Collective intelligence in law enforcement - The WikiCrimes system

Collaboration is on the rise, primordially leveraged by the Web 2.0 in which the difference between information producer and consumer decreases significantly. In this paper we describe WikiCrimes, an example of a Web 2.0 application that offers a collaborative environment based on the use and direct manipulation of maps, in order to register and research criminal events. WikiCrimes is driven by three goals: (i) to give more transparency and publicity to criminal information, (ii) to provide means for citizen prevention, and (iii) to reduce the phenomenon of under-reporting (crimes that are not notified to authorities). In the paper we pay particular attention to the fact that in this context, finding the equilibrium between people's participation and information credibility is crucial. Anonymous mass collaboration is the easiest way to receive information; however, the credibility of the received information is depreciated, because the source of information is unknown. We particularly concentrate on the ways we have created to keep the ''participation vs. reliability of information'' trade-off at good level. The reputation model is the main component created with this purpose. The experiences and the obstacles we are facing in the implementation of the project are the subjects of discussion and analyses.

[1]  Andrea Omicini,et al.  Supporting coordination in open computational systems with TuCSon , 2003, WET ICE 2003. Proceedings. Twelfth IEEE International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, 2003..

[2]  Ted S. Sindlinger,et al.  Crowdsourcing: Why the Power of the Crowd is Driving the Future of Business , 2010 .

[3]  Pablo Noriega,et al.  Engineering open environments with electronic institutions , 2005, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[4]  Clarisse Sieckenius de Souza,et al.  The Semiotic Engineering of Human-Computer Interaction , 2005 .

[5]  Saul Greenberg,et al.  Computer-supported cooperative work and groupware , 1991 .

[6]  Tim O'Reilly,et al.  What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software , 2007 .

[7]  Kai-Hsiung Chang,et al.  Classifying groupware , 2000, ACM-SE 38.

[8]  Simone Diniz Junqueira Barbosa Adopting a communication-centered design approach to support interdisciplinary design teams , 2004, ICSE 2004.

[9]  Kurt Jensen,et al.  Coloured Petri Nets: Basic Concepts, Analysis Methods and Practical Use. Vol. 1, Basic Concepts , 1992 .

[10]  Brian D. Davison,et al.  Propagating Trust and Distrust to Demote Web Spam , 2006, MTW.

[11]  Kurt Jensen,et al.  Coloured Petri Nets: Basic Concepts, Analysis Methods and Practical Use. Vol. 2, Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[12]  Martin Purvis,et al.  Aspects of Openness in Multi-Agent Systems: Coordinating the Autonomy in Agent Societies , 2009 .

[13]  Victoria Ungureanu,et al.  Law-governed interaction: a coordination and control mechanism for heterogeneous distributed systems , 2000, TSEM.

[14]  Douglas Thorby,et al.  1 – Basic Concepts , 2008 .

[15]  Franco Zambonelli,et al.  Organizational Abstractions for the Analysis and Design of Multi-agent Systems , 2000, AOSE.

[16]  Stephen Cranefield,et al.  Institutions and commitments in open multi-agent systems , 2004 .

[17]  M. Colombetti The Role of Institutions in Multiagent Systems , 2002 .

[18]  M. Wooldridge,et al.  Organisational Abstractions for the Analysis and Design of Multi-Agent Systems , 2000 .

[19]  Zhe Jiang,et al.  Spatial Statistics , 2013 .

[20]  Javier Vázquez-Salceda,et al.  Ontological aspects of the implementation of norms in agent-based electronic institutions , 2006, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[21]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Computer supported cooperative work and groupware , 1994, CHI Conference Companion.

[22]  Simone Diniz Junqueira Barbosa,et al.  Extreme designing: binding sketching to an interaction model in a streamlined HCI design approach , 2006, IHC '06.

[23]  G. Cuní,et al.  How to Talk About Reputation Using a Common Ontology: From Definition to Implementation , 2007 .

[24]  Martin K. Purvis,et al.  Open Collaborative Systems as Institutions of Agents , 2008, 2008 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology.

[25]  Pablo Noriega,et al.  Operationalisation of norms for usage in electronic institutions , 2006, AAMAS '06.

[26]  Leonard J. Bass,et al.  Bridging the gaps II: bridging the gaps between software engineering and human-computer interaction , 2004, Proceedings. 26th International Conference on Software Engineering.