .

[38]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Quantum, classical and intermediate II: the vanishing vector space structure , 1997 .